THE REAR SWING ARM ON MY FLHTC ELECTRA-GLIDE CRACKED THROUGH THE CENTER OF THE LEFT AXLE BOLT HOLE. THE BROKEN PART WAS HELD ON BY THE REAR LEFT SHOCK. THE REAR WHEEL STAYED ON ONLY BECAUSE THE DRIVE BELT WAS HOLDING IT IN PLACE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A ROUTINE TIRE CHANGE WHILE TRAVELING. THE MILEAGE ON MY BIKE WAS OVER 30,000 MILES. DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES, I HAD TO HAVE THE PART WELDED, IN ORDER TO CONTINUE MY TRIP. WHILE SHOPPING FOR REPLACEMENT PARTS, I LEARNED THIS TYPE OF FAILURE IS BECOMING COMMON FOR '99 AND 2000 YEAR CYCLES WITH OVER 30,000 MILES. I FOUND NUMEROUS REFERENCES TO THIS FAILURE ON THE INTERNET. I'VE ALSO LEARNED THAT HARLEY DAVIDSON HAS SINCE MODIFIED THE LOCATION OF THE AXLE TO INCLUDE SOLID STEEL AT THE FAILURE SITE, WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY A HOLLOW PIECE OF TUBULAR STEEL. THIS MODIFICATION OCCURRED IN 2002 AND NEWER CYCLES. I BELIEVE THIS IS A SILENT ADMISSION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF A DESIGN FLAW. I HAVE CONTACTED THE COMPANY TO IN ORDER TO HAVE THE SWING ARM REPLACED WITH A MORE STABLE PART, BUT WAS TOLD THE FAILURE COULD BE OPERATOR ERROR, OR DRIVING THE BIKE IMPROPERLY, NOT A DESIGN FLAW. THEY WILL NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUE. I HAVE SINCE SPOKEN TO AN AREA HARLEY DEALERS MECHANIC WHO ACKNOWLEDGED THE PROBLEM BUT STATED THAT HARLEY WON'T ADDRESS THE PROBLEM UNTIL MORE BIKES START REACHING THE 30,000 MILE MARK WHEN THIS FAILURE TYPICALLY OCCURS DUE TO METAL FATIGUE. I FEAR THAT THIS SITUATION COULD CAUSE THE REAR WHEEL TO FALL OFF WHILE THE BIKE IN OPERAT
2000 Harley-Davidson Flhtc
Routine
Owners filed 1 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the suspension › rear. No safety recall has been issued.
What fails
| Component | Reports | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension › Rear | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What owners reported
Newest filingsSuspension › Rear
Filed Mar 25, 200832,000 milesWI
1 of 1 complaints, reproduced as filed.
Across model years
Worst on record: 2009| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Fires | Deaths | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2012 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2011 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2010 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2009 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2008 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2007 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2005 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2003 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2002 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2001 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2000 — this page | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1999 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1998 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1997 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1996 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1995 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1994 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1993 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1992 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1990 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
Reading this record
No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.
Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.
Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.