2026 Tesla Model Y

Defect. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2026 Model Y vehicles. One or more front suspension lateral link fasteners may not have been properly tightened, allowing the lateral link to loosen or separate from the sub-frame.

Risk. A lateral link separation could shift the wheel alignment, causing a loss of vehicle control and increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy. Tesla Service will tighten or replace the fasteners and check wheel the alignment, free of charge. In addition, Tesla Service will replace any related parts that may have been damaged as necessary. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed October 30, 2026. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-26-31-004.

Defect. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2026 Model Y and 2024 Model 3 vehicles. The vehicles were originally built for a foreign market and do not have knee air bags, may not be equipped with certain interior safety countermeasures, and may not have been tested for bumper impact resistance procedures. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard numbers, 208, "Occupant Crash Protection," 201, "Occupant Protection in Interior Impact," and Part 581, "Bumper Standards."

Risk. A noncompliant vehicle may have reduced occupant protections, increasing the risk of injury during a crash.

Remedy. Tesla will repurchase noncompliant vehicles currently registered in the United States, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed September 4, 2026. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752 or [email protected]. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-26-00-004.

Defect. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2025-2026 Model Y vehicles. The certification label may not have been installed. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of 49 C.F.R. Part 567, "Certification."

Risk. Missing weight information provided by the label may lead to unintentionally overloading the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy. Tesla Service will inspect and install a certification label as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed July 17, 2026. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-26-19-002.

Defect. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2025 Model 3 and 2026 Model Y vehicles. The battery pack contactors may fail, causing a loss of drive power.

Risk. A loss of drive power can increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy. Tesla Service will replace the battery pack contactors, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed December 9, 2025. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-25-16-005.

Defect. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2026 Model Y vehicles. The reverse lights may fail to illuminate while the vehicle is in reverse, due to a defect in the wiring. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 108, "Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment."

Risk. Reverse lights that fail to illuminate reduce visibility and may not alert pedestrians or other drivers that the vehicle is backing up, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy. Tesla Service will replace the reverse lights and reverse facia harness, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed November 26, 2025. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-25-17-011.

Defect. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2026 Model Y vehicles. The ring terminal of the horn ground wire may be improperly secured, allowing the circuit to open and preventing the horn from sounding.

Risk. An inoperable horn may prevent the driver from alerting other drivers as needed, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy. Tesla service will replace the steering wheel, free of charge. Owner notification letters were be mailed September 23, 2025. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-25-17-009.

Defect. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2026 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles. The fasteners attaching the seat back to the seat bottom may have been improperly tightened.

Risk. The seat may not properly restrain the occupant, increasing the risk of injury during a crash.

Remedy. Tesla Service Centers will inspect and tighten or replace the seat assembly fasteners as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed August 16, 2025. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-25-13-003.

Defect. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2026 Model Y vehicles. The hose connector may block the windshield washer nozzles, preventing washer fluid from reaching the windshield. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 104, "Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems."

Risk. The inability to clean the windshield reduces the driver’s visibility and increases the risk of a crash.

Remedy. Tesla service will inspect and replace the wiper arm elbow connector as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed July 25, 2025. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-25-20-001.

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is opening this Engineering Analysis to evaluate Tesla’s Full Self Driving Beta and Full Self Driving (Supervised) (collectively, FSD) degradation detection system. The focus of this investigation will be to assess the system’s ability, when encountering reduced roadway visibility conditions, to detect degradation and alert the driver with sufficient time to respond. ODI will evaluate the performance of FSD in degraded roadway conditions and the updates or modifications by Tesla to the degradation detection system, including the timing, purpose, and …

The Office of Defects Investigation (“ODI”) is opening this Preliminary Evaluation (PE) to assess the scope, frequency, and potential safety consequences of FSD executing driving maneuvers that constitute traffic safety violations. This investigation concerns versions of FSD that Tesla has labeled as "FSD (Supervised)" and "FSD (Beta)." Tesla characterizes FSD as an SAE Level 2 partial automation system requiring a fully attentive driver who is engaged in the driving task at all times. Level 2 partial automation systems are designed to support and assist the driver in performing certain aspects …

The Office of Defects Investigation (“ODI”) has identified numerous incident reports submitted by Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) in response to Standing General Order 2021-01 (the “SGO”), in which the reported crashes occurred several months or more before the dates of the reports. The majority of these reports involved crashes in which the Standing General Order in place at the time required a report to be submitted within one or five days of Tesla receiving notice of the crash. When the reports were submitted, Tesla submitted them in one of two ways. Many of the reports were submitted as part of a …

On January 6, 2025, the Office of Defects Investigations (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation 24003 (PE24033) to investigate Actually Smart Summon (Summon) sessions resulting in crashes during active sessions. According to Tesla, Summon is a short-distance SAE Level 2 system, controlled by the user from a cell phone within a certain distance and intended for use in parking lots and on private property. ODI analyzed complaint data provided by Tesla as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers to identify Summon incidents resulting in crashes. ODI's analysis indicates that almost all …

The company markets the Quick Bandit license plate holder for the Tesla Model Y 2026 Juniper, stating it "does not obstruct Autopilot front camera or sensors." After installing the holder, during FSD (self-driving mode), the Tesla began stopping suddenly on roads and freeways. After stopping, the car will not move because the front camera is seeing non-existent people, as indicated on the screen display. This is a dangerous situation, which could result in a rear-ending accident. After many visits to the Tesla service department, it was diagnosed that the vertical brackets of the holder are causing the cameras to see non-existent pedestrians. I've reported the issue to Teslarati customer service and sent pictures of the problem, but they've responded only once and provided no resolution. They are now ignoring my emails and will not post my reviews. Their product is causing a serious road hazard.

