1998 Mercedes Benz C230

Routine

Owners filed 39 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the electrical system › 12v/24v/48v battery. No safety recall has been issued.

What fails
ComponentReportsCrashesFiresInjuries
Electrical System › 12v/24v/48v Battery4
003
Suspension › Front3
000
Suspension3
000
Fuel System, Other3
000
Visibility › Power Window Devices and Controls2
000
Suspension › Front › Springs › Coil Springs2
000
Engine and Engine Cooling2
000
Electrical System2
000
Visibility › Sun/Moon Roof Assembly1
000
Visibility › Rearview Mirrors/Devices › Exterior1
000

What owners reported

Newest filings
Suspension
Filed Sep 8, 2015201,000 milesIL

ON 09/06/2015 @ APPROX. 1:30 P.M., MY WIFE, SELF, AND GRANDCHILDREN WERE TRAVELING HOME FROM OUR GRANDSONS FIRST JFL FOOTBALL GAME FOR THE SEASON. AFTER INSPECTING THE SUSPENSION I NOTICED THAT THE COIL SPRING WAS FULLY EXPANDED AND ARCHED OUTWARD BADLY. FURTHER INSPECTION NOTICED THAT THE UPPER COIL SPRING CUP/MOUNT HAD RUSTED AWAY AND ALLOWED THE FRONT END TO DROP, FLATTENING THE SUSPENSION ALLOWING THE WEIGHT OF THE BODY TO REST UPON THE LOWER CONTROL ARM. I DID SOME RESEARCH TO FIND ANY INFORMATION THAT I COULD TO HELP ME UNDERSTAND WHAT JUST HAPPENED. MY SEARCH GATHERED ME ALL KINDS OF OWNERS WHO WERE ANGERED THAT THERE IS NOT A RECALL FOR SUCH A MAJOR PART THAT IS WELDED TO THE BODY AND RUSTS AWAY IN MAN Y INCIDENCES. MERCEDES BENZ WILL NOT WARRANTY THIS PROBLEM. MANY HAVE STATED THE POSSIBILITIES OF MANY ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE INJURED AND/OR HAVE KILLED THOUSANDS YET IF THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE WELDS OR RUSTED INSULATED WELDS, NO ONE WOULD THINK THAT THAT COULD HAVE BEEN THE CAUSE AND IT GOES UNATTENDED! I CALLED MY LOCAL MERCEDES BENZ DEALER AND THEY TELL ME THEY WILL NOT COVER THIS PROBLEM, BUT, THEY CAN TRANSFER ME TO THE PARTS DEPARTMENT SO I MAY BUY THE PARTS TO THEN TAKE TO A BODY SHOP TO PAY OUT OF POCKET TO HAVE THEM WELD NEW PARTS ON . MERCEDES BENZ DEALER SAID IT IS A COMMON PROBLEM AND HAVE SOLD MANY OF THESE REPAIR PARTS. A FORUM ON LINE STATES THAT THERE WAS LEGISLATION THAT THERE MUST BE A SECTION CUT OUT OF THE BODY AND A NEW REPLACEM

Visibility/Wiper
Filed Sep 16, 201418,562 milesFL

THE WASHER FLUID RESERVOIR LEAKS AND MUST BE REPLACED. MERCEDES-BENZ CHOSE TO CHARGE $282.98 FOR THIS REPLACEMENT FOR PARTS AND LABOR. THE PART SEEMS OBVIOUSLY DEFECTIVE. WHEN THE CAR IS MOVING, THIS DEFECT CAN PREVENT THE WINDSHIELD FROM BEING CLEARED, AND CAUSE ACCIDENTS AND DEATH. MERCEDES-BENZ CARS WITH THE DEFECTIVE PART NUMBER MUST BE RECALLED. *TR

Fuel/Propulsion System
Filed Aug 11, 2014150,000 milesNJ

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. WHILE DRIVING DOWNHILL AT AN UNKNOWN SPEED, THE VEHICLE STALLED AND THE INSTRUMENT PANEL ILLUMINATED. THE CONTACT ALSO DISCOVERED A FUEL LEAK AND HAD THE VEHICLE TOWED TO A LOCAL MECHANIC. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 150,000.

