Page 5 of 5 · complaints 201–226 of 226

2009 Mercury Milan complaints

Owner reports filed with NHTSA about this vehicle, newest first and reproduced as filed. They are unverified accounts: one proves nothing, and a pattern across many is the thing worth reading. Back to the full 2009 record →

Engine
Filed Jun 20, 201542,000 milesPA

WHILE DRIVING OFTEN TIMES MY VEHICLE REDUCES SPEED DRASTICALLY, WHILE PRESSING ON THE GAS. THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS ESPECIALLY WHEN ON THE HIGHWAY BECAUSE OF THE SUDDEN REDUCTION IN SPEED. MOST OF MY DRIVING IS DONE ON THE HIGHWAY. IT TAKES A LONG TIME FOR THE VEHICLE TO PICK UP SPEED AGAIN. ALSO IT DOES THIS WHEN I AM STOPPED AT A RED LIGHT WHICH IS ALSO A CONCERN FOR ME WITH MY CHILD IN THE CAR. I TRIED TO GET THIS PROBLEM DIAGNOSED BUT IT DRIVES FINE WHILE AT THE MECHANIC SHOP. MY VEHICLE HAS BEEN DOING THIS SINCE MY PURCHASE WITH ONLY HAVING 42,000 AND SOME MILES ON IT. MY VEHICLE HAS ONLY ABOUT 60,000 AND STILL DOES THIS. THIS PROBLEM NEEDS TO BE FIXED.

Fuel System, Gasoline
Filed Dec 30, 201471,000 milesNJ

I STARTED MY CAR AND TWO IDIOT LIGHTS WENT ON . THE ENGINE LIGHT AND A WRENCH LIGHT. THE THROTTLE BODY PART WENT BAD. I HAD MY CAR TOWED TO THE CLOSEST MERCURY DEALERSHIP. WHICH IS WEISLER DEALERSHIP ON BRIDGE AVE, IN POINT PLEASANT, NJ THE WANT TO CHARGE ME $425 FOR THE PART REPLACEMENT AND $275 FOR LABOR. I WILL HAVE A $700 BILL FOR A PART THAT FORD HAS HAD MANY PROBLEMS WITH AND RECALLS ON. I WOULD LIKE SOMEONE TO LOOK INTO THIS AND PLEASE GET BACK TO ME. I WILL ALSO BE CONTACTING THE FORD HEADQUARTERS IN CA. MY NAME IS [XXX] . CELL NUMBER: [XXX]. THANK YOU FOR LOOKING INTO THIS SITUATION. I LOVE THE CAR BUT DO NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE AFTER READING ALL THE COMPLAINTS FROM FORD CUSTOMERS CONCERNING THE THROTTLE BODY PART PROBLEM. FORD FOLKS NEED TO LOOK INTO THIS PART. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR UPDATED 2/10/2016 *JS

Electrical System
Filed Dec 30, 201471,000 milesNJ

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN STARTING THE VEHICLE, THE CHECK ENGINE WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE THROTTLE BODY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 71,000.

Air Bags
Filed Nov 26, 2014130,000 milesPA

I WOULD LIKE THAT KNOW WHY OR IF MY AIR BAGS WERE DEFECTIVE. I WAS JUST IN AN ACCIDENT MONDAY 11/24/14 TRAVELING 30 MPH THAT CAUSED WITH SEVER FRONT AND SIDE DAMAGE TO MY CAR AND CAUSES IT TO BE TOTALED AND NOT 1 ON MY AIR BAGS WAS DEPLOYED. *TR

Equipment
Filed Aug 27, 2014CA

2009 MERCURY MILAN. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO INFORMATION THAT PERTAINS TO RECALL NOTICE. *SMD THE DEALER INFORMED THE CONSUMER, HER VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. *JB

Vehicle Speed Control
Filed Jul 21, 201478,000 milesPA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY DECELERATED UPON DEPRESSING THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. THE CONTACT HAD TO PUMP THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL REPEATEDLY IN ORDER FOR THE SPEED TO INCREASE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHO INDICATED THAT THE CIRCUIT BOARD MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE CONTACT WAS AWAITING A RESPONSE FROM THE DEALER WHO MENTIONED THAT APPROVAL WAS REQUIRED FROM THE MANUFACTURER. THE VEHICLE WAS TO BE REPAIRED BY THE DEALER. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 78,000.

