2001 Toyota Previa

Routine

Owners filed 3 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the seat belts › front › retractor. No safety recall has been issued.

What fails
ComponentReportsCrashesFiresInjuries
Tires1
000
Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Foundation Components › Disc1
000
Seat Belts › Front › Retractor1
000

What owners reported

Newest filings
Tires
Filed Jun 19, 2003ME

THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE FRONT TIRES .WHILE ON WARRANTY VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TWICE TO THE DEALER, AND DEALE RRE[PLACED TIRES AND PART OF THE SUSPENSION., PREMATURE WORN TIRE. NOW VEHICLE IS OUT OF WARRANTY, AND PREMATURE WORN TIRES STILL OCCUR. *AK

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Foundation Components › Disc
Filed Nov 21, 2001CA

IN 4 MONTHS MY NEW CARS FRONT BRAKES WEARED OUT WITH 4500 MILES, WITH LOT OF FIGHTS WITH MY DEALERSHIP THEY FIXED IT FOR FREE AND I HAVE A COUSIN WHO HAS THE SAME CAR WITH SAME PROBLEM AND GLENDALE TOYOTA FIXED HIS FOR FREE TOO, GLENDALE TOYOTA TOLD MY COUSIN THAT THEY ARE GETTING LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH THIS CARS FRONT BRAKES GOING OUT TO SOON AND TOYOTA MOTOR CO. IS TRING TO KEEP IT QUIT SO YOU NHTSA DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT THIS PROBLEM.*AK

Seat Belts › Front › Retractor
Filed Aug 27, 2001NJ

THE PASSENGER SEATBELT IN THE MIDDLE SEAT RATCHETS TIGHT AND LOCKS FOR NO REASON AND WILL NOT RELEASE UNLESS THE BELT IS UNBUCKLED AND RETUNED TO THE RESTING POSITION. THIS HAS HAPPENED BOTH DURING HIGHWAY AND LOCAL DRIVING. THE MANUFACTURER HAS REPLACED THE BELT AND THE PROBLEM STILL OCCURS. THE VEHICLE WAS LOOKED AT BE THEIR FIELD REP. WHO COULD NOT REPLICATE THE PROBLEM AND TOLD ME THEY WOULD NOT REPLACE THE BELT AGAIN, AS THEY DEEMED IT FUNCTIONING. THE BELT LOCKED AGAIN ON MY CHILD AND I DROVE STRAIGHT TO THE DEALERSHIP TO SHOW THEM THE PROBLEM, WHICH THEY AGREED WAS A PROBLEM. THE MANUFACTURER IS SENDING ANOTHER TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE TO LOOK AT THE BELT, BUT WILL NOT REPLACE THE BELT UNTIL THEY CAN FIND THE PROBLEM. I WILL NO LONGER ALLOW MY CHILD TO SIT IN THE SEAT. TOYOTA'S OFFICE IN CALIFORNIA HAS BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE PROBLEM (CASE # 200108070617) BUT THEY HAVE NOT SENT FOR THE ORIGINAL DEFECTIVE BELT AS OF 8.27.01. IT REMAINS IN FAIRLAWN, NJ. THE REPRESENTATIVE ASKED ME WHAT I WOULD LIKE THEM TO DO. I WANT IS A RELIABLE SEATBELT THAT DOES NOT STRANGLE MY CHILD (WHO IS 9 YEARS OLD).*AK

3 of 3 complaints, reproduced as filed.

Across model years

Worst on record: 1991
YearComplaintsRecallsFiresDeathsAssessment
2001 — this page3000Routine
19981000Routine
19979100Routine
199611010Routine
199530000Routine
199419020Routine
199341060Routine
199235020Routine
199174270Routine

Compare every Previa year →

Reading this record

No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.

Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.