Suspension
Filed Jun 10, 2014148,000 milesMA

I WAS SITTING STOPPED IN TRAFFIC WITH THE ENGINE OFF, AND THE FRONT DRIVERS' SIDE OF MY VEHICLE JUST SPONTANEOUSLY DROPPED AS IF THAT PART OF THE VEHICLE HAD FALLEN INTO A SINK HOLE. I WAS WAITING FOR A DRAW BRIDGE TO COME DOWN AFTER A SAILBOAT PASSED, SO THE CAR WAS TURNED OFF. WHEN I GOT OUT OF THE VEHICLE TO INSPECT WHAT HAD HAPPENED, I COULD SEE THAT THE FRONT SPRING HAD SEPARATED FROM ITS TOP MOUNT IN WHAT I ASSUME WAS THE FRAME OF THE VEHICLE. WHEN I SEARCHED ON-LINE I FOUND THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME WITH VARIOUS MODELS OF MERCEDES BENZ. IF I HAD BEEN DRIVING AT HIGHWAY SPEED I AND ANYONE ELSE IN THE CAR COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN KILLED, NOT TO MENTION OTHER VEHICLES, SINCE THE VEHICLE STEERING IS ALSO COMPROMISED WITH THE WHEEL BOTTOMING-OUT ON THE INSIDE OF THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. THE CAR IS A '98, BUT WITH ONLY 148,000, THIS SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. CLEARLY IT'S A DESIGN FLAW. WHY DOES NHTSA LET MERCEDES BENZ GET AWAY WITH THIS WITHOUT DEMANDING A RECALL? WHEN YOU LOOK ON THE WEB, YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS IS HAPPENING TO MANY PEOPLE, AND NOT ONLY IS MERCEDES REFUSING TO FIX IT FOR FREE, DEALERS ARE CHARGING CUSTOMERS THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO FIX THE DESIGN FLAW. I JUST GOT A QUOTE OF $2,000 FROM ONE DEALER OVER THE PHONE TO FIX BOTH FRONT SPRING PERCHES, AND IT COULD BE MORE IF ANYTHING IS DAMAGED OTHER THAN THE PERCH ITSELF. HE SAID OTHER DEALERS ARE CHARGING $5,000 FOR THE REPAIR TO BOTH SIDES. WHAT COULD BE MORE DANGEROUS THAN HAVING YOUR FRONT-

Suspension
Filed Dec 26, 2012110,000 milesWI

I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD AND NOTICED THE FRONT END DROP AND THE CAR WAS NOT HANDLING RIGHT. I DROVE THE CAR TO THE REPAIR SHOP AND HAD ASKED THEM TO LOOK AT THE SHOCKS. THAT'S WHEN I WAS INFORMED THAT THE COIL SPRING MOUNT WAS CRACKED AND WAS SEPARATING FROM THE FRAME, I WAS ALSO INFORMED THE PASSENGER SIDE WAS NOT MUCH BETTER... THEY SAID IT WAS DUE TO A RUST ISSUE ALTHOUGH THE CAR WAS STORED WINTERS. VERY DISAPPOINTING.. I WILL ATTEMPT TO HAVE THIS REPAIR COST COVERED BY MERCEDES IF NOT AFTER READING THE OTHER COMPLAINTS, I WILL NEVER PURCHASE ANOTHER MERCEDES..NOR WILL I ALLOW ANYONE ELSE I KNOW MAKE THIS MISTAKE. *TR

Structure › Frame and MembersCrash
Filed Mar 17, 2011149,000 milesNE

MY LEFT FRONT SPRING PERCH RUSTED OFF THE FRAME AND MY FRONT WHEEL CAME OFF THE CAR AS I WAS DRIVING. THE RIGHT PERCH WAS RUSTED AND IT HAD TO BE REPAIRED ALSO. *TR

