1995 Lincoln Mark Viii complaints

IT IS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO CLEAR THE WINDSHIELD ON FOGGY AND ICEY DAYS, WITH THE ENGINE COMPLETELY WARMED UP AT ANY TIME. THE HEAT IS RAISED TO 90, THERE IS NO HEAT AVAILABLE, ALL OTHER TEMPERATURES ARE GOOD. THE DEALER INFORMED ME THAT THE BLEND DOOR ACTUATOR FAILS, OR THE LEVER BRAKES, DUE TO A STICKY BLEND DOOR. I FIND THIS PROBLEM TO BE A SAFETY ISSUE, ESPECIALLY IF IT OCCURES WHILE DRIVING. OTHER OWNERS HAVE STATED THAT IT HAPPENS OFTEN, EVEN AFTER REPAIR, AND THAT NEW COMPONENTS ALSO FAIL. DT

NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK

CONSUMER STATES HEADLAMPS ARE VERY DIM CAUSING POOR VISIBILITY DURING THE NIGHT HOURS. *TT THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE DEALER CHECKED THE VEHICLE BUT FOUND NOTHING WRONG. THEY DID INSTALL A NEW SET OF LENS'. *NM

MY COMPLAINT ON THESE HEADLIGHTS IS THE LACK OF GOOD LIGHTING. UNLIKE OTHER OWNERS, MY LIGHTS HAVE NOT YELLOWED NOR HAS ANY OF THE REFLECTIVE MATERIAL PEELED INSIDE THE HOUSING. THESE LIGHTS PLAIN SUCK. FORD/LINCOLN SAW FIT TO EQUIP THE LSC MODELS OF THE MARK VIII (1995-1996) WITH HID LIGHTING SYSTEMS, WHILE THE BASE MODEL MARK VIII FROM 1993-1996 USED STANDARD HALOGEN LIGHTING. THE HALOGEN LIGHTS ARE ABOUT AS EFFECTIVE AS A CANDEL IN A HURRICANE, AND IN MY OPINION AND THE OPINIONS OF OTHER OWNERS CREATES A VERY REAL HAZZARD FOR NIGHT TIME DRIVING. 1997-98 MARK VIII HAD HID LIGHTS ON ALL MODELS, AND THE HOUSINGS ARE A BIT LARGER, WHICH LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THAT THEY KNEW THE STANDARD HALOGEN LIGHTS WERE A BAD DESIGN FROM THE BEGINNING, AND WAITED 4 YEARS TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM. SYLVANIA, THE MANUFACTURER OF THE HEADLIGHT HOUSINGS IS JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME AS FORD/LINCOLN FOR THE FLAWS IN THESE UNITS. KNOWING THE HALOGEN UNITS ARE AS INNEFFECTIVE AS THEY ARE, THE HID LIGHTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN STANDAR EQUIPMENT ON ALL MODELS, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN A WARRANTY UPGRADE FOR ALL CARS NOT SO EQUIPPED FROM THE FACTORY INCLUDING THE 1993-94 MODELS AS WELL AS THE 1995-96 MODELS. THIS IS NOT FORD BASHING, I AM A FORD GUY ALL THE WAY, BUT THIS TYPE OF BAD DESIGN IS JUST WRONG, AND COULD LEAD TO SERIOUS INJURY. *AK