Vehicle Speed Control
Filed Apr 24, 2014112,831 milesGA

NOVEMBER 2, 2011, 2009 MERCURY MILAN WAS IN DRIVEWAY AND WOULD NOT START, JUMPED VEHICLE AND IT STARTED BUT WOULD NOT ACCELERATE; VEHICLE HAD TO BE TOWED TO 101 HWY 41, EAST, COURTESY FORD LINCOLN MERCURY, ROME GA 30161-6698. THIS IS DEALERSHIP WHERE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED NEW. PARTS AFFECTED: THROTTLE BODY 500 AND BATTERY. REPAIR COST: $698.78 APRIL 19, 2014, 2009 MERCURY MILAN STOPPED AND WOULD NOT START WHILE MY WIFE WAS OUT SHOPPING. JUMPED VEHICLE AND IT STARTED BUT WOULD NOT ACCELERATE; AGAIN VEHICLE HAD TO BE TOWED TO 101 HWY 41, EAST, COURTESY FORD LINCOLN MERCURY, ROME GA 30161-6698. THIS IS DEALERSHIP WHERE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED NEW. PARTS AFFECTED: THROTTLE BODY 500 AND BATTERY. REPAIR COST: $988.60. *TR

Vehicle Speed Control
Filed Mar 31, 201415,000 milesCT

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE ACCELERATING FROM A STOP, THE VEHICLE SURGED FORWARD. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE HAD TO ABRUPTLY APPLY THE BRAKES BEFORE THE VEHICLE WOULD RESPOND. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION WHERE THEY STATED THAT THEY COULD NOT DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE ACCELERATION FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 15,000.

Structure › Body
Filed Feb 25, 201446,000 milesCT

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DRIVER'S SIDE FRONT INTERIOR DOOR HANDLE BECAME DETACHED FROM THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED ABOUT THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 46,000.

Structure › Body › Door
Filed Jan 17, 201433,836 milesCT

INTERIOR DOOR HANDLE WILL NOT OPEN VEHICLE ON DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO EXIT VEHICLE WITHOUT CRAWLING OVER CONSOLE AND EXITING FROM PASSENGER SEAT OR OPENING WINDOW TO ACCESS EXTERIOR DOOR HANDLE. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE. AS THE SAME THING HAPPENED TO MY HUSBAND'S FORD FUSION 2010 HYBRID (WHICH COST OVER $200 TO REPAIR AT THE DEALERSHIP), I BELIEVE THERE IS AN ISSUE WITH THE MANUFACTURE/DESIGN/INTEGRITY OF PARTS IN THESE VEHICLES. IN ADDITION, THERE ARE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ON THE INTERNET FORD/MERCURY FORUMS CITING THE SAME PROBLEM. *TR

Service Brakes
Filed Jan 6, 201442,000 milesNY

THE 1ST FAILURE WAS ,AFTER LEAVING A GAS STATION, MY BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR WITHOUT WARNING. I BARELY MISSED THE CAR IN FRONT.AFTER 4 MONTHS,THE SAME THING OCCURRED AFTER LEAVING A HIGHWAY AT A LIGHT. OK AGAIN FOR A FEW MONTHS,THERE WAS A 3RD INCIDENT, BUT I CAN T REMEMBER THE DETAILS.I HIT A SMALL POT HOLE AND THE ABS CAME ON. I LOST MY PEDAL AGAIN.WHEN I SHUT THE CAR OFF, THE SYSTEM RESET AND IT WAS FINE. NOW WHENEVER THE ABS IS USED, I LOSE MY PEDAL WITHOUT WARNING. IT NO LONGER RESETS. MY MECHANIC HAS TO BLEED THE SYSTEM TO GET MY PEDAL BACK. IM AFRAID TO DRIVE THE CAR IN BAD WEATHER. I HAVE HAD 6 OR 7 BRAKE FAILURES IN THE LAST 18 MONTHS. *TR