Structure › Body
Filed Nov 10, 2010150,000 milesNE

RIGHT AND LEFT SPRING PERCHES ARE RUSTING OUT AND COMING APART ON A 1998 230 C MERCEDES. PERCHES HAVE TO BE REWELDED SO FRONT WHEELS DON'T COME OFF THE CAR. *TR

Engine and Engine Cooling
Filed Oct 29, 2009122,748 milesCA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. THE VEHICLE WILL STALL WITHOUT ANY PRIOR WARNINGS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL REPAIR FACILITY, AND THE CRANK SHAFT POSITION SENSOR WAS REPLACED, THE REPAIR DID NOT REMEDY THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS THEN TAKEN TO THE DEALER, BUT THE TECHNICIANS COULD NOT IDENTIFY THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 121,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 122,748.

Engine and Engine Cooling
Filed Oct 29, 2009122,748 milesCA

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE WOULD STALL WITHOUT ANY WARNINGS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL REPAIR FACILITY, AND THE CRANK SHAFT POSITION SENSOR WAS REPLACED. THE REPAIR DID NOT REMEDY THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, BUT THE TECHNICIAN COULD NOT IDENTIFY THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. HE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 121,000 . THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 122,748.

Suspension › Front
Filed Sep 30, 2009149,000 milesMA

THE DRIVER'S SIDE UPPER COIL-SPRING MOUNT TORE AWAY FROM THE BODY STRUCTURE, EJECTING THE COIL SPRING AND BUSHING, COLLAPSING THE FRONT SUSPENSION AND RENDERING THE CAR IMMOBILE. THE CAR WAS PARKED AT THE TIME SO NO COLLISION. IF THE CAR WAS MOVING AT THE TIME OF THE FAILURE THERE WOULD BE NO WAY TO STEER IT. DUE TO ESTIMATED REPAIR COST OF $1500-2000 VERSUS RESALE VALUE, THE CAR WAS SOLD AS-IS AND TOWED AWAY. *TR

Tires
Filed Jun 3, 2009185,000 milesGA

ON 6/2/09, I REMOVED MY OLD WHEEL FROM MY 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230 PRIOR TO TRADING IT FOR ANOTHER VEHICLE. I POSTED THE CUSTOM WHEELS AND TIRES (YOKOHAMA YK520) THAT I PURCHASED FROM DISCOUNT TIRES. I MET WITH A GENTLEMAN WHO WAS INTERESTED IN PURCHASING THE TIRES, BUT CAREFULLY INSPECTED THEM AND FOUND HAIRLINE CRACKS ON THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE WALL OF ALL 4 TIRES. THIS WAS ENOUGH FOR HIM TO CHANGE HIS MIND AND NOT MAKE THE PURCHASE. I THEN BECAME SUSPICIOUS AND AFRAID THAT MY FAMILY LIFE COULD HAVE BEEN AT RISK AND MANY OTHER FAMILIES OUT ON ROADS ACROSS THIS COUNTRY AND ELSEWHERE. ON 6/3/09, I CONTACTED DISCOUNT TIRES AND BROUGHT THE COMPLETE WHEEL AND TIRES FOR AN INSPECTION AND POSSIBLY REPLACEMENT. DISCOUNT TIRES STATED THAT THE TIRES ARE A SAFETY HAZARD, BUT WOULD ONLY PRORATE THE TIRES AND GIVE ME A PARTIAL CREDIT TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF TIRES. DISCOUNT THEN GAVE A NUMBER TO CONTACT YOKOHOMA TIRES CONSUMER AFFAIRS OFFICE DIRECTLY TO DISCUSS THIS SERIOUS MATTER. I LATER CONTACTED YOKOHOMA CONSUMER AFFAIRS OFFICE AND DISCUSSED THE MATTER IN DETAIL WHICH THEY LATER REFUSED TO REPLACE MY TIRES OF GIVE FULL CREDIT REFUND. I EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT THIS MATTER WILL IMMEDIATELY BE FORWARD TO MY ATTORNEY FOR REVIEW IF THIS MATTER CANNOT BE RESOLVED AT THIS LEVEL. I AM VERY CONCERNED THAT THIS PARTICULAR YOKOHOMA TIRE (YK520) 225/40R/18 HAS A MANUFACTURER MATERIAL OR DESIGN DEFECT THAT CAN BE CATASTROPHIC TO MILLIONS OF FAMILIES OUT ON THE ROADS AS I WRITE THIS TODAY. I AM ALSO C

