1995 Chevrolet Blazer

High concern

Owners filed 1,224 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the brakes. It has been recalled 11 times.

Avoid One of the Chevrolet Blazer years to avoid: 5.0× the complaints of a typical Blazer year. Which Chevrolet Blazer years to avoid →

When it fails
020k40k60k90k120k200k
98,000 milesMedian miles at failure

64 complaints record an odometer reading. Failures cluster around 120,000–150,000 miles.

Most common 1995 Chevrolet Blazer problems

482 of the 1,224 complaints (39%) are about the brakes.

ComponentReportsCrashesFiresInjuries
Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip · brakes374
68230
Visibility › Windshield Wiper/Washer87
100
Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine › Gasoline · engine52
150
Engine and Engine Cooling › Exhaust System › Emission Control › Gas Recirculation Valve (egr Valve) · engine51
000
Visibility › Windshield Wiper/Washer › Motor50
000
Air Bags › Frontal · airbags36
34124
Fuel System, Gasoline › Fuel Injection System · fuel system30
000
Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Foundation Components · brakes24
702
Vehicle Speed Control · throttle and acceleration23
500
Power Train › Automatic Transmission · transmission22
000

1995 Chevrolet Blazer brakes problems

39% of all complaints

482 of the 1,224 complaints are about the brakes. This is what owners describe:

  • loses its brakes or the pedal sinks29% · 141
  • knocks, grinds or clunks4% · 20
  • sets off warning lights on the dash3% · 15

Share of the 482 brakes complaints whose text describes each symptom. One complaint can describe several.

Typical mileage
122,363 mi
median of 17 reports
Peak year of filing
1997
115 brakes complaints that year
Crashes · fires · injuries
86 · 2 · 35
in these complaints
“I was slowing down to come to a stop when my brakes failed. The more I pressed my brakes the faster the truck started to accelerate and the rear tires were spinning. I pressed the emergency brakes and they failed also. The only way of stopping was for me to throw it in park. While trying to brake the brake went to the floor.”
Owner complaint, filed May 10, 2005 at 140,655 miles
“Abs brakes fails to stop the suv/blazer when I need to brake in a hurry, brake pedal goes to the floor and it makes strange noise, it takes a long distance to stop.*ak”
Owner complaint, filed Jan 3, 2005 at 122,363 miles

Complaints and recalls over time

By year of filing
1994: 0 complaints, 0 about the brakes'941995: 124 complaints, 54 about the brakes1996: 128 complaints, 59 about the brakes1997: 202 complaints, 115 about the brakes1998: 159 complaints, 54 about the brakes'981999: 228 complaints, 93 about the brakes2000: 147 complaints, 47 about the brakes2001: 84 complaints, 22 about the brakes2002: 53 complaints, 14 about the brakes'022003: 44 complaints, 3 about the brakes2004: 20 complaints, 8 about the brakes2005: 13 complaints, 6 about the brakes2006: 5 complaints, 0 about the brakes'062007: 4 complaints, 0 about the brakes2008: 1 complaints, 0 about the brakes2009: 1 complaints, 0 about the brakes2010: 1 complaints, 1 about the brakes'102011: 2 complaints, 2 about the brakes2012: 1 complaints, 1 about the brakes2013: 2 complaints, 0 about the brakes2014: 1 complaints, 1 about the brakes'142015: 0 complaints, 0 about the brakes2016: 1 complaints, 0 about the brakes2017: 0 complaints, 0 about the brakes2018: 1 complaints, 1 about the brakes'182019: 2 complaints, 1 about the brakesRecall 94V242000 (brakes)Recall 95V080000 (suspension)Recall 95V180000 (engine)Recall 96V234000 (fuel system)Recall 98V150001 (visibility)Recall 99V193000 (brakes)Recall 99I006000 (brakes)Recall 06E023000 (headlights)Recall 06E041000 (fuel system)Recall 09E012000 (headlights)NHTSA investigation EA02006NHTSA investigation EA01019NHTSA investigation EA00008NHTSA investigation EA97022NHTSA investigation PE97028NHTSA investigation EA94038
All complaintsAbout the brakesRecall (red: the brakes)NHTSA investigation opened

Complaints about the 1995 Blazer peaked in 1999, with 228 filed that year. Owners had filed 0 complaints about the brakes before the first recall that covers it, 94V242000 in December 1994; 482 more have come in since. In 2019 owners filed 2 so far.

11 safety recalls

Part 573 reports
Exterior Lighting09E012000
Filed Apr 7, 200916,270 vehiclesSabersport

Defect. SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.

Risk. DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.

Remedy. SABERSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 11, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SABERSPORT AT 1-909-598-7589.

Fuel System, Gasoline06E043000
Filed May 19, 200688,303 vehiclesHoneywell International, Inc.

Defect. CERTAIN REPLACEMENT FUEL FILTERS, FRAM BRAND NAME P/N G3727, WITH DATE CODES X52911 THROUGH X60801 SEQUENTIALLY OR X600141 AND A MEXICO COUNTRY OR ORIGIN MARKING ON THE FUEL FILTER HOUSING MANUFACTURED FROM OCTOBER 18, 2005, THROUGH MARCH 21, 2006, SOLD FOR USE ON THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE AND ON CERTAIN SCHOOL BUSES. (TO SEE THE SCHOOL BUS ENGINE SIZES, CLICK ON "DOCUMENT SEARCH" AND THEN "BUS APPLICATIONS"). THE CONNECTOR ON THE FUEL FILTER WAS NOT MANUFACTURED TO HONEYWELL'S SPECIFICATION. AS A RESULT, THE O-RING MAY NOT SEAT CORRECTLY ON THE FUEL LINE.

Risk. THIS CONDITION MAY CAUSE AN INADEQUATE SEAL AT THE CONNECTION, POTENTIALLY LEADING TO A FUEL LEAK. IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, A FIRE COULD OCCUR.

Remedy. HONEYWELL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE FUEL FILTERS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 18, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FRAM CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-890-2075 (OPTION 1).

Fuel System, Gasoline › Delivery › Hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings06E041000
Filed May 18, 20067,800 vehiclesR&b, Inc.

Defect. CERTAIN R&B, INC. CENTRAL MULTIPORT FUEL INJECTION (CMFI) FUEL RETURN LINES, MODELS HELP 55163, NAPA BALKAMP 700-3270, AND THE CONNECTION 2560001, SOLD FOR USE AS REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT FOR THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE FUEL RETURN LINE HAS A MECHANICAL BLEED VALVE WHICH WAS NOT INSTALLED AT THE PROPER TORQUE.