I am reporting a serious safety incident involving my 2026 Tesla Model Y while using Full Self-Driving (Supervised). While my vehicle was making a left turn with FSD engaged, the system unexpectedly disengaged midway through the maneuver. Instead of completing the left turn, the vehicle continued traveling straight toward a parked car. I immediately attempted to take control and correct the vehicle's direction, but there was insufficient time to avoid the collision. I received no apparent advance warning before the disengagement. Additionally, the forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking systems did not appear to activate or intervene before impact. The collision caused significant damage to the front passenger-side bumper of my Tesla, requiring the vehicle to be towed. The vehicle subsequently underwent repairs, leaving me without transportation for approximately one month. I had been using Tesla's FSD system regularly for several months before this incident. I reported the incident to Tesla and contacted its FSD malfunction team, but I have not received a response, investigation findings, or an explanation regarding the unexpected disengagement and apparent lack of collision avoidance intervention. I am concerned that FSD may unexpectedly disengage during an active turning maneuver without sufficient advance warning or time for the driver to react. The apparent lack of collision warning or automatic emergency braking intervention further raises concerns abo

On October 27, 2026, my 2026 Tesla Model Y experienced a serious front hood safety incident. Before the incident, the hood would not fully latch closed and could not be reopened using the touchscreen or Tesla app. The vehicle displayed a hood warning and restricted acceleration. I contacted Tesla Roadside Assistance but was informed that complimentary towing was unavailable because the vehicle was considered drivable. I proceeded toward Tesla for service at a very low speed, approximately 16 mph or less. While traveling downhill on the freeway, the vehicle briefly reached approximately 30 mph. The hood suddenly flew open and struck the windshield, causing extensive cracking and severely compromising visibility. Fortunately, no one was injured. After the incident, the responding police officer observed that the hood could latch closed, although it had been unable to close properly beforehand. The vehicle was delivered to a Tesla-owned Collision Center and has since been disassembled. I have requested preservation of the original components, diagnostic data, and inspection records. The exact cause remains unknown, and Tesla's technical investigation is pending. I am concerned about a possible failure of the primary or secondary hood latch mechanism. This incident created a serious risk of losing visibility and control of the vehicle. I request that NHTSA investigate whether this represents a potential safety defect that could affect other Model Y vehicles.

On October 20, 2026, at approximately 8:14 PM, I was starting a drive from a parked position in a parking garage. I engaged Full Self-Driving (Supervised), software version 14.3.10. Within less than 2 seconds of engagement, the vehicle moved forward and struck a concrete support pillar. I was seated in the driver's seat and supervising, but the vehicle hit the pillar before I could intervene. Failed systems: FSD (Supervised) steered the vehicle into a stationary, clearly visible obstacle. Automatic emergency braking did not prevent the collision. Safety risk: The vehicle drove into a fixed structure in a garage used by pedestrians and other vehicles. The same behavior near a pedestrian could cause serious injury. [No one was injured.] Warnings before the crash: None Evidence: I have the vehicle's dashcam footage of the collision. The clip's embedded telemetry shows FSD (Supervised) was active at the moment of impact. Footage is available on request. Inspection: The vehicle was inspected by the insurer and repaired at a Tesla-approved collision center. The problem has not been reproduced by a service center. The vehicle is available for inspection on request.

On October 28, 2026 at about 3:57 PM EDT, my 2026 Tesla Model Y (Long Range RWD) was operating on Full Self-Driving (Supervised) as it turned left into our residential driveway in Watkinsville, GA. A family member's parked Subaru Forester was on the left side of the driveway with its right rear passenger door standing open. An adult was leaning into that doorway and a child was standing beside the car. The Tesla's dashcam (left pillar camera) shows the open door clearly in view for 6 to 8 seconds before contact. Despite this, Full Self-Driving did not stop or steer away. It slowed to about 2 mph but kept creeping forward alongside the Subaru, and the Tesla's left rear quarter panel struck the edge of the open door. The vehicle data export shows Full Self-Driving active and steering throughout, with no accelerator or brake input from me and near-zero steering torque from the driver. No forward collision warning or automatic emergency braking event was recorded. I braked about 5 seconds after contact, which disengaged Full Self-Driving. No one was injured, but a person was standing in the door opening the car struck. The Tesla has a V-shaped dent and gouge in the left rear quarter panel, with the paint cut through. Estimated repair cost is over $5,000. I expected the system to detect a stationary open door with a person in it and either stop or steer around it. I have the dashcam footage from all six cameras and Tesla's vehicle data export, and can provide both.

Driver seat frame, cushion and backrest moves from side to side during cornering. This issue has gradually gotten worse, to a point that just shifting my body weight on the seat is able to move it. Tesla service center says it is within specification, but it does not feel safe.

In regards to degradiation of driveway battery in my Tesla model Y I have lost 7.3 % of range vehicle now has 21,601 miles. The battery is at 90% health that the on board diagnosis has computed I’ve owned this Teslafor 18 months normal driving 17 times at the supercharger hall charging at level two at home. I feel that this battery pack made by Panasonic is degrading faster than expected, even though I have no faults or alerts. I believe this is unacceptable. I am hearing the same across the country. I have reported it to the Tesla service team and they say this is normal. I wish for a recall and or replacement.