Suspension › Front
Filed Sep 4, 2008150,000 milesKY

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. WHILE DRIVING 10 MPH, THE UPPER SPRING PERCH (WHERE THE COIL SPRING CONNECTED TO THE BODY OF THE VEHICLE) COMPLETELY DISLODGED. THE ENTIRE DRIVER SIDE SUSPENSION COLLAPSED ON THE VEHICLE. HE WAS ABLE TO MANEUVER THE VEHICLE TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND IT WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE MECHANIC STATED THAT THE SUSPENSION FAILED DUE TO RUST. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE LESS THAN 150,000. UPDATED 11/25/08. *LJ UPDATED 11/25/08. *JB

Suspension › Front › Springs › Coil Springs
Filed Sep 4, 200858,000 milesMD

ON FRIDAY, AUGUST 8, 2008, WHILE DRIVING HOME FROM WORK THROUGH A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AT APPROXIMATELY 20-25 MPH. MY LEFT FRONT COIL SPRING FELL COMPLETELY OFF MY CAR! THE FRONT END DROPPED, I TEMPORARILY LOST CONTROL OF THE CAR, AND THE SPRING WENT INTO THE ROAD, CAUSING A ROAD HAZARD FOR ANY ON-COMING VEHICLE (THANKFULLY THERE WERE NONE). I WAS NOTIFIED BY THE MECHANIC AT MY GARAGE THAT THIS IS SOMEWHAT OF A COMMON OCCURRENCE WITH THIS VEHICLE (MERCEDES BENZ C230) AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO GET MERCEDES TO RECALL THE MOUNTING PIECE FOR THIS SPRING (WHICH RUSTED) FOR SOME TIME WITH NO SUCCESS. IS MERCEDES WAITING FOR A FATALITY BEFORE ACCEPTING THE SERIOUSNESS OF THIS DEFECT? NO DOUBT IF I HAD BEEN ON THE INTERSTATE TRAVELING AT 55-60 MPH I WOULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF THOSE FATALITIES (AS WELL AS OTHER MOTORISTS IN THE VICINITY). PLEASE POST THIS DEFECT AND TRY TO GET AS MANY MERCEDES OWNERS AS POSSIBLE ACQUAINTED WITH THIS DEFECT SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE THIS MOUNTING PIECE INSPECTED BEFORE DISASTER STRIKES! THIS PART SHOULD DEFINITELY BE RECALLED AND REPLACED IN ANY CAR IN WHICH IT IS INSTALLED. THE SPRING, MOUNT, AND BROKEN TIE ROD HAD TO BE REPLACED AT A COST OF $1,400. *TR

Suspension › Front
Filed Aug 12, 2008133,000 milesVA

WHILE DRIVING ON RTE 50 IN VIRGINIA, THE FRONT SPRING HOUSING COLLAPED AND THE COILED SPRING CAME OFF ONTO THE ROAD. THE DEALER SAID IT WAS CAUSED BY METAL FATIGUE OF THE BRACE THAT HOLDS THE SPRINGS ONTO THE FRAME. IT WAS A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION AS THE CAR HAD TO BE DRIVEN TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD IMMEDIATELY. THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME THAT THIS HAPPENED TO THE VEHICLE, THOUGH THE REPAIRER SAID THAT THIS HAS HAPPENED PREVIOUSLY ON MECREDES BENZES AND THAT THERE WAS A RECALL IN CANADA FOR THIS SAME DEFECT. THE CAR WAS REPAIRED - TWO NEW BRACES WERE WELDED TO THE FRAME AND SHOCKS WERE REPLACED THAT WERE DAMAGED DUE TO THE DEFECT.