I AM WRITING AGAIN, IN HOPES THAT MAYBE SOMEONE IS LISTENING. THE COST IS QUITE PROHIBITIVE TO REPLACE A SIMPLE, AND SAFETY REQUIRED, THING AS HEADLAMPS, BUT THIS IS THE CASE WITH THESE CARS THE 1993 THROUGH 1996 MARK VIII IS THE ONLY CAR EVER OFFERED IN THE USA THAT USES THE HIGH WATTAGE 9005 BULB FOR LOW BEAM. THIS BULB IS NORMALLY USED IN FOUR LAMP SYSTEMS AS HIGH BEAM ONLY, WITH A 9004 OR 9007 OR OTHER BULB FOR LOW BEAM. HOWEVER, FORD AND/OR SYLVANIA'S CHOICE FOR THIS BULB, REQUIRED BECAUSE OF THE SMALL AREA OF LENS AND REFLECTOR, CAUSES THE REFLECTOR TO BE BURNT AWAY, AND A POSSIBILITY OF FIRE IS ACTUALLY QUITE GOOD, IN MY OPINION, GIVEN THE SEVERE BLACKENED SPOTS ABOVE THE BULB. FURTHER, I FIND IS QUITE INTERESTING THAT GIVEN THE SHEER NUMBER OF REPORTS ON THIS PROBLEM ALONE, THERE IS NOT A SHRED OF INFORMATION ON YOUR WEBSITE THAT ANY INVESTIGATION IS HAPPENING REGARDING THIS PROBLEM. SOMEONE LIKELY HAS TO GET KILLED BEFORE THIS BECOMES A MAJOR ENOUGH PROBLEM, IS THAT IT? SERIOUSLY, THESE CARS ARE DANGEROUS AT NIGHT, AND FORD AND SYLVANIA SHOULD BE MADE TO REPAIR ALL OF THEM THAT ARE STILL ROADWORTHY. SEE MORE INFORMATION AT HTTP://WEB.WT.NET/~HOUTEX/MARKLIGHTS.HTM. PLEASE BE SURE TO ALSO VISIT THE PAGE WITH THE PICTURE OF THE DAMAGED BEING DONE TO ALL MARKS AT HTTP://WEB.WT.NET/~HOUTEX/DAMAGED.HTM. I URGE YOU TO PROD JEFF TAYLOR, THE ORIGINAL CONTACT WE HAVE REGARDING THIS MATTER, AND/OR WHOMEVER ELSE IS INVOLVED TO PUSH THIS SERIOUS CONCERN OF SAFETY THROUGH SO THESE

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS CAR ARE DANGEROUSLY DIM FOR NIGHT DRIVING. ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS I HAVE CLOSE CALLS WITH CURBS AND ONE TIME WITH A PEDESTRIAN. I HAVE LOOKED INSIDE THE HEADLIGHTS WITH A FLASHLIGHT AND HAVE NOTICED WHAT LOOKS LIKE OVERHEATING FROM THE LIGHTBULB. THE REFLECTIVE MATERIAL AROUND THE BULB HAS EFFECTIVELY BEEN BURNT AWAY. I HAVE LOOKED AT SOME OF MY FRIEND'S1993-1996 MARK VIIIS AND ITS ALL THE SAME. I HOPE THAT SOMEONE AT FORD LISTENS ABOUT THIS. SOMEONE IS BOUND TO GET HURT OR KILLED BECAUSE OF THIS THE ONLY QUESTION IS WHEN. THANKS FOR YOUR HELP IN ADVANCE.*AK

THE DEALER PROMISED TO FIX UNACCEPTABLE INTENSITY OF HEADLIGHTS. THEY POLISHED LENSES AND ADDED NEW BULBS. THIS DID NOT CORRECT THE PROBLEM. I HAVE CHECKED WITH OTHER OWNERS ON MESSAGE BOARDS, WHO HAVE THE EXACT SAME COMPLAINT. THIS WAS A HIGH TICKET AUTOMOBILE AND I BELIEVE THE INNER REFLECTORS HAVE BURNED OUT OVER A SHORT TIME. IT IS A SAFETY HAZARD AS THE LIGHT DOES NOT DISPERSE. I AM ASKING ALONG WITH MANY OTHER OWNERS TO TRY AND PUT PRESSURE ON FORD TO RECALL ALL THESE SUBSTANDARD HEADLIGHTS FOR MARK V111 LINCOLNS AROUND 1994 TO 1996. THANKING YOU AND WILL AWAIT YOUR REPLY. *TS ***DIMSII IVOQ ENTRY POSTED AFTER 12-12-02 CUT OVER TO ARTEMIS***761512