The contact owns a 2026 Tesla Model Y. The contact stated that while driving with the FSD engaged at approximately 2 MPH, while approaching a stop sign, the vehicle failed to come to a complete stop. In addition, the nearby board patrol witnessed the event and was able to advise the contact to stop the vehicle. The brake pedal was depressed, and the vehicle came to a stop. The failure mileage was approximately 96,038.

The contact owns a 2026 Tesla Model Y. The contact stated that for children or individuals with a small frame, the rear seat belt rode up across the neck instead of resting across the chest. The contact stated that the issue was a safety hazard and might cause a choking issue in the event of a crash. The dealer was contacted and stated there was no way to adjust the seat belt. The manufacturer was contacted by phone and made aware of the failure.

Subject: Suspected Sudden Unintended Acceleration While Reversing — Tesla Collision on October 25, 2026 On October 25, 2026, at approximately 11:00 AM Pacific Time, I experienced an unexpected acceleration incident while reversing my Tesla on my property. I was reversing slowly when the vehicle lightly contacted another car that I own. Immediately afterward, the Tesla unexpectedly accelerated backward at a much higher speed and struck my garage with considerable force. The garage impact brought the Tesla to a complete stop. The vehicle subsequently moved forward and stopped. Fortunately, nobody was in the vehicle's path. However, the incident created a serious risk of injury, particularly if children or pedestrians had been nearby. I visited a Tesla Service Center after the incident. I was instructed to obtain a Tesla privacy data report, but I have not yet received a technical explanation. My preliminary review of Tesla's vehicle data indicates that the recorded accelerator signal increased from approximately 4.4% to 100%, reverse speed reached approximately 12.4 mph, and a crash-related event and braking activity were registered. I do not remember my exact foot position during the incident. I cannot determine whether the acceleration was caused by physical pedal input, an electronic or mechanical fault, or another factor. I am requesting that NHTSA review this incident as a potential vehicle safety concern. My primary objective is to understand what happened and help preven

The tesla while on FSD navigated me to Truck Ramp. I didn't have time to react. It didn't even warn. The car bounced 3 times and I had to tow it out. I didn't find the way to contact the service/customer care as it was Sunday. None of the other dealers wanted to touch tesla. The service availability is 24 days out, so for something this critical, there should be better customer service, accountability. I still need to pay for self-driving. I can't trust self driving at highway or night due to this. The tow operator said that he towed 7 tesla in last 3 months at exact same location.

I am reporting a serious safety concern involving my 2026 Tesla Model Y AWD. VIN: [XXX] Mileage: Approximately 16,000 miles At approximately 8:00 a.m. XXX Monday, I was driving manually uphill in bright sunlight. Sun glare affected my visibility, and I did not notice that the vehicle ahead had stopped. I did not receive a forward-collision warning before my Tesla struck the vehicle in front at approximately 25 mph. After the first impact, I felt the steering wheel move by itself. The vehicle then moved sideways and struck a tree. The resulting damage includes the front bumper, hood, front wheel area, and left-front door. The vehicle is undrivable. The airbags did not deploy. I am requesting a formal safety investigation into the unexpected steering movement, the absence of a forward-collision warning, and the vehicle's behavior after the first impact. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

On October 24, 2026, while washing my nearly new 2026 Tesla Model Y, I found the brake fluid reservoir cap loose in the windshield cowl area. I took delivery on October 1, 2026. The vehicle had approximately 529 miles when presented to Tesla Service Fremont that day. Tesla's repair invoice confirms that the brake fluid reservoir cap was found on the windshield cowl. It states that the technician inspected the frunk interior for other missing components, found none, performed a brake fluid test and found no moisture, and reinstalled the reservoir cap. I have retained the repair invoice. My safety concern is possible exposure of the brake fluid reservoir to moisture, wash water or debris while the cap was not installed. I do not know when the cap came off or whether it was properly installed at delivery. Contamination and any resulting internal damage have not been established. The invoice does not specify the reservoir's condition when inspected, the test method or numerical results. I am seeking clarification and a technical review of whether further action is needed. I am reporting a potential brake-system assembly or delivery-quality issue for safety review. I am not claiming that a crash or actual loss of braking occurred. The cause, exposure duration and prior warning-lamp status are UNKNOWN.

My 2026 Tesla Model Y, delivered in June 2025 with about 93,000 miles, has tire pressure monitoring (TPMS) sensors whose batteries are failing early. In the vehicle's service menu, all four sensors read below 2.5 volts, the level the car itself flags as low. Two sensors haven't reported in several days, and one only reports about every other day, so the car can't reliably warn me about low tire pressure. That's a safety concern, especially since I drive about 70,000 highway miles a year. Tesla Service Bulletin SB‑25‑34‑003 (Dec 12, 2025) describes this exact problem on 2026 Model Y vehicles, saying the TPMS sensor battery may drain at an accelerated rate. But the service center told me my VIN isn't included in that bulletin, so the repair would be at my cost. Sensors that are only about 16 months old shouldn't be failing like this. I'm asking that this be reviewed and that the bulletin be expanded to cover affected vehicles like mine.

