THE DRIVER'S SIDE SEAT BELT WOULD NOT LATCH, LEAVING THE DRIVER WITHOUT PROPER PROTECTION WHILE DRIVING. THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER WERE NOTIFIED AND THEY INFORMED THE CONSUMER THAT THE SEAT BELTS WERE NOT COVERED UNDER A SEAT BELT RECALL. *AK OTHER OWNER'S AND SERVICE PERSONS SUGGESTED THAT THIS WAS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH THIS MAKE/MODEL. THE BUCKLES WOULD LOSE STRENGTH AND WOULD NOT REMAIN BUCKLED. (UNABLE TO FIND THE REPLACEMENT DUE TO DEMAND) *SC *JB
1992 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
Routine
Owners filed 1 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the seat belts › front › buckle assembly. No safety recall has been issued.
What fails
| Component | Reports | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Belts › Front › Buckle Assembly | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What owners reported
Newest filingsSeat Belts › Front › Buckle Assembly
Filed Dec 10, 2003NC
1 of 1 complaints, reproduced as filed.
Across model years
Worst on record: 2022Reading this record
No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.
Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.
Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.