Risk. A FUEL LEAK CAN OCCUR AT THE VALVE, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A FIRE.

Remedy. R&B, INC. WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND AT THE CUSTOMERS REQUEST, EITHER REPLACE THE FUEL LINE OR OFFER A FULL REFUND. THE RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 4, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT R&B, INC. AT 215-712-5330.

Exterior Lighting › Headlights06E023000
Filed Mar 13, 2006292,000 vehiclesAnzo USA, Inc.

Defect. CERTAIN ANZO COMBINATION HEADLAMP ASSEMBLIES SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS WHICH FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT."

Risk. WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH.

Remedy. ANZO WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE HEADLAMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN MAY 9, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT ANZO USA AT 909-468-3688.

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip99V193000
Filed Jul 19, 19991,125,749 vehiclesGeneral Motors Corp.

Defect. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: CERTAIN 4-WHEEL DRIVE PICKUP TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH ABS (ANTILOCK BRAKING SYSTEM) MANUFACTURED FROM SEPTEMBER 1989 THROUGH AUGUST 1996. UNDER CERTAIN DRIVING CONDITIONS THE SWITCH WHICH SIGNALS THE ABS SYSTEM WHETHER THE VEHICLE IS IN 2-WHEEL OR 4-WHEEL DRIVE CAN MALFUNCTION CAUSING INCREASED STOPPING DISTANCES DURING ABS STOPS WHILE IN THE TWO-WHEEL DRIVE MODE.

Risk. IF THIS OCCURRED AT A TIME WHEN MINIMUM STOPPING DISTANCE WAS REQUIRED, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.

Remedy. DEALERS WILL REPLACE OR REPAIR THE 4-WHEEL/2-WHEEL DRIVE SWITCH.

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip99I006000
Filed Jul 19, 19992,400,000 vehiclesGeneral Motors Corp.

Defect. THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAFETY ACT. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: CERTAIN LIGHT DUTY PICKUP TRUCKS, SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, OR MINIVANS EQUIPPED WITH 3-SENSOR ABS (ANTILOCK BRAKING SYSTEM) EBC4 UNITS.

Risk. THESE VEHICLES CAN EXPERIENCE EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCES DURING ABS STOPS ON CERTAIN MULTIPLE SURFACES, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy. DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE COMPUTER PROGRAM WHICH OPERATES THE ABS UNIT ON SOME VEHICLES, OR REPLACE THE COMPUTER ON OTHERS TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ABS ON THESE SURFACES.

Visibility › Windshield Wiper/Washer98V150001
Filed Jul 1, 19981,557,585 vehiclesGeneral Motors Corp.

Defect. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: LIGHT DUTY PICKUP TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, 2 AND 4-WHEEL DRIVE. SOLDER JOINTS NEAR THE WIRING HARNESS CONNECTOR CAN CRACK CAUSING THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS TO WORK INTERMITTENTLY.

Risk. THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN INOPERATIVE WIPERS, REDUCING A DRIVER'S VISIBILITY, AND INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.

Remedy. DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE WIPER MOTOR CIRCUIT BOARD AND COVER.

Fuel System, Gasoline › Storage › Tank Assembly96V234000
Filed Nov 14, 1996432,183 vehiclesGeneral Motors Corp.

Defect. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: 4-DOOR, 4-WHEEL DRIVE AND ALL-WHEEL DRIVE MULTI-PURPOSE PASSENGER VEHICLES. DURING DEVELOPMENT TESTING, THE PROP SHAFT CONTACTED THE INBOARD SIDE OF THE FUEL TANK ALLOWING FUEL LEAKAGE. THIS LEAKAGE WAS IN EXCESS OF THE AMOUNT PERMITTED BY FMVSS 301, "FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY."

Risk. IF AN IGNITION SOURCE IS PRESENT, AND THERE IS A FUEL LEAK, A FIRE COULD OCCUR.

Remedy. DEALERS WILL INSTALL ADDITIONAL SHIELDING OF THE FUEL TANK. THIS WILL BE ADDED WITHOUT REMOVING OR DISASSEMBLING THE FUEL SYSTEM.

Engine and Engine Cooling › Cooling System › Fan95V180000
Filed Sep 22, 199573,163 vehiclesGeneral Motors Corp.

Defect. FAN BLADE RIVET BREAKAGE CAN OCCUR CAUSING THE FAN BLADE TO SEPARATE FROM THE SPIDER.

Risk. IF THIS OCCURRED WHILE THE HOOD WAS OPEN, A PERSON WORKING UNDER THE HOOD OF THE VEHICLE OR IN THE VICINITY OF THE VEHICLE COULD BE STRUCK BY THE FAN BLADE AND INJURED.

Remedy. DEALERS WILL INSPECT AND REPLACE, IF NECESSARY, THE FAN WITH A NEWER FAN HAVING THICKER-HEADED RIVETS.

Suspension › Front › Control Arm › Upper Ball Joint95V080000
Filed Apr 24, 1995271 vehiclesGeneral Motors Corp.

Defect. THE UPPER BALL JOINT NUTS WERE UNDER-TORQUED RESULTING IN IMPROPER SEATING IN THE STEERING KNUCKLE.

Risk. THIS CONDITION CAN CAUSE THE BALL JOINT STUD TO LOOSEN, AND FRACTURE RESULTING IN A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL.

Remedy. DEALERS WILL RETORQUE THE UPPER BALL JOINT NUT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE VEHICLE TO THE CORRECT TORQUE VALUES.

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Pedals and Linkages94V242000
Filed Dec 12, 1994262 vehiclesGeneral Motors Corp.

Defect. THE BRAKE PEDAL PIVOT BOLT WAS STARTED IN THE WELD NUT, BUT WAS NOT TORQUED CORRECTLY CAUSING THE BOLT TO DISENGAGE FROM THE WELD NUT.

Risk. THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN A TOTAL LOSS OF BRAKINGCAPABILITY.

Remedy. DEALERS WILL INSPECT FOR HAND-STARTED BRAKE PEDAL BOLTS AND TORQUE THEM TO CORRECT SPECIFICATIONS.

All 11 campaigns on file, newest first.