Vehicle Speed Control
Filed Sep 5, 201345,000 milesMA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH, THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY STALLED. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO A LOCAL MECHANIC, WHO STATED THAT THE THROTTLE BODY WAS DEFECTIVE. THE MECHANIC RE-CALIBRATED THE THROTTLE BODY BUT IT DID NOT REMEDY THE STALLING FAILURE. THE CONTACT DID NOT TAKE THE VEHICLE TO DEALER OR CALLED THE MANUFACTURER. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 45,000. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE.

Vehicle Speed ControlCrash1 injured
Filed Jun 4, 201318,000 milesWV

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE STARTED THE IGNITION AND THE VEHICLE INDEPENDENTLY SHIFTED INTO REVERSE. THE CONTACT CRASHED INTO A BOAT BUT WAS NOT INJURED. THE FAILURE RECURRED ON A SEPARATE OCCASION, CAUSING THE CONTACT TO CRASH INTO A PARKED SHERIFF'S VEHICLE. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED INJURIES TO THE HEAD AND FRACTURED TEETH. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 18,000. *TR

Structure › Body › Door
Filed May 8, 201360,000 milesFL

THE PASSENGER SIDE DOOR STOPPED LOCKING, NOW THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR STOPPED LOCKING THIS MORNING WHEN I BROUGHT IT TO THE MECHANIC. ALSO THE DOOR HANDLE INSIDE ON THE DRIVERS SIDE HAS NOW FAILED. *TR

Service Brakes
Filed Oct 18, 201287,000 milesGA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 45 MPH AND APPROACHING A TRAFFIC STOP. THE BRAKE WAS DEPRESSED WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD ERRONEOUSLY. THE VEHICLE CAME TO A STOP AFTER THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED REPEATEDLY. THE FAILURE RECURRED THREE TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT AUTO MECHANIC WHO WAS UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. THE BRAKE MALFUNCTION RECURRED. THE CONTACT PLANNED TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER FOR FURTHER DIAGNOSIS. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE DEFECT. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 87,000.

Structure › Body
Filed Jun 1, 201221,000 milesPA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE EXITING THE VEHICLE THE DRIVERS SIDE DOOR HANDLE CRACKED AND BECAME LOOSE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHO CONFIRMED THAT THE DOOR HANDLE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 21,000. ....UPDATED 06/18/12 *BF

Suspension › Front › Control Arm › Upper Arm
Filed Mar 20, 2012TX

2009 MERCURY MILAN. CONSUMER STATES FRONT SUSPENSION FAILURE *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE PROBLEM WAS THE UPPER SUSPENSION ARMS ON THE VEHICLE. RIGHT AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED, BOTH UPPER CONTROL ARMS HAD TO BE REPLACED, BEFORE ALIGNMENT PROBLEMS COULD BE ADDRESSED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR UNRELATED PROBLEMS. HOWEVER, THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THAT WINDSHIELD WIPERS, TRANSMISSION FLUID AND NEW TIRES WERE NEEDED. SHORTLY AFTER THE VISIT TO THE DEALER, THE CONSUMER PURCHASED NEW TIRES FROM ANOTHER DEALERSHIP. THE DEALER INSPECTED THE VEHICLE AND DISCOVERED THE LEFT FRONT UPPER SUSPENSION ARM WAS HANGING BY A LOOSE NUT AND SEVERAL THREADS ON THE UPPER ARM'S BOLT. THE CONSUMER NOTICED THERE WAS NO SAFETY DEVICE THAT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE RETAINING NUT FROM COMING LOOSE. *JB