While using Full Self-Driving (Supervised), the vehicle drove appropriately on [XXX] through the school zone, stopped at the traffic light, and made a right turn onto [XXX]. Immediately after the turn the vehicle accelerated rapidly, changed into the left/inside lane, and reached 46 mph in the active 20 mph school zone. I was pulled over; the officer’s notes state actual speed 46 mph, active 20 mph school zone, inside lane pulling away from all traffic. The acceleration happened extremely quickly. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

My Tesla, operating on FSD V14, has repeatedly crossed double solid lines to exit the HOV lane on [XXX] in Houston, Texas, where lane changes are prohibited. This has occurred multiple times in both directions: southbound near [XXX] and northbound near [XXX]. On [XXX], while traveling northbound, FSD suddenly crossed the double solid lines into regular traffic without any lane-change command from me. The maneuver happened so quickly that I could not intervene. This is a recurring safety issue, not an isolated incident. I have reported similar incidents multiple times through Tesla's in-car feedback system using the "Critical" option. I am concerned that this unpredictable behavior could cause a collision or traffic violation. I request an investigation into this recurring FSD safety issue. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system includes Speed Profiles labeled “Hurry” and “Mad Max.” Both profiles are programmed to ignore and exceed posted speed limits. Mad Max additionally causes the vehicle to zigzag around slower traffic with frequent, unnecessary lane changes. These software design choices create an unreasonable risk to public safety by increasing speed-related crash risk and by introducing unpredictable movements that affect surrounding traffic. Higher speeds reduce available reaction time and increase stopping distances. Aggressive weaving forces other drivers to react, raising the chance of collisions. I assert that, in the interest of highway safety, the Hurry and Mad Max profiles must be eliminated so driver cannot exceed posted speed limits. Only a single speed profile that obeys posted speed limits should remain. I further recommend the return of the previous right-scroll-wheel speed adjustment feature. This would allow drivers to set a precise maximum speed and to travel below the posted limit when conditions make doing so the safer and more prudent choice. The vehicle is available for inspection. This complaint concerns a intentional software design that exposes the driver, passengers, and other road users at elevated and unnecessary risk.

I am formally requesting an investigation and corrective software update addressing Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) improperly navigating into closed HOV/express lanes. On October 14, 2026, at approximately 5:19 PM, my Tesla was operating with FSD engaged, Mad Max mode selected, and HOV lane navigation enabled. The vehicle entered a closed Georgia Peach Pass express lane, passed the first security barrier, and subsequently collided with a second barrier despite my attempt to intervene by braking. The collision shattered my windshield, damaged the windshield frame, and caused minor physical injuries. My primary concern is that FSD failed to recognize or appropriately respond to a physically closed express lane. This presents a potentially serious safety hazard for other Tesla drivers and surrounding motorists.

Component or System: Hands-free liftgate auto-open feature (ultrasonic and camera-based proximity detection) on a 2026 Tesla Model Y.Description of the Incident: While the vehicle was parked in a tight residential garage on October 20, 2026, the hands-free liftgate auto-open feature activated automatically. The ultrasonic and camera-based proximity detection system behind the vehicle triggered the liftgate to open despite insufficient clearance. The liftgate struck the garage door, resulting in a section of paint chipping off the rear of the vehicle. Safety Risk: The unexpected automatic deployment of the liftgate in a confined space created a crush hazard between the liftgate and the garage door and could have struck a person standing nearby. The impact also damaged the vehicle’s rear structure; in a more severe case, this could compromise the liftgate’s ability to latch or seal properly.Reproduction / Confirmation Status: The issue has not yet been confirmed by a Tesla dealer or independent service center. A service request has been submitted to Tesla through the mobile app. The vehicle and the hands-free trunk system remain available for inspection upon request. Warning Signs: No warning lamps, chimes, or screen messages appeared before the event. The feature operated according to its designed behavior; the safety concern is that this normal behavior is unsafe in tight spaces with limited clearance.

Subject: Safety Complaint – Mandatory FSD Disengagement Feedback Obstructs the Touchscreen I am extremely frustrated with the mandatory feedback popup that appears every time I disengage Full Self-Driving (FSD) on my Tesla Model Y. Whenever I take manual control, the system immediately asks me to explain why I disengaged FSD. The popup remains on the touchscreen indefinitely unless I provide an answer, obstructing part of the display. This is not merely an inconvenience. It creates an unnecessary safety hazard. The moment I disengage FSD is precisely when I need to concentrate fully on driving. Forcing me to look at and interact with the touchscreen at that moment is distracting and potentially dangerous. Previously, I could dismiss the popup by quickly pressing the microphone button twice. However, recent software updates have removed this workaround, making the situation even more frustrating. I strongly request that Tesla: Provide an option to permanently disable mandatory FSD disengagement feedback. Allow drivers to dismiss the popup immediately without answering. Automatically remove the popup after a few seconds, or delay feedback requests until the vehicle is parked. Driver safety must take priority over Tesla's data collection. Please escalate this complaint to the FSD software development and vehicle safety teams and provide a response regarding how Tesla intends to address this issue.