NHTSA investigations

Office of Defects Investigation

Before a recall there is often an investigation: NHTSA opens one when complaints or manufacturer data point to a safety defect. 8 name the 1995 Blazer.

WINDSHIELD WIPER FAILUREEngineering analysis EA02006Closed
Opened May 31, 2002Closed Jul 23, 2003Led to recall 03V159000visibility

As a result of this, and the precedinginvestigation, rq99-003, GM has expanded the population of safety recall 98v-150 (replacement of the windshield wiper control module) to include an additional 1.77 million vehicles.included are various 1994-1997 my m/l vans, s/t trucks and suvs, & c/k trucks and suvs.see attached technical report for details.

FRONT SEAT RECLINER BOLTEngineering analysis EA01019Closed
Opened Dec 28, 2001Closed Sep 27, 2002seats

There is no summary currently available

LOSS OF POWER ASSISTEngineering analysis EA00008Closed
Opened Mar 16, 2000Closed Aug 31, 2001brakes

There is no summary currently available

FRONT SEAT RECLINER BOLT FAILURERecall query RQ99015Closed
Opened Jul 14, 1999Closed Dec 28, 2001Led to recall 99V130000seats
LOSS OF POWER ASSIST BRAKINGPreliminary evaluation PE99024Closed
Opened Apr 5, 1999Closed Mar 16, 2000brakes

Consumers allege a partial loss of braking ability

WINDSHIELD WIPER FAILUREEngineering analysis EA97022Closed
Opened Oct 23, 1997Closed Jul 2, 1998Led to recall 98V150001visibility

There is no summary currently available

WINDSHIELD WIPERPreliminary evaluation PE97028Closed
Opened Jun 17, 1997Closed Oct 23, 1997visibility

During this preliminary evaluation, over 400 additional complaints were furnished by GM.in addition GM reported over 3000 wiper system warranty repairs on the subject vehicles.

ABS BRAKING SYSTEMEngineering analysis EA94038Closed
Opened Oct 31, 1994Closed Feb 28, 2000brakes

This investigation resulted in a safety recall, 99v-193, and a service campaign, 99i-006.

Technical service bulletins

51 on file

Repair instructions the manufacturer sent its dealers for the 1995 Blazer. Not recalls: the fix is usually free only while the car is under warranty.

equipment 11body and frame 8fuel system 5engine 5visibility 5electrical system 4brakes 3transmission 3
020525006Service Bulletin/Repair InstructionsJan 1, 2006brakes

ANTILOCK BRAKE (ABS) ACTIVATION AT LOW SPEEDS. *TT

020525006AService Bulletin/Repair InstructionsDec 1, 2002brakes

ANTILOCK BRAKE (ABS) ACTIVATION AT LOW SPEEDS ON VARIOUS MODELS INCLUDING THE 1995 AND 1996 ENVOY. *TT

240699Service Bulletin/Repair InstructionsJul 24, 1999brakes

SUBJECT REGARDING ABS 3-SENSOR EBC4 - SPECIAL POLICY. *TT

What owners reported

Newest filings
Electrical System
Filed Sep 16, 2019254,000 milesIA

I HAD JUST PUT MY KEY IN THE IGNITION WENT TO TURN IT OVER AND NOTICED THAT MY HAZARDS WERE ON. THE SWITCH WAS IN THE OFF POSITION. I HAD TO SLIGHTLY KEEP IT PUSHED FORWARD OR IT WOULD CYCLE THROUGH THE HAZARDS, LEFT TURN SIGNAL AND RIGHT TURN SIGNAL. I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET THE PROBLEM FIXED SINCE IT JUST HAPPENED YESTERDAY

Service Brakes
Filed Apr 18, 2019256,000 milesCA

ON HIGHWAY TRUCK DIES ALL SYSTEMS OFF IHAVE ALL RECEIPTS MULITPLE REPAIRS FROM THE EGR VALVE COILS FUEL PUMP SPIDER ..ALONG WITH MULTIPLE ELECTRICAL ISSUES INVOLVING THE EMERGENCY BUTTON WILL NOT TURN OFF HAD REPLACED STILL ISSUE CAME BACK, CAR WILL NOT START UNLESS SOMETHING CLICKS IN STEERING COLUMN ALSO DISTRIBUTOR AND TIMING MISSING ? I CAN GO ON ..NIGHTMARE.I LOVE MY TRUCK HOWERE I COULD HAVE GOTTEN A NEW CAR FOR THIS MUCH BUT HAVE PUT SO MUCH MONEY INTO IT AND IM A SINGLE MOM NOT ON ANY GOV ASSISTANCE OR WELFARE OR SUPPORT..PLEASE THIS TRUCK>>>>ARGH

Service Brakes
Filed Jan 17, 2018316,000 milesMT

ABS FAILURE. ALL THREE ABS ISOLATION VALVES CLOSED EITHER AT START OF BREAKING OR PRIOR TO BRAKING CYCLE, RESULTING IN NO POSSIBLE DEPRESSION OF THE BRAKE PETAL AND ABSOLUTELY NO BRAKING WHAT SO EVER, LITERALLY NONE. THE VEHICLE CONTINUES AT WHATEVER SPEED THE VEHICLE WAS AT BEFORE INITIATION OF BRAKING. THIS NO BRAKE CONDITION HAPPENED INTERMITTENTLY AS SPEEDS FROM 15MPH TO HIGHWAY SPEEDS. UPON RELEASING BREAK PRESSURE (TAKING ONE'S FOOT OF THE PETAL) AND REAPPLYING THE BREAKS THE LEFT FRONT ABS ISOLATION VALVE WOULD DE-ENERGIZE AND GIVE THE DRIVER THE LEFT FRONT BREAK ONLY. THIS FAILURE WAS INTERMITTENT OVER THE LAST YEAR AND NOT WITNESSED BY ME UNTIL 1/13/2018. THE ABS FUSE WAS REMOVED AND THE BRAKES REMAIN WITHOUT ABS FUNCTION. THIS IS A MAJOR FAILURE THAT COULD HAVE CAUSED A DEADLY ACCIDENT AND MOST PROBABLY HAS. BUT, SINCE IT IS INTERMITTENT AND DEAD PEOPLE CAN'T TESTIFY YOU PROBABLY DO NOT HAVE MUCH OF A DATA BASE. ALSO, AS AN ENGINEER MYSELF, THIS IS A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE THAT SHOULD PRECIPITATE THE COMPLETE DEACTIVATION OF AUTOMATED FUNCTIONS OF ALL VEHICLES WORLDWIDE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS ALL AUTOMATED FUNCTIONS CAN BE OVERRIDDEN BY MANUAL INPUTS WITHOUT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUAL INPUTS.