Vehicle Speed ControlCrash
Filed Mar 14, 201212,000 milesIL

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH INTO A PARKING SPACE, THE BRAKE WAS ENGAGED WITH FORCE AND THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE OVER A CONCRETE PARKING BLOCK. THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO A SET OF BUSHES AS A RESULT. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED NO PERSONAL INJURY. THE VEHICLE WAS THEN TAKEN TO A COLLISION CENTER AND REPAIRED FOR THE BODY DAMAGES. THE SAME FAILURE OCCURRED THREE TIMES. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 12,000.

Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Filed Feb 21, 201245,000 milesOH

FILED A COMPLAINT ABOUT THE SAME ISSUE IN JULY OF 2010. IN JULY OF 2010, I REPLACED THE BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS. I TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALER TO CHECK THE CALIPERS AS THE REAR PADS ON THE PASSENGER SIDE WERE SEVERELY WORN AND THE PADS ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE WERE FINE. DEALER INDICATED THE CALIPERS WERE FINE, BUT HAD NO EXPLANATION FOR THE UNEVEN WEAR. I ALSO CONTACTED FORD DIRECTLY AND THEY DID NOT HAVE AN EXPLANATION AS TO WHY THE PADS WOULD WEAR SO UNEVENLY. BACK BRAKES BEGAN PULSATING AGAIN AT 44,000 (ONLY 20,000 ON PADS). I AGAIN REPLACED THE PADS AND ROTORS AS THE PASSENGER SIDE WAS COMPLETELY WORN AND DRIVER'S SIDE WAS LESS THAN WORN. DROVE 15 MILES AND BRAKES ON PASSENGER SIDE WERE SMOKING. TOWED CAR ON A FLATBED TO INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHO SAID PASSENGER SIDE CALIPER WASN'T WORKING.THE ROTOR WAS WARPED FROM THE HEAT, THE BRAND NEW PADS WERE SCORCHED AND THE MECHANIC ADVISED IT WAS A GOOD THING THE CAR WAS TOWED TO THE GARAGE AS IT WAS A GOOD CHANCE THE AREA WOULD HAVE CAUGHT FIRE. HE REPLACED THE CALIPERS ON BOTH SIDES, THE BRAKE PADS AND TURNED THE ROTOR ON THE PASSENGER SIDE. THE PADS AND ROTORS ONLY HAD 15 MILES ON THEM. THE VEHICLE IS ON IT'S 3RD (4TH IF YOU COUNT THE PADS WITH 15 MILES ON THEM) SET OF PADS AND ROTORS AND THE SECOND SET OF CALIPERS. THIS SHOULD NOT HAPPEN ON A CAR WITH 46,000 MILES. *TR

Service Brakes, HydraulicCrash
Filed Nov 3, 201112,000 milesMI

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 40 MPH AND DEPRESSING THE BRAKES BUT THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT RESPOND. THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE, CROSSED OVER THE HIGHWAY AND CRASHED INTO A POST. THE CONTACT DID NOT RECEIVE ANY INJURIES. THE POLICE WERE CONTACTED AND A REPORT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND PENDING AN INVESTIGATION. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT CONTACTED. THE FAILURE AND THE CURRENT MILEAGES WERE APPROXIMATELY 12,000.

Air BagsCrash1 injured
Filed Oct 13, 201158,000 milesMA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 30 MPH AND CRASHED HEAD-ON INTO A UTILITY POLE, BUT THE AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. THE CONTACT WAS INJURED AND A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DENIED ANY ASSISTANCE WITH REPAIRS TO THE DEFECT. THE VEHICLE WAS DESTROYED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 58,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.