I am filing this as a critical safety and accessibility complaint regarding repeated lockouts of my 2026 Model Y that trapped my disabled husband inside the vehicle and left both of us in dangerous situations. On October 21, 2026 I was walking to the car with both hands supporting my disabled husband, who requires physical assistance to walk. I pressed the open button on the door handle. The car locked me out because my phone was not connected as the key.I attempted to reconnect the phone key and could not. I then used the key card. The car continued to lock me out and repeatedly activated Sentry Mode. My husband’s wheelchair was locked inside the vehicle, so he had nowhere to sit while I tried to regain access.This created an immediate safety and accessibility hazard for both of us.Shortly after, a severe thunderstorm warning was issued with golf-ball-sized hail. I could not safely get my husband out of the car because I was afraid of being locked out again in the pouring rain and hail. We had to take refuge under a solar panel to wait out the storm.After the storm, I parked at a QT convenience store. The car was in Pet Mode. I took my phone inside the store and placed the key card on the pad, put the car in pet mode, expecting the car to remain accessible. Instead, the car locked me out again with my deaf and disabled husband inside. I had to bang on the window to get his attention. He does not know how to open the door manually. When he eventually managed to open it, the s

On Oct 19, 2026 at about 11:30 AM MT, my 2026 Tesla Model Y was operating on Full Self-Driving (Supervised) v14.3.12 (software 2026.38.5.1) and parking itself in my home garage. When the front wheels reached the rubber parking curb (wheel stop) at the front of the bay, the car did not stop. It drove into the curb, rolled back a few inches, then drove forward into it again, repeating this cycle several times until I pressed the brake. There was no damage and no injury, but the car repeatedly drove into a fixed obstacle under FSD and did not recognize the end of the parking space. Had a person, pet, or object been in front of the car, this could have caused harm. This follows other FSD parking problems on this car, including an illegal U-turn across a double yellow line on Sep 30, 2026 (FSD v14.3.10).

2024 Tesla Model Y (FSD Supervised) Location: T intersection where Katyland Drive ends at Hwy Blvd (US 90), Katy, TX Summary: While stopped at a red light in the left turn only lane, I activated Tesla Full Self Driving (FSD). When the light turned green, FSD activated the right turn signal and attempted a right turn into the right turn only lane. I intervened immediately to maintain lane compliance. A vehicle in the right lane had to adjust its turn trajectory to avoid conflict. Notes: The lane markings at this intersection clearly indicate “Left Only” and “Right Only.” The behavior appears reproducible, but I have not attempted to repeat it for safety reasons.

The car sways/oscillates side to side on highway speed. Took the car in for service on XXX. Multiple works performed on the car such as wheel alignment, Camera Pitch corrections, and tire balance. The service report indicated "The vehicle was released for the customer to monitor." After the car returned to me, I drove on the highway, on the way home, and found the oscillation amplitude has gotten worse. I reported the concern immediately to the [XXX] Tesla Service center. I was told they will call back. Subsequently I left two more urgent messages but never received a call back. This problem, per Tesla's message, asking the customer not to drive on highway due to safety concerns. Unfortunately, I am unable to avoid driving highway for practical daily purposes. On XXX, my daughter vomited (motion sickness) due to car oscillation side to side driving on highway XXX. The oscillation is especially bad when driving on [XXX]. This problem has made me and my family felt very unsafe to drive the car on highway which has prevented us from taking longer trips. This problem has prevented my for normal day to day driving needs and also affecting my family health. Tesla Technician personally ride with me and confirm the defect on XXX. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

I was on FSD on XXX [XXX] heading South on a clear day at about 3:16 PM. I was in the left lane going approx 75 mph. Without warning my car veered sharp left to try to enter a closed express lane. The up and down barrier smashed my front windshield. No one was hurt. I have reported this to Tesla. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

While I was driving in Full Self-driving (FSD) supervise mode, somewhere either in [XXX] or [XXX] on xxx the railroad crossing barriers were down. My 2026 Tesla Model Y (Premium) Dual Motor, FSD (supervise) maneuvered from left to right around the barriers. The barrier in my lane was down although there was an opening to the left, and there was an opening to the right after the track. The barriers in the opposite direction were arranged the same way. The maneuver happened so quickly that I had no time to react or took over manually. My girlfriend was with me and was so frightened by the incident and so with I. I'm reporting this incident for safety concern. I tried to report this incident to Tesla but I could not reach them. I hope you can call the attention of Tesla regarding this incident. Thanks, [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

Lane Departure Avoidance and Emergency Lane Departure Avoidance on my 2026 Tesla Model Y overcorrect. While driving normally within our lane, mostly on the highway, the system applies sudden steering that pushes the car toward the adjacent lane, nearly causing a collision. This happens on almost every drive, for both my husband and me. Since a recent software update, Lane Departure Avoidance resets to Assist at the start of every drive and Emergency Lane Departure Avoidance also reenables every drive. There is no way to keep these features off, so the only option is navigating touchscreen menus before each drive, which is itself a distraction. There have been no crashes or injuries so far, only near misses. Software version 2026.27.11. I request that NHTSA investigate these steering interventions and require Tesla to restore the option to keep these features off permanently.

On XXX, at about 4:59 PM, my 2026 Tesla Model Y (VIN [XXX], software 2026.27.11, FSD Supervised v14.3.10) was driving on Full Self-Driving (Supervised) near Past & Present, [XXX]. I was supervising, but I glanced at the navigation screen for a moment because the map was acting up. During that glance, the car turned right into a parking lot entrance that had a chain strung across it between two posts. It drove through the chain without slowing down or warning me. The chain damaged the front end, hood, fenders, roof glass, and roof frame. The repair estimate from Chantilly Auto Body CARSTAR is $8,303.17 (State Farm claim XXX), and the car will be in the shop for about a month. FSD didn't detect the chain, a common barrier at lot entrances, and it steered into a closed entrance. I reported this to Tesla by phone and was told I'd be contacted, but no one has followed up. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