Air BagsCrash1 injured
Filed Jun 20, 2016298,430 milesOH

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. WHILE DRIVING 40 MPH, THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO AN EMBANKMENT. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED INJURIES TO THE SPINE, A WHIPLASH, AND A CONCUSSION WHICH REQUIRED MEDICAL ATTENTION. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 298,430.

Service Brakes
Filed Jun 20, 201440,000 milesCA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED THE VEHICLE BEGAN SLIDING. NONE OF THE WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DIAGNOSE THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.

Fuel System, Gasoline
Filed Nov 19, 2013140,000 milesTX

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT SHE NOTICED A GASOLINE FUEL SMELL WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS WHERE THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE FUEL TANK WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 140,000. UPDATED 12/30/13*CN

Engine
Filed Nov 13, 2013121,368 milesTX

I HAVE GAS LEAK THAT COME FROM THE BACK OF THE CAR AND THAT IS WHEN I GET OUT OF THE BLAZER, AND IT SEEM TO BE WHEEL PROBLEM. *TR

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited SlipCrash
Filed Jun 20, 2012IA

1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO TWO RECALLS CONCERNING VEHICLE *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED ONE OF THE RECALLS WERE REPAIRED. HOWEVER, THE OTHER RECALL, PERTAINING TO THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM CAUSED AN AT FAULT ACCIDENT WHICH GM REJECTED, BECAUSE THE STATUTE OF LIMITATION HAD EXPIRED. *JB

Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Filed Nov 11, 2011PA

BACKGROUND: PURCHASED USED BLAZER APPROX 2 YEARS AGO. "ANTI-LOCK BRAKES" DASH LIGHT HAS ALWAYS BEEN ON. I AM GOOD DIY AND VERY EXPERIENCED MECHANIC WITH APPROPRIATE TOOLS. I HAVE TRIED OFF AND ON SINCE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE TO SOLVE THIS ISSUE. I EVEN HAVE REPLACED ALL BRAKES AND MASTER CYLINDER. PROBLEM: I CAME UPON SAFECAR.GOV LAST NIGHT AND FOUND SEVERAL RECALL NOTICES ON MY TYPE OF VEHICLE, TO INCLUDE ANTI-LOCK BRAKES. I CALLED THE CHEVY CUSTOMER SERVICE NUMBER FOR RECALLS AND EXPLAINED THE ABOVE PARAGRAPH. AFTER I STATED I FOUND THE RECALLS ON SAFECAR.GOV AND WANTED TO CHECK IF MY SPECIFIC VEHICLE HAD ANY OUTSTANDING RECALLS, I WAS PROMPTLY TOLD THAT SAFECAR.GOV IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED OR APPROVED CHEVY WEBSITE. IT WAS INFERRED TO ME BY THE OPERATOR BY HER TONE (THOUGH VERY POLITE) AND LANGUAGE THAT SAFECAR.GOV IS SOME ROGUE WEBSITE THAT SHOULD BE PAID NO MIND. THIS HAD ME CONCERNED BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY SAFECAR.GOV IS A NHTSA WEBSITE AND I AM SURE THE RECALLS LISTED ARE ACCURATE. THE OPERATOR THEN LOOKED UP MY VIN AND STATED THERE WERE NO OUTSTANDING RECALLS ON MY VEHICLE. THIS TRUCK ME AS ODD BECAUSE THE RECALLS ON BRAKES I FOUND DESCRIBED HOW MY VEHICLE REACTS WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM. I AM NOT TRYING TO GET SOMETHING FOR NOTHING. IF THERE WERE/ARE REALLY NO RECALLS ON MY VEHICLE.THAN SO BE IT, NO PROBLEM. HOWEVER, WITH THE WAY SAFECAR.GOV WAS BRUSHED ASIDE BY THE OPERATOR, IT MAKES ME WONDER IF IN FACT THERE WERE RECALLS AND CHEVY IS JUST TRYING TO SAVE FROM REPAIRING OLDE

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Filed Nov 7, 201148,200 milesPA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 40 MPH WHEN THE BRAKES WERE DEPRESSED TO THE FLOORBOARD BUT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A PRIVATE MECHANIC AND THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED WHO CONFIRMED THAT THE VIN DID NOT QUALIFY FOR REPAIRS UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 99V193000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:ANTI-LOCK). THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 48,200 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 48,800. UPDATED 12/16/11 *BF THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A CERTIFIED MECHANIC WHERE THE BRAKE SYSTEM WAS FLUSHED. UPDATED 12/22/11

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Filed Apr 27, 2010144,300 milesNY

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. THE CONTACT STATED THE BRAKING SYSTEM WAS LEAKING FLUIDS. THE CONTACT HAD THE FRONT ROTOR AND THE FRONT BRAKE PADS REPLACED HOWEVER THE ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM WOULD NOT OPERATE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 144,300.

Electrical SystemFire
Filed Feb 11, 2009WI

I THINK FAULTY WIRING BECAUSE MY TRUCK CAUGHT FIRE AND THERE DEALER SAID THE WAS NO CAUSE IN THE DOOR PANEL. *TR

Fuel System, Gasoline
Filed Oct 9, 2008142,303 milesPA

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25-35 MPH, THE ENGINE STOPPED RUNNING WITHOUT WARNING. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. THE ENGINE FAILED TO RESTART AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE CONTACT'S RESIDENCE. THE VEHICLE WAS INSPECTED BY A RELATIVE, WHO STATED THAT THE FAILURE WAS RELATED TO THE FUEL PUMP. THE CONTACT CALLED THE DEALER AND WAS ADVISED TO REMOVE THE FUEL PUMP FROM THE VEHICLE AND TAKE IT TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER FOR REPAIR. THE VEHICLE IS CURRENTLY INOPERABLE UNTIL THE COMPONENT IS REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 142,303.