Suspension › Front › Springs › Coil Springs
Filed Jul 25, 200768,000 milesMA

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1998 MERCEDES BENZ C230. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT SUSPENSION ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT SIDE COIL SPRINGS HAS FAILED. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE SERVICED AND THE TECHNICIAN CONFIRMED THE FAILURE. THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER HAVE NOT YET BEEN NOTIFIED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE COIL SPRINGS WERE REPLACED DUE TO THE SEVERE SAFETY CONCERN. HE HAS THE DEFECTIVE COIL SPRINGS FOR PROOF. THE COST OF THE REPAIRS WAS $434. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 68,000.

Electrical System
Filed Oct 30, 2005120,000 miles00

ONE MORNING CAR STARTED NORMAL BUT RPMS WERE HI WHILE IN PARK AND EVER SINCE THE CAR DROVE ROUGH, STALLING AT LIGHTS, DYING WHEN ACCELERATION WAS PRESSES. CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON - OBD READER CODE SAYS MASS FLOW AIR SENSOR FAILURE. REPLACED THE SENSOR, PROBLEM FIXED, AT A COST OF $500 FOR PART! *NM

Electrical System › 12v/24v/48v Battery1 injured
Filed Jan 19, 200570,000 milesPA

01 V 366 000/BATTERY: WHEN THE CONSUMER REMOVED THE BATTERY FROM THE TRUNK AND PLACED IT ON A CRATE TO CHECK THE WATER LEVEL, IT ALL OF A SUDDEN EXPLODED IN THE CONSUMERS FACE. THE CONSUMER SUSTAINED ACID BURNS, CUTS AND BRUISES TO HIS FACE. THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER WERE NOT NOTIFIED. *JB THE CONSUMER STATED THAT HE WAS NOT TOUCHING THE BATTERY AT THE TIME OF EXPLOSION. *TC

Electrical System
Filed Jul 15, 200456,000 milesNY

WHEN USING THE CIGARETTE LIGHTER, THE DASHBOARD BEGAN TO SMOKE WITHOUT WARNING. NO FIRE REPORTED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. *JB

Steering › Column
Filed Apr 12, 2004MD

WHILE TURNING ON THE TURN SIGNAL LIGHTS TURN SIGNAL LIGHTS WERE INOPERABLE. ALSO, WHILE DRIVING STEERING COLUMN HAD WIRES EXPOSED. CONSUMER DROVE THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION, AND MECHANIC REPLACED THE STEERING COLUMN SWITCH. CONSUMER INFORMED THE MECHANIC THAT THIS PROBLEM OCCURRED MORE THAN ONCE. *AK

Suspension › Front › Springs › Leaf Spring Assembly › Hanger,bracket
Filed Feb 9, 200479,000 milesIN

SPRING MOUNT BRACKETS, DRIVING CAR TURNED LEFT INTO LOT CAR FELT LIKE IT DROPPED A FOOT TOOK TO NEAREST AUTO PLACE, PEPBOYS THE SERVICE GUY TURNED THE WHEEL AND THE SPRING SHOT OUT OF THE CAR AMOST SEVERLEY INJURING HIM. MISSED HIM BY AN INCH. TOOK TO MERCEDES BODY SHOP FIXED IT BUT SAID THE OTHER WILL DO THE SAME THING. I ASKED THE SERVICE TEC. IF THIS HAS HAPPENED ON OTHER CARS. HIS REPLY SHOCKED ME WHEN HE SAID SEVERAL TIMES ON THE C280 NEVER HAS HAPPENED ON THE C230. IT HAPPENED!!!! HELP IF THIS HAS HAPPENED TO YOU IT WILL COST ABOUT 700.00 I COULD ONLY THINK IF I WAS ON A INTERSTATE OR WORSE. THANKS E

20 of 39 complaints, reproduced as filed.

Across model years

Worst on record: 2007
YearComplaintsRecallsFiresDeathsAssessment
2007212540Above average
2006116500Routine
200585460Routine
200431340Routine
200351330Routine
200254240Routine
20014010Routine
200029000Routine
199929010Routine
1998 — this page39000Routine
19977000Routine

Compare every C230 year →

Reading this record

No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.

Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.