On XXX, I was driving my 2026 Tesla Model Y All-Wheel Drive northbound on [XXX] toward the [XXX] exit in [XXX]. Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) was engaged as the vehicle entered a single-lane exit ramp with a curve. The FSD system did not slow the vehicle sufficiently for the curve. I intervened by applying the brakes, but the vehicle struck a reflector pole with its front bumper area. No other vehicle was involved. I am reporting a suspected malfunction of the FSD system’s ability to recognize roadway curvature, select an appropriate speed, and slow the vehicle in time to navigate the curve safely. This created a safety risk because, despite my intervention, a collision occurred. Under similar circumstances, the vehicle could strike other roadside objects or cause a more serious crash resulting in injuries. To my knowledge, a Tesla service center or independent facility has not reproduced or confirmed the suspected malfunction. I request that NHTSA investigate and that Tesla preserve and examine available vehicle telemetry, event logs, FSD status, vehicle speed, braking inputs, and driver-intervention data from the incident. Tesla Insurance reviewed the collision and determined me at fault. I disputed that determination and requested reconsideration. However, the insurance decision does not establish whether the FSD system malfunctioned. I did not receive a warning lamp or message alerting me in advance that the vehicle would not slow sufficiently for the curve. The problem b

The contact owns a 2026 Tesla Model Y. The contact stated that while driving at 65 MPH with full self-driving mode activated, an 18-wheeler with flashing headlights was travelling behind the contact's vehicle, which then unexpectedly veered to the shoulder of the road. The contact believed that the vehicle mistook the 18-wheeler for an emergency vehicle. The manufacturer was notified directly through the vehicle. The failure mileage was approximately 42,550.

The speed limit displayed to the driver is frequently incorrect. I believe this is a problem with all Teslas. Speaking as an aerospace engineer- as a rule it is better to provide no information to the pilot/driver than wrong information. FAA would never tolerate faulty instrumentation in an airplane, and we shouldn’t tolerate it in cars either. When the car is operating in FSD , it uses this wrong speed limit information. And operators driving manually will often rely on the displayed speed limit. Not good.

The contact owns a 2026 Tesla Model Y. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed with Self-Driving assist deactivated, the steering system became unresponsive. The vehicle unexpectedly accelerated and passed another vehicle on the right. The contact noted that with autonomous driving features turned off, the steering wheel continued to apply automated pressure. Upon releasing the wheel during a turn, the steering wheel locked in place without returning to center, requiring counter-steering effort to maintain vehicle control. The contact stated that the vehicle continued to provide autonomous steering assistance while automated driving modes were fully deactivated. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 800.

While driving on Colorado state highways with Traffic-Aware Cruise Control (and/or Autopilot) engaged, the vehicle repeatedly and unexpectedly decelerates rapidly from highway speeds of 75–80 mph down to approximately 45 mph. This occurs with no vehicles, obstacles, or other hazards visible ahead that would justify the slowdown. The deceleration is abrupt and feels aggressive. It has happened on multiple occasions during normal highway driving. I am forced to immediately override the system by pressing the accelerator to regain speed and avoid creating a hazard for traffic behind me. The issue occurs even in clear conditions with good visibility. This sudden braking creates a significant safety risk of being rear-ended by other drivers who are not expecting a vehicle to drop 30+ mph without warning. I have experienced this repeatedly and am concerned it is a safety defect with the vehicle’s cruise control / driver-assistance system. The problem occurs specifically when cruise control is active and does not appear to happen in the same way when I am fully controlling the throttle manually.

In my 2026 model Y I have to turn off lane departure assistance every time I want to drive the car. In my experience, this function has been dangerous. When I am passing a semi truck, I want to de- center myself away from the truck. Lane departure assistance forces my car towards the semi truck. It is terrifying. I’m not leaving the lane, I’m just trying to be at a safer distance as I’m passing the semi truck, and the car won’t let me when I have lane departure assistance on. I’ve been told that for the 2026 model Y, we are forced to turn it off before every drive whereas in other models, you could turn it off and it would remain off. Since when are we forced to have our car drive for us? I thought this was a choice, but apparently I am wrong.

While driving on freeway, driver door glass exploded and shattered into pieces without anything hitting it

Subject: Repeated FSD Attempts to Enter Closed Reversible Express Lanes – 2026 Tesla Model Y (HW4) I am submitting this complaint to report repeated potentially dangerous behavior involving Full Self-Driving (Supervised) on my 2026 Tesla Model Y equipped with Hardware 4 (HW4). On multiple occasions, FSD attempted to enter closed reversible express lanes along [XXX] in the [XXX] area. These express lanes operate in different directions depending on the time of day, with physical barriers controlling access. Despite the entrances being closed, FSD repeatedly attempted to enter them, requiring my immediate intervention to prevent potential collisions. Incident 1: XXX, approximately 10:45 PM Location: [XXX] FSD Version: 14.3.8 While traveling northbound on XXX, FSD indicated its intention to enter the express lanes through the [XXX] access point, which was closed at the time. I attempted multiple times to redirect the intended maneuver using the turn signal. Despite these attempts, FSD continued toward the entrance and was about to execute the turn when I took manual control to prevent the vehicle from entering the closed roadway. Incident 2: XXX, approximately 6:30 PM Locations: Big [XXX] Access and [XXX] [XXX] Access, [XXX] FSD Version: 14.3.10 While traveling southbound on XXX FSD signaled its intention to enter the express lanes through the [XXX] access point, which was closed. I intervened and disengaged FSD to prevent the vehicle from entering. After passing that entrance,