Fuel System, Gasoline › Fuel Injection System › Injectors
Filed Oct 29, 2007206,000 milesOH

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER. WHILE DRIVING 63 MPH, THE FUEL INJECTOR STOPPED WORKING AND THE ENGINE BEGAN TO STALL. THERE WERE NO WARNING INDICATORS BEFORE THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THERE WAS A LOSS OF POWER STEERING AND THE ENGINE EVENTUALLY SHUT OFF WHEN THE CONTACT PULLED TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO RESTART THE VEHICLE AND DRIVE IT TO THE MECHANIC. THE WEATHER WAS NOT A FACTOR. THE CONTACT REFERENCED NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 06E041000 (FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS). THE MECHANIC STATED THAT THE FUEL INJECTION VALVE FAILED AND THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED WITH THE NEW PARTS. THE INCIDENT OCCURRED AGAIN SEVERAL MONTHS LATER. THE CONTACT RECEIVED AN INVOICE. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 219,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 206,000.

Structure › Body › Roof and PillarsCrash3 injured
Filed Oct 10, 200796,000 milesNJ

ROLLOVER WHEN TRAVELING FROM SHOULDER ONTO THE ROADWAY, RESULTING IN PARTIAL ROOF COLLAPSE, POSSIBLE SEATBELT FAILURE, SHATTERING OF ALL WINDOWS EXCEPT THE REAR HATCH. *TR

Fuel System, Gasoline › Storage
Filed Mar 16, 2007145,000 milesME

GAS TANK FAILURE-- CORROSION

Vehicle Speed Control
Filed Feb 18, 200770,000 milesCO

TWO OCCURRENCES: CAR WAS STARTED WHEN WARM, AND QUICKLY THROTTLED UP TO HIGH RPMS. MECHANIC DISCONNECTED ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS, AND REPLACED ALTERNATOR. SIX MONTHS LATER, CAR STARTED NORMALLY WHEN WARM, AND THROTTLED TO HIGH RPMS AFTER TRAVELING 30 FEET, HEADED TOWARD PEDESTRIANS. APPLYING BOTH BRAKES STOPPED THE CAR, BUT MOTOR CONTINUED TO THROTTLE, UNTIL IGNITION TURNED OFF. CAR STARTED NORMALLY A MINUTE LATER, AND I PARKED AFTER DRIVING UNEVENTFULLY TWO BLOCKS WITH HAND ON IGNITION KEY. I'M AFRAID TO DRIVE IT AGAIN, UNTIL DIAGNOSED. *JB

Fuel System, Gasoline › Fuel Injection System
Filed Aug 24, 200600

REGARDING CPI FAILURE: CHECK "O" RING BEHIND FUEL PRESSURE REGULATOR(ROUGH IDLE,LOSS OF POWER,REDUCED GAS MILEAGE; FUEL IN MANIFOLD; WHEN TESTING FUEL PRESSURE IT DROPS ALMOST INSTANTLY WHEN FUEL PUMP SHUTS OFF) PRETTY EASY TO MISTAKE FOR A CPI FAILURE. *JB

Electrical System › Wiring › Interior/Under DashFire
Filed May 21, 2006179,456 milesNH

VEHICLE PARKED IN DOOR YARD.. CAUGHT FIRE IN THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR AND DASHBOARD MELTED PLASTIC ON DASH.. ELECTRICAL PROBLEM. *JB

Fuel System, Diesel › Storage › Tank AssemblyCrash
Filed Feb 10, 2006145,000 milesIL

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE GAS TANK LEAKED SLIGHTLY AND SMOKED. THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL, # 96V234000, REGARDING THE TANK ASSEMBLY. THE VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL; HOWEVER IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. IN ADDITION, DURING A SMOKING EPISODE THE EMERGENCY BRAKE WAS APPLIED, BUT DID NOT HOLD CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO ROLL BACK INTO A TREE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT REPAIR SHOP WHERE IT IS AWAITING REPAIR.

Fuel System, Gasoline › Storage › Tank Assembly
Filed Jan 13, 200695,000 milesIL

DT*: THE CONSUMER STATED THE FUEL TANK IS LEAKING. THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL # 96V234000, REGARDING THE TANK ASSEMBLY. THE CONSUMER EXPERIENCED THE SAME PROBLEM AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL. THE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. *JB

Electrical System
Filed Jan 10, 2006126,000 milesMN

VEHICLE WILL STALL AND /OR DIE WHEN COMING TO COMPLETE STOPS, TURNING CORNERS, AND IDLING. REPLACED ECG VALVE TWICE PROBLEM STILL THERE. THE STALLING AND DYING SEEM TO GET WORSE WHEN GAS TANK IS BELOW 1/4. STARTED ROUGH WHEN RUNNING BAD I AM NOW ON MY 3RD STARTER IN 8 MONTHS. THE FIRST PROBLEM WAS 4 DAYS AFTER I HAD OWNED THE VEHICLE. DIED ON CORNER AND WOULD NOT START. ECG VALVE CHANGED AND COMPUTER READ NO OTHER PROBLEMS. *JB

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited SlipCrash
Filed Nov 11, 2005174,000 milesOK

I HAVE HAD EXTREME BRAKING PROBLEMS THAT ARE STILL NOT FIXED. UNDER NORMAL CITY DRIVING CONDITIONS, BRAKES ARE VERY SLOW TO STOP REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH PRESSURE I PUT ON THEM AND OCCASIONALLY LOCK UP. I MUST RELEASE THE BRAKE PEDAL AND PUMP IT TO CATCH SO THE CAR WILL COME TO A STOP. 2 MONTHS AGO, A WOMAN STOPPED AT THE LAST MINUTE IN FRONT OF ME. I HIT MY BRAKES WITH MORE THAN ENOUGH ROOM TO STOP (2-3 CAR LENGTHS). THEY LOCKED UP AND MADE THEIR NORMAL GRINDING NOISE. I HIT HER CAR CAUSING DAMAGE TO BOTH VEHICLES. LAST MONTH, WHILE TRYING TO SLOW DOWN TO PAY AT A TOLL BOOTH, I HAD TO LITERALLY STAND ON MY BRAKE PEDAL TO STOP THE TRUCK. THE TOLL BOOTH ATTENDANT JUMPED OUT OF THE BOOTH IN FEAR THAT I WAS GOING TO CRASH. THE SAME THING HAPPENS COMING OFF THE HIGHWAY AT 45 MILES PER HOUR. I CAN'T GET ANOTHER VEHICLE, BUT THIS ONE IS GOING TO KILL MY CHILDREN AND I. I HAVE REPLACED THE BOOSTER, PADS TWICE, ROTORS, AND THE THING ATTACHED TO THE BOOSTER. HAVE I MISSED A RECALL? HELP ME!!*JB