Electrical SystemFire
Filed May 9, 201119,487 milesMI

2009 MERCURY MILAN CAUGHT ON FIRE WHILE TURNED OFF, THE FIRE ORIGINATED FROM THE UPPER PART OF THE ENGINE MELTING PLASTIC AND DRIPPING DOWN ON SOME FUEL LINES. I CONTACTED FORD MOTOR COMPANY ABOUT THIS AS THE CAR WAS STILL COVERED UNDER FULL WARRANTY. THEY WILL NOT EVEN INSPECT THE CAR AS I HAVE REQUESTED OR PAY FOR ANY DAMAGES TO MY PROPERTY OR EVEN REPLACE THE CAR THAT WAS A TOTAL LOSS. *TR

Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Filed Sep 16, 201021,000 milesOH

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 40 MPH SHE APPLIED THE BRAKES AND THE PEDAL BEGAN TO PULSATE. THE FAILURE BEGAN TO RECUR WHENEVER SHE APPLIED THE BRAKES. SHE EXAMINED THE VEHICLE AND NOTICED THAT THE BRAKE PADS WERE EXCESSIVELY AND UNEVENLY WORN. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO BE EXAMINED FOR THE CAUSE OF FAILURE AND WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 21,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 24,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.

Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Filed Feb 12, 201018,000 milesNJ

I OWN A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. I BROUGHT IT IN TO THE DEALER ON FEBRUARY 4 2010. THE COMPLAINT WAS THAT I WAS HEARING A NOISE UPON BRAKING IN FORWARD OR REVERSE. THE DEALERSHIP SAID THAT THEY FOUND THE NOISE. THE BRAKE PADS IN THE REAR BRAKE CALIPER WERE SLIDING BACK AND FORTH IN THE BRACKET. I WAS ADVISED THAT THIS SHOULD NOT BE HAPPENING BUT , IT IS OK TO TAKE THE VEHICLE AND DRIVE IT THIS WAY. I ASKED WHAT SHOULD BE DONE TO CORRECT THIS. THEY SAID THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW HOW TO FIX THIS PROBLEM AND HAD TO NOTIFY FORD TO FIND OUT. THIS HAS BEEN OVER A WEEK AGO. I HAVE CALLED THE DEALER BACK SEVERAL TIMES. THEY ASSURED ME THEY WOULD GET BACK TO ME BY THE END OF THE DAY. THAT STILL HAS NOT HAPPENED. I DO NOT FEEL SAFE DRIVING THIS VEHICLE. IT IS STILL UNDER WARRANTY. HOW SHOULD I MOVE FORWARD ON THIS MATTER. *TR

Electrical System › Instrument Cluster/Panel
Filed Nov 9, 20091,000 milesFL

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY MILAN. IN SUNNY WEATHER, HE EXPERIENCES DIFFICULTY SEEING THE DISPLAY ON THE INSTRUMENT CONTROL PANEL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP AND HE WAS ADVISED THAT THE ENTIRE INSTRUMENT CONTROL PANEL NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 1000.

Visibility
Filed Apr 21, 2009500 milesMI

THE ANGLE OF THE HEADREST ARE SO EXTREME THAT THERE IS ALWAYS TERRIBLE PRESSURE ON MY NECK. THE HEADREST IS ALSO SO LARGE THAT IT BLOCKS MY VIEW WHEN LOOKING OVER MY SHOULDER FOR TRAFFIC. I'M AFRAID THAT I WILL MISS A CAR BECAUSE IT IS BLOCKED OUT BY THE HEADREST. THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS! I'VE ALREADY HAD TO SWERVE UNEXPECTEDLY ON 2 OCCASIONS BECAUSE I COULDN'T SEE A VEHICLE. *TR

Reading these

NHTSA publishes every complaint as the owner wrote it and investigates only a fraction. Spelling, capitalisation and judgement are the filer’s own. What carries weight is repetition: the same component failing the same way across many filings, and whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Full record for the 2009 Mercury Milan → · Every Milan year → · How the figures are calculated →