On October 7, 2026, at approximately 1:00 PM, I was driving through a gated entrance. Full Self-Driving (Supervised) was engaged when the vehicle made contact with the entrance gate arm/barrier, resulting in property damage. The apparent safety issue was that, while FSD (Supervised) was controlling the vehicle’s movement, the system did not prevent the vehicle from contacting the barrier. Afterward, the vehicle did not display or save the collision as a detected safety event. No one was injured. The incident nevertheless created a safety risk because the vehicle contacted a fixed barrier while the driver-assistance system was engaged. The issue has not yet been inspected or confirmed by Tesla or an independent service center. The vehicle is available for inspection upon request. I request that Tesla preserve and review any available data from the relevant time period, including FSD engagement status, vehicle speed, steering, braking and acceleration inputs, camera data, diagnostic logs, event data, and software-version information.

On XXX at approximately 1:18 PM Pacific Time in [XXX], my Tesla Model Y collided with a stationary metal post/barrier while operating under Full Self-Driving (Supervised). FSD was controlling the vehicle during a low-speed maneuver. The vehicle moved forward and struck the stationary obstacle. I did not intentionally press the accelerator, apply the brakes, or override the steering before impact. I applied the brakes only AFTER the collision. This was not a collision caused by my manually steering or accelerating the vehicle into the obstacle. I have preserved the original Tesla-recorded accident video, which displays the blue "Self-Driving" indicator during the relevant maneuver. Tesla's official vehicle data also records: 13:17:50.255 - ACTIVE_FSD 13:18:17.661 - Significant acceleration anomaly, approximately -7.29 m/s², consistent with a possible impact 13:18:18.268 - DRIVER_APPLYING_BRAKES 13:18:18.285 - FSD state UNAVAILABLE The suspected impact event occurred approximately 0.607 seconds before the recorded manual braking event. This supports my account that I braked in response to the collision, not before it. I am concerned that FSD failed to avoid a stationary obstacle while controlling the vehicle. I request that NHTSA investigate FSD obstacle detection, path planning, steering, propulsion and braking behavior, and whether adequate collision warnings were provided. I request preservation and examination of Tesla's complete FSD logs and an assessment of whether the au

This car's emergency lane assistance features are not helpful and have kicked in when not needed. This is disturbing, annoying and very dangerous, especially if there were icy/snow conditions on the road.

On XXX at approximately 3:52 PM, I was reversing my 2026 Tesla Model Y (VIN [XXX]) in the parking lot of the Tesla store/service center in [XXX], while Full Self-Driving (Supervised) was engaged. The vehicle failed to detect a stationary iron pole in the parking space and continued reversing into it, resulting in a collision that scuffed the paint and left a small dent on the rear lower bumper trim. The FSD system gave no warning and did not brake before impact. I have dashcam footage confirming FSD was active at the time of the collision. When I reported the incident to Tesla service staff at the location, they stated the collision was the driver's fault and denied any responsibility of the FSD system. I am concerned that FSD's failure to detect a large stationary metal obstacle at low speed indicates a safety defect in the driver-assistance system. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

Cut to 1,423 characters — fits with room to spare. Same facts, same careful framing, nothing lost. I'm reporting a recurring suspension/control-arm problem with 2026 Tesla vehicles. My 2026 Tesla developed suspension squeaking. Tesla fixed it under warranty. The same noise is back. While Tesla had my vehicle, they gave me a 2026 Model Y loaner — it makes the same noise. The problem is in multiple 2026 vehicles, not just mine. Tesla Service Bulletin SB-25-31-005 (May 8, 2026) covers rattling/knocking from the suspension on 2025+ Model Y, including front upper-control-arm mounts. Tesla has also documented upper-control-arm ball-joint creaking on Model 3/Y/X from water ingress and corrosion. NHTSA recalled 2020 Model Y for improperly secured front upper-control-arm hardware, stating separation could reduce steering ability and increase crash risk. I am not claiming my vehicle has that exact defect. I am asking NHTSA to determine whether these recurring symptoms indicate another suspension/control-arm defect. I transport a baby in this vehicle. A control-arm failure causing loss of steering could cause a crash with serious injury or death. Tesla now refuses warranty inspection unless I pay a diagnostic deposit first, even though they fixed the same issue under warranty before and the car is under the 4-year/50,000-mile warranty. I ask NHTSA to review this with other Tesla suspension complaints for a defect trend. I can provide VINs, service records, Tesla communications, and nois

While exiting a parking lot, FSD didnt detact the parking curb and initiated a reverse maneuver. The vehicle reversed over a parking curb, resulting in the rear mud flap and the surrounding body/wheel trim scraping against the curb. Both areas sustained visible damage.

The car is 4 months old (a 2026 Tesla y i bought new recently) — a rear hit my left tire with left axel brook not survive the crash it is any engineering problem with tesla manufactory this never happen this damage in my life time when i am rear ending how I report to tesl also i have clam with my insurance allstate under clam number 0840045827

On the morning of October 1, 2026, at approximately 9:30 AM, I was driving my 2026 Tesla Model Y forward out of my townhouse garage with FSD (Supervised) engaged. Immediately upon exiting, the vehicle steered toward a pillar located right at the garage door and struck it with the left side mirror, breaking off the entire lower mirror cover and leaving the mirror assembly crooked. There was no time to react or intervene — the impact occurred the instant the car cleared the garage. This happened the morning after a software update was installed. No injuries; damage is limited to the left exterior mirror. Tesla classified it as "external damage" (customer pay) with a $1,027.50 repair estimate. I am reporting this because the vehicle made an uncommanded steering maneuver toward a fixed obstacle in a low-speed residential setting with no opportunity for driver intervention.