Engine and Engine Cooling › Exhaust System › Emission Control › Gas Recirculation Valve (egr Valve)
Filed Oct 15, 2005LA

I HAD THE EGR VALVE REPLACED BECAUSE THERE WAS PROBLEMS WITH MY VEHICLE RUNNING TERRIBLE AND KILLING IN TRAFFIC. IT WAS REPLACED FREE BECAUSE THERE WAS A BULLETIN, I REALLY WONDER IF IT WAS REPLACED ON 10/01 BECAUSE ALMOST 1 YEAR LATER 9/02 I STARTED HAVING THE SAME PROBLEMS AGAIN AND IT COST ME $272 TO HAVE IT FIXED AND ONCE AGAIN AS OF 10/11/05 COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC REVEALS THAT THE EGR IS STICKING AGAIN AND IT'S GOING TO COST $375,COULD I HAVE POSSIBLE GOTTEN A DEFECTIVE EGR ON 10/01. ALSO, I HAVE HAD THIS PROBLEM WITH MY BLAZER SHORTLY AFTER I PURCHASED IT . WHEN DRIVING ON UNEVEN SURFACE IT SOUNDS AS IF SOMETHING IS CRACKING AND TRYING TO FALL TO PIECES IN THE FRONT AND THE STEERING IS LOOSE AND PULLS TO ONE SIDE, EVEN AFTER A FRONT END ALIGNMENT AND ROTATION AND BALANCE, THE PROBLEM IS NOT CORRECTED. I ACTUALLY HAD 1 OF MANY FRONT END ALIGNMENT AND ROTATION DONE ON 10/07/05 AND MY FRONT END PROBLEM HAS GOTTEN MUCH,MUCH WORSE THAN USUALLY. I AM ALMOST SCARED TO DRIVE IT. *JB

Tires
Filed Aug 18, 2005139,000 milesMI

DT: 1995 CHEVROLET TRAILBLAZER. THE CONSUMER STATES THE INSURANCE ADJUSTER TOLD HIM THE CABLE THAT HOLDS THE SPARE TIRE UNDERNEATH THE VEHICLE BROKE. WHEN IT BROKE THE TIRE BOUNCED ON THE ROAD AND LANDED IN THE WEEDS. THE CONSUMER WAS TRYING TO HAVE THIS FIXED. THE CONSUMER HAS NOT CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER ABOUT THE PROBLEM.*AK

Suspension › Front › Control Arm › Lower Ball JointCrash
Filed Jul 27, 200593,000 milesNC

WHILE TRAVELING ON ASPHALT SERVICE ROAD AT APPROX. 40 MPH, THE FRONT LEFT BALL JOINT FAILED CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO CROSS THE ROAD AND INTO A DITCH. PART HAS SINCE BEEN REPAIRED WITH THE ADDITIONAL REPAIR

Latches/Locks/Linkages › Doors › Latch
Filed Jul 5, 2005TN

DT: CONSUMER'S WIFE WAS DRIVING AND TRIED TO EXIT VEHICLE AND SHE WAS LOCKED INSIDE AND COULD NOT GET OUT. SHE TRIED ESCAPING USING BOTH DRIVER'S SIDE AND PASSENGER SIDE DOORS. SHE THEN TRIED TO PHYSICALLY ROLL DOWN WINDOWS AND OPEN DOOR FROM OUTSIDE, BUT TO NO AVAIL. ALSO TRIED USING REMOTE DOOR LOCKS OPTION, AS WELL AS MANUALLY DOING SO. UNABLE TO GET OUT OF VEHICLE CONSUMER'S WIFE DROVE HOME, HAD HUSBAND CAME OUTSIDE AND TRIED TO OPEN DOORS WITHOUT SUCCESS. CONSUMER HAD TO GET KEY AND MANUALLY TRY TO OPEN DOORS, STILL WOULD NOT OPEN. CONSUMER'S WIFE HAD TO CRAWL OUT OF THE WINDOW. THE VEHICLE IS CURRENTLY AT DEALERSHIP FOR REPAIRS. NO EXPLANATION AS OF YET AS TO WHY THIS OCCURRED. *AK *NM

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited SlipCrash
Filed Jun 8, 2005147,000 milesCA

VEHICLE WILL NOT STOP WHEN THE BRAKES ARE APPLIED, RESULTING IN A COLLISION.*AK...NO INJURIES REPORTED. VEHICLE WAS TOTALED. *AK *SB

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Filed May 10, 2005140,655 milesNJ

I WAS SLOWING DOWN TO COME TO A STOP WHEN MY BRAKES FAILED. THE MORE I PRESSED MY BRAKES THE FASTER THE TRUCK STARTED TO ACCELERATE AND THE REAR TIRES WERE SPINNING. I PRESSED THE EMERGENCY BRAKES AND THEY FAILED ALSO. THE ONLY WAY OF STOPPING WAS FOR ME TO THROW IT IN PARK. WHILE TRYING TO BRAKE THE BRAKE WENT TO THE FLOOR.

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Filed Apr 12, 2005151,041 milesMD

WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES A LOUD NOISE WAS PRODUCED. AS A RESULT, THE ABS SENSOR LIGHT STAYED ON. A RECALL WAS ISSUED. HOWEVER, THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED DUE TO VIN. *AK

Air Bags › FrontalCrash2 injured
Filed Mar 30, 2005257,000 milesAR

WHILE DRIVING AT 30 MPH CONSUMER'S VEHICLE WAS INVOLVED IN A COLLISION. UPON IMPACT, AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. VEHICLE WAS TOTALED.*AK

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Filed Mar 9, 200597,220 milesVA

THE ABS WARNING LIGHT CAME ON. OWNER APPLIED THE BRAKES, BUT THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP. OWNER APPLIED THE EMERGENCY BRAKE AND THE VEHICLE CAME TO A STOP. OWNER PULLED THE BRAKE UP TO RELEASE THE EMERGENCY, BUT THE EMERGENCY BRAKE LIGHT STAYED ON. OWNER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER, AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE BRAKE HYDRAULIC WAS DEFECTIVE. *AK

