DT: CONSUMER OWNS A 1993 CHEVROLET W/T HALF TON PICKUP TRUCK . THE SPARE TIRE FELL OFF WHILE PARKED IN A PARKING LOT. THE CONSUMER DETERMINED THIS HAPPENED BECAUSE THE CABLE THAT HOLDS THE SPARE TIRE IS RUSTED. THE CONSUMER WENT TO THE GM DEALER, AND THE DEALER SAID THERE WERE NO RECALLS AND NO REPLACEMENT WAS OFFERED. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED THE GM MANUFACTURER AND THEY OFFERED NO REMEDY AS WELL. THEY WOULD FORWARD THE INFORMATION TO THEIR ENGINEERING STAFF. THEY DID RECOMMEND REPLACING THE CABLE WITH A SAFER ONE; THEY HAVE NEW ONES OFFERED AT THE DEALER THAT ARE MADE OF STAINLESS STEEL. THE CONSUMER HAS NOT REPLACED THE CABLE AT THIS TIME BUT PLANS TO DO SO. THE CONSUMER HAS CONCERNS FOR OTHER VEHICLE OWNERS WHO MAY HAVE THIS SAME CABLE. *AK *MR THE CONSUMER HAS REPLACED THE SPARE TIRE CARRIER WITH A NEW STAINLESS STEEL GM REPLACEMENT. *NM
1993 Chevrolet Chevrolet Truck
Owners filed 13 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the seats › front assembly › recliner. No safety recall has been issued.
| Component | Reports | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown or Other | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tires › Tread/Belt | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Seats › Front Assembly › Recliner | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Visibility › Windshield Wiper/Washer › Motor | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Seats | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Seat Belts | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Fuel System, Gasoline › Fuel Injection System | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Equipment › Mechanical › Slide-in Camper | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Electrical System › Wiring › Front Underhood | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What owners reported
Newest filingsTHE FIRST INCIDENT WITH THE AIR CONDITIONING MADE THE POWER STEERING TO FAIL, THE SECOND INCIDENT IS THE MOTOR FOR THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS KEEPS WORKING ON AND OFF.
WHILE DRIVING LEFT REAR (BRIDGESTONE DUELER APT LT215/75R15) TIRE EXPERIENCED TIRE SEPARATION, DRIVER WAS UNABLE TO CONTROL THE VEHICLE AND OVERSTEERED TO THE LEFT LANE CAUSING VEHICLE TO ROTATE IN A COUNTER-CLOCKWISE DIRECTION,GOING ACROSS THE NORTH BOUND LANES, THEN DRIVING UP ON THE RAISED CONCRETE BARRIER AND THEN OVERTURNING BACK ON TO THE NORTH BOUND TRAVEL LANES AND THEN SLIDING TO A STOP, CONSUMER SUSTAIN INJURIES. *JB
CURRENTLY, THESE TIRES ARE NOT ON THE RECALL LIST, BUT THEY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND ADDED. ALL FOUR TIRES HAD BELT SEPARATION AT THE SAME TIME. (TIRESIZE: P255/70R15)( DOT NUMBER: TIRE SIZE: P255/70R15 )
SEAT BELT DOES NOT HOLD
THIS TINY, RUBBER RETURN FUEL LINE RUNS FROM ONE INJECTOR TO THE NEXT. WHEN IT BREAKS, IT LEAKS FUEL DIRECTLY ON TOP OF THE EXHAUST MANIFOLD. MAJOR FIRE HAZARD WITH NO PARTS AVAILABLE.
FIBERGLASS BED COVER SOLD BY LEONARD BUILDINGS AND TRUCK ACCESSORIES 4239 CAPITOL BLVD. RALEIGH, NC 27604. HEAVY (100+ LBS) COVER HELD ON BY TWO FLIMSY ALUMINUM HINGES. I FOUND THAT ONE HINGE HAD CRACKED COMPLETELY AND THE OTHER ONE PART WAY. HAD THE OTHER HINGE FAILED AND THE COVER BLOWN OFF OF THE VEHICLE, IT WOULD HAVE CAUSED EXTENSIVE DAMAGE AND/OR INJURY TO ANY VEHICLE/PERSON WHICH IT HIT. I BELIVE THAT LEONARD SHOULD BE MADE TO RECALL/REPAIR THESE COVERS OR AT LEAST NOTIFY OWNERS OF THE POTENTIAL DANGER.
LEFT DRIVERS SIDE SEAT GUIDE RAIL HAS BROKEN IN HALF, SEAT ADJUSTER ASSYM. FAILED A PART. *AK
THIS WAS A NHTSA CAMPAIGN #95V246000. THE DEALER I TOOK THE TRUCK TO FOR THE RECALL FIXED THE DRIVERS SEAT AT I BELIEVE 60000 MILES. I DON'T THINK THEY DID ANYTHING TO THE PASSENGER'S SEAT. SINCE THE DEALER'S REPAIR I HAVE HAD TO REPLACE THE BOLTS AGAIN ON THE DRIVERS SEAT, THE DEALER SAID GM WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DOING THE REPAIR A SECOND TIME. NOW AT 123,000 MILES THE PASSENGERS SEAT BOLTS HAVE FAILED. THE DEALER CLAIMS THAT THE REPAIR WAS PERFORMED BEFORE AND OFFERS NO RELIEF. REPAIRS HAVE BEEN DEFECTIVE OR SEAT WOULD NOT BE BROKEN AGAIN. THANK YOU FOR ANY HELP YOU MIGHT PROVIDE.
THE PAINT IS PEELING OF THE TRUCK. NO SAFETY DEFECT.
NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR THIS VEHICLE. *AK
PARTS WERE NOT AVAILIABLE AND HAD TO BE ORDERED.
SUDDEN ACCELERATION, CAUSING ACCIDENT. *SD
13 of 13 complaints, reproduced as filed.
Across model years
Worst on record: 1995| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Fires | Deaths | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Fatalities reported |
| 2002 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2001 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 2000 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1999 | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1998 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Fatalities reported |
| 1997 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1996 | 49 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1995 | 53 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1994 | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1993 — this page | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Routine |
| 1992 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Routine |
| 1991 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Fatalities reported |
| 1990 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Routine |
Reading this record
No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.
Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.
Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.