I am reporting two nearly identical safety incidents involving Tesla Full Self-Driving (Supervised) on my Model Y. In both cases, the vehicle failed to detect a stationary concrete pillar and did not apply automatic braking, resulting in collisions. First Incident – September 16, 2026 While using FSD (Supervised) to reverse into my residential driveway, the system hesitated due to a parked vehicle on the left side. Instead of completing the reverse maneuver, the vehicle moved forward and struck a door pillar / gate post. I intervened and took over control only after the impact had already occurred. The vehicle sustained visible damage (scuff/dent on the side/rear area). Photos are available. Second Incident – October 4, 2026 Again using FSD (Supervised) in a similar residential parking/driveway situation, I believed the vehicle was reversing and would correct its path. Without any warning or automatic braking, the vehicle continued and struck a concrete pillar. I had essentially no time to react before contact. I stopped the vehicle after the impact. Additional damage occurred. Photos of the vehicle position relative to the pillar and the resulting damage are available.

My 2026 Tesla Model Y has repeatedly developed contamination/haze inside the enclosed forward-facing windshield camera area, resulting in camera visibility/cleaning warnings and potentially reduced availability or performance of driver-assistance features. Tesla has already cleaned the internal forward-camera/windshield area twice, but the condition continues to return. The contamination is located inside the camera enclosure/inboard windshield area and cannot be corrected through normal exterior vehicle cleaning. Tesla is now requesting approximately $60 to clean the area again rather than addressing why the contamination repeatedly develops. I am concerned that this is a recurring defect affecting forward-camera visibility rather than ordinary owner maintenance. The forward cameras are used by the vehicle’s driver-assistance systems. I am also aware of reports from other owners of newer Model Y vehicles experiencing recurring haze/contamination in this same enclosed camera area. I am requesting that NHTSA document and evaluate this issue for a possible defect trend in 2025+ Tesla Model Y vehicles.

This car was operating under "Full Self Driving (Supervised)", on [XXX] at [XXX], traveling on [XXX] near Thornton Gap. With no operator inputs, the car fully changed lanes to the left, crossing over the double-yellow line into the oncoming traffic lane. All four tires of the car crossed into the westbound lane before the car, still operating under Full Self Driving (Supervised) changed back into the eastbound lane. The operator of the car was prepared to take control, however without oncoming traffic at the time the car was allowed to complete the maneuvers. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

On [XXX], at approximately [XXX] PDT, I was parked in a parking lot in my 2026 Tesla Model Y (VIN: [XXX], approx. 9,416 miles). I engaged Full Self-Driving (Supervised) from a standstill. Without any manual steering input from me, the vehicle initiated a sudden sharp left turn on its own and struck a metal pole, causing approximately $12,000 in damage to the rear and quarter panels. No injuries occurred. The failed component is the FSD (Supervised) steering system. The vehicle was repaired at a Tesla collision center in September 2026 and is my daily driver; it is not available for extended physical inspection. All incident evidence — vehicle telemetry, Tesla privacy data logs, dashcam video, and collision center repair records — is preserved and available on request. My safety and the safety of others were put at risk because the vehicle executed an uncommanded sharp turn in a parking lot — an environment shared with pedestrians. Had a person been in the vehicle's path during the sudden maneuver, it could have caused serious injury. There was no opportunity to anticipate it. The problem has not been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center. I reported the incident to Tesla's vehicle safety team via a service log report; after 40+ days I have received no substantive response and no diagnosis beyond an offer to request my own data through the privacy portal. The vehicle was repaired at a Tesla collision center (body work only, no FSD diagnosis) and ass

On 8/29/2026 my 2026 Model Y was on FSD (Supervised) v14.3.8 (software 2026.26.6.5). Daylight, clear weather, dry road. My eyes were on the road and I received no attention alerts. While in an open lane, FSD signaled and abruptly changed lanes into a closed express lane entrance blocked by lowered gate arms with reflectors and a flag. The lane change and impact happened too fast to react. There was no collision warning or alert and no braking. It hit the first arm without slowing. The arm shattered the windshield, sending glass into the cabin, then went over the hood. The car never registered the impact. With no alert or braking, it kept going at the same speed toward the remaining arms until I took over and steered away, with no visibility through the windshield. Sunglasses and a face covering are the only reason glass did not reach my eyes. I had minor skin irritation on one arm. The responding officer said he knew what happened on sight. He said Teslas on FSD crash through the arms at this exact location regularly when the express lanes are closed because they do not recognize them, and that he often writes these crash reports there. The collision repair technician said he has seen a large increase in Teslas crashing through barrier arms since July 2026 and believes a software update caused a regression in barrier arm recognition. I believe Avoid Tolls/HOV was enabled at the time, though I am not 100% certain. It is enabled now, and FSD still routes my car into the express

On [XXX] at approx [XXX] I was using Teslas FSD to return home from NYC to NJ. I entered [XXX] at [XXX] and around [XXX] the car suddenly entered a ramp marked with a Do Not Enter sign and a red light. It was too quick to disengage and move to the left (green lit) ramp. Luckily there were no issues on the closed ramp (possibly it was closed in preparation for construction later that night). But I was very concerned that FSD could make this mistake. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)