Power TrainFire
Filed Feb 24, 2005WA

CONSUMER COMPLAINT ABOUT 1995 CHEVROLET BLAZER DESIGN FLAW. *BF THE TRANSMISSION WAS INSTALLED BUT THE SEAL WAS NOT REPLACED BECAUSE THE MANUAL DID NOT STATE TO DO SO. THE VEHICLE CAUGHT FIRE WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION. TRANSMISSION FLUID HAD GONE INTO THE TRANSFER CASE WHEN THE SEAL WAS NO GOOD THEN HAD GONE INTO THE VENT TUBE WAS DESIGNED, AND PLACED OVER THE HOT MANIFOLD AND EXHAUST SYSTEM WHICH CAUSED THE FIRE. *SC

Power Train › Transfer Case (4-wheel Drive)Fire
Filed Jan 31, 2005WA

WHILE DRIVING VEHICLE CAUGHT ON FIRE. INVESTIGATION SHOWED THAT FLUID WAS OVERFLOWING OUT OF THE TRANSFER CASE AND TRAVELING TO THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER AND EXHAUST SYSTEM.*AK THE FLUID OVERFLOWED TO THE HOT MANIFOLD AND EXHAUST SYSTEM CAUSING THE FIRE. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE TRANSMISSION WAS REPLACED AND THE SEAL THAT CONNECTS THE TRANSFER CASE WAS NOT REPLACED. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT WHEN THE FLAMMABLE LIQUID FROM THE TRANSMISSION WENT INTO THE TRANSFER CASE THE SEAL GAVE WAY. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE PLACEMENT OF THE VENT TUBE OVER THE HOT EXHAUST IS A DANGEROUS DESIGN FLAW AND SHOULD BE RECALLED DUE TO FIRE HAZARD. THE CONSUMER STATED THE SEAL WAS REPLACED AND SHE WAS OVERCHARGED. THE CONSUMER WOULD LIKE TO BE REIMBURSED FOR THE COST OF THE REPAIR. THE CONSUMER STATED THAT IF SHE DOES NOT HEAR THE PUBLIC ADDRESS OF THIS PROBLEM ON THE NEWS SHE WILL TAKE THE ISSUE TO THE NEWS WIRE PERSONALLY. *TC

Service Brakes, Air › Antilock
Filed Jan 3, 2005122,363 milesFL

ABS BRAKES FAILS TO STOP THE SUV/BLAZER WHEN I NEED TO BRAKE IN A HURRY, BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR AND IT MAKES STRANGE NOISE, IT TAKES A LONG DISTANCE TO STOP.*AK

Visibility › Rearview Mirrors/Devices › Exterior
Filed Nov 29, 2004OH

PASSENGER SIDE MIRROR FELL OFF DOOR WHILE DRIVING, AND WAS HANGING BY THE ELECTRICAL WIRES. I AM AWARE OF ANOTHER NEWER MODEL BLAZER WHICH HAD THE SAME THING HAPPEN. I ALSO HAVE NOTICED SEVERAL BLAZERS IN MY AREA WITH NO MIRROR ON THE PASSENGER SIDE DOOR AND HAVE EVEN SEEN BOTH MIRRORS GONE. CURRENTLY I'M NOTICING THE DRIVER'S SIDE MIRROR BEGINNING TO SHAKE WHILE DRIVING. I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP TO INVESTIGATE AND WAS TOLD THERE WERE NO RECALLS OR RECORDED RELATED INCIDENTS. THAT SAME PERSON THEN TOLD ME A CALL JUST CAME IN PRIOR TO MINE ASKING ABOUT THE SAME PROBLEM.*AK

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Filed Oct 5, 2004106,549 milesNY

LOSS OF BRAKES AFTER HITTING A POTHOLE IN THE ROAD. VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP. ALSO ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS, GOING FROM GRASS TO DIRT ROAD IN 2 WHEEL DRIVE MODE, ABS TOOK OVER AND CAUSED SEVERE INCREASE IN BRAKING DISTANCE. 1995, CHEVROLET, BLAZER HAS A RECALL FOR THIS PROBLEM BUT GM SAID MY VIN# [XXX] WAS NOT ON THE RECALL LIST.*AK UPDATED 07/24/2012 *JS INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

Engine and Engine Cooling
Filed Sep 29, 2004130,000 milesMI

ENGINE COMPARTMENT PLASTIC SHIELD DISINTEGRATED. AS A RESULT, WATER LEAKED INTO THE VEHICLE. *AK *TC

Fuel System, Gasoline › Fuel Injection System
Filed Sep 27, 2004180,000 milesTN

CONSUMER COMPLAINED ABOUT A FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM PROBLEM. CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND RECEIVED MANY DIFFERENT STORIES OF REMEDY. CONSUMER ASKED THE DEALER TO CHECK THE FUEL TANK, AND THE DEALER REFUSED TO CHECK IT. THEN, CONSUMER CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER, AND WAS TOLD BY THE MANUFACTURER THAT DEALERSHIPS WERE INDEPENDENTLY OWNED, AND THERE WAS NOTHING THEY COULD DO. *AK

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Filed Aug 31, 200482,000 milesNJ

INTERMITTENTLY THE BRAKE PEDAL IS DEPRESSED, MOSTLY IN A PANIC SITUATION, BRAKE FEELS ENGAGED, BUT INSTEAD A MOANING NOISE OCCURS, FOLLOWED BY BRAKE FAILURE. VEHICLE LIKE IT'S SKIDDING ON ICE. WHEN THIS OCCURS CONSUMER HAS TO BUMP THE BRAKE PEDAL FOR THE BRAKES TO ENGAGE. THE ENTIRE BRAKING SYSTEM AND THE FRONT END WERE REPLACED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. ABS RECALL 99V193000 WAS ISSUED ON THIS PROBLEM, BUT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. *AK

Vehicle Speed Control › Linkages
Filed Aug 17, 200455,995 milesPA

THROTTLE CONTROL LINKAGES STUCK WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH OR MORE. DEALER WAS NOT NOTIFIED AT THIS TIME. *AK

Suspension › Front › Control Arm › Lower Ball Joint
Filed Aug 16, 2004OH

WHILE DRIVING AT ANY SPEED, THE CONSUMER HEARD A LOUD NOISE AND THE VEHICLE STARTED TO VIBRATE UNCONTROLLABLY. THE CONSUMER WAS ABLE TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND DROVE IT TO A PRIVATE MECHANIC FOR INSPECTION. THE MECHANIC INFORMED THE CONSUMER THAT THE UPPER AND LOWER BALL JOINTS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS. *JB