I AM APPALLED BY THE UNSAFE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS VEHICLE! THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A DESIGN DEFECT - THE CHROME PLATED PLASTIC INSIDE THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY IS WORN AWAY, RESULTING IN SEVERELY DIM LIGHTING AT NIGHT. FORD HAS AN ALTERNATIVE FEASIBLE DESIGN, WHICH THEY CHOSE TO USE ON THE 1996 LINCOLN MARK VIII LSC MODEL (HID LIGHTING). THE COST TO UPGRADE TO THESE SAFER HID LIGHTS IS OVER $1500 AT A LINCOLN DEALER. I AM A STUDENT AND CANNOT AFFORD, AND SHOULD NOT BE EXPECTED TO PAY FOR, FORD'S DEFECTIVE DESIGN. PLEASE INVESTIGATE THIS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT SAFETY ISSUE, BEFORE AN OTHERWISE AVOIDABLE TRAGEDY OCCURS!

CONSUMER BELIEVES THE HEADLAMP ASSEMBLY UNIT CONTAINS A DEFECT, CONSUMER INSPECTED THE UNIT BECAUSE IT WAS NOT DISPLAYING THE PROPER LIGHT INTENSITY EVEN AFTER CHANGING THE HALOGEN BULB, THE INTERIOR REFLECTIVE SURFACE IS SHOWING BURN MARKS ON THE TOP PORTION OF THE UNIT AND THE REFLECTIVE COATING IS GONE, ALSO THE BURNING AND BLISTERING OF THE PLASTIC CAUSES MOISTURES TO ENTER THE UNIT AND THIS CAUSES THE LIGHT TO BECOME DIMMER AND DIMMER OVER TIME.*JB

LINCOLN MARK VII'S ARE NOTORIOUS FOR THEIR POOR, DIM HEADLIGHTS (93-96), WHICH ONLY SEEM TO GET DIMMER OVER TIME. I'VE FOUND THEM INADEQUATE EVER SINCE I BOUGHT THE CAR. NOW OWNERS ARE FINALLY SPREADING THE WORD TO GET FORD'S ATTENTION TO ADDRESS THIS DANGEROUS ISSUE.*AK

CONSUMER STATES THAT THE HEADLAMPS ARE VERY DIM, MANUFACTURER WILL NOT REPLACE, CONSUMER STATES HE CAN NOT SEE AT NIGHT. *SLC

ESPECIALLY SINCE THE SEARCH FOR "HEAD LIGHTS" BRINGS NO REPORTS FROM THIS SITE. IN REGARDS TO THE 1993-1996 LINCOLN MARK VIII HEADLAMPS, THEY ARE DESTINED TO FAIL EVERY TIME. THE REFLECTOR COATING INSIDE THE ASSEMBLY IS HEATED BY THE 65 WATT 9005 BULB TO THE POINT THAT THE COATING IS REMOVED FROM THE BACK OF THE REFLECTOR, AS WELL AS THE TOP OF THE REFLECTOR. THIS REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF LIGHT AT NIGHT, DUE TO THE FLAT WHITE PLASTIC THAT IS REVEALED. THE TOP OF THE REFLECTOR IS BROWNED AND BLACKENED FROM HEAT, FURTHER REDUCING THE LIGHT DUE TO ABSORBTION. ALSO, THE ASSEMBLY ITSELF IS DETERIORATING DUE TO THE HEAT, BUBBLING FROM THE INSIDE, AND IT IS BELIEVED BY SOME THAT THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ELECTRICAL FIRE. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE ON *ALL* 1993-1996 HALOGEN EQUIPPED MARK VIIIS. FORD DID MAKE A SOLUTION, BUT IT WAS ONLY AN OPTION FOR 1996 MY LINCOLN