Structure › Body › BumpersCrashFire
Filed Jul 25, 2004AZ

DON'T YOU THINK IT IS THE LEGAL AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY OF YOUR AGENCY TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL CAR AND TRUCK AND SUV BUMPERS MEET TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF ALL THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY?*AK

Engine and Engine Cooling › Cooling System
Filed Jul 17, 2004OR

ONE OF THE OIL COOLER HOSES CAME OFF THE CRIMP CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO LOSE ALL OIL AND PRESSURE. VEHICLE SHUT DOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF A CURVE, CAUSING OWNER TO LOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE (BUT LUCKILY REGAIN IT). ENGINE IS A COMPLETE LOSS AND WILL BE COSTING US THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO REPLACE. THIS REALLY SEEMS TO BE A MANUFACTURER ISSUE, AS THE CRIMP METHOD USED FOR THIS HIGH PRESSURE (AND HIGHLY IMPORTANT) HOSE IS OF A TYPE THAT DOES NOT SEEM RELIABLE. THE SHOP THAT IS HOLDING OUR CAR, PENDING OUR DECISION ON WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT THIS PROBLEM, HAS INDICATED THEY HAVE HAD ONE OR TWO OTHER BLAZERS IN THEIR SHOP IN THE LAST YEAR WITH THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRING - AND THAT THEY NOTED AT THE TIME THAT THE CRIMP METHOD, WITHOUT BARBS TO GIVE EXTRA GRAB TO THE HOSE - SEEMS TO BE THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR. I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO SEE CHEVROLET TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS MANUFACTURING DEFECT - IF THE HOSE HAD BEEN ATTACHED IN A RELIABLE METHOD, THIS PROBLEM WOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED. THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS.*AK

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Pedals and Linkages
Filed Jun 10, 2004PA

THE BRAKE PEDAL PIVOT BOLT WAS STARTED IN THE WELD NUT, BUT WAS NOT TORQUED CORRECTLY CAUSING THE BOLT TO DISENGAGE FROM THE WELD NUT. HOWEVER, THIS IS A RECALL. THE RECALL # IS 94V242000. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION. ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE CORRECT DATE OF INCIDENT.*AK

Service Brakes, HydraulicCrash
Filed Jun 4, 200443,500 milesNJ

ABS MALFUNCTIONED, RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. ABS RECALL 99I006000 WAS ISSUED, BUT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. *AK THE CONSUMER WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT ON 4/16/04 BECAUSE HE WAS NOT ABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. HE SPENT ALOT OF MONEY TRYING TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE BUT THE BRAKES ARE STILL NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. *NM

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Foundation Components › Disc › Rotor
Filed Jun 1, 2004111,000 milesPA

WHILE DRIVING BRAKE ROTORS WERE WARPED. THIS CAUSED THE STEERING WHEEL TO SHIMMY. DEALERSHIP WAS NOTIFIED, BUT DID NOT RESOLVE THE PROBLEM. *AK

Electrical System
Filed May 31, 2004143,000 milesSC

I HAD BARELY HAD THE VEHICLE 24 HOURS WHEN IT SHUT OFF ON ME AND THE "CHECK GAUGES" LIGHT CAME ON. THERE SEEMS TO BE ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS WITH THE VEHICLE. I HAD IT TOWED BACK TO THE DEALER SINCE I HAD ONLY HAD IT LESS THA 24 HOURS.*AK

Electrical System › Ignition › SwitchFire
Filed May 26, 2004NY

THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED WHEN THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY CAUGHT ON FIRE. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WAS CALLED OUT TO EXTINGUISHED THE FIRE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. *NM

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Filed Apr 14, 2004NJ

WHILE DRIVING AT 30 MPH AND APPLYING THE BRAKES. PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR, AND BRAKES FAILED. RESULTING IN EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE. *AK

Complaints 1-50 of 1,224, newest first, reproduced as filed.

Across model years

Worst on record: 1995
YearComplaintsRecallsFiresDeathsAssessment
20261000Routine
202535100Routine
202453100Routine
202344200Routine
202255110Routine
2021141110Routine
2020224310Above average
2019189200Routine
20085000Routine
20079000Routine
200619010Routine
200515020Routine
200450100Routine
200377100Routine
2002246260Above average
2001326352Fatalities reported
2000589472Fatalities reported
1999436090Above average
199871631513Fatalities reported
19977687284Fatalities reported
19961,15311322Fatalities reported
1995 — this page1,22411260High concern
1994620776Fatalities reported
19935117121Fatalities reported
1992278691Fatalities reported
19912227150Above average
199032470Routine

Compare every Blazer year →

1995 Chevrolet Blazer: questions buyers ask

Is the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer a good car?

Going by the federal record, it is one of the Blazer years to avoid: owners filed 1,224 complaints, 5.0 times as many as a typical Blazer year. The most common complaint is about the brakes (39%).

What is the most common problem with the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer?

The brakes: 482 of the 1,224 complaints (39%) are about it. Owners most often say it loses its brakes or the pedal sinks (29%), knocks, grinds or clunks (4%) and sets off warning lights on the dash (3%). The typical report comes at 122,363 miles.

How many recalls does the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer have?

11 safety recalls on file with NHTSA, the most recent filed Apr 7, 2009. The largest, 99I006000, covered 2,400,000 vehicles. Recall repairs are free at a dealer; whether a specific car still has one open depends on its VIN.

At what mileage do 1995 Chevrolet Blazer problems start?

Half of the complaints that record an odometer reading came in before 98,000 miles. For the brakes the midpoint is 122,363 miles.

Has NHTSA investigated the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer?

Yes, 8 times. The latest, EA02006 ("WINDSHIELD WIPER FAILURE"), was opened May 31, 2002 and closed Jul 23, 2003.

Are there service bulletins for the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer?

The manufacturer filed 51 technical service bulletins and other notices for it with NHTSA, most of them about the body and frame (8), the fuel system (5) and the engine (5). A bulletin is a repair instruction to dealers, not a recall: the fix is usually free only under warranty.

Reading this record

A high number of complaints describe fires or crashes.

Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Recall repairs are free for as long as the recall stands. Check whether a specific car still has open work at NHTSA's VIN lookup.

Most recent recall on file: Apr 7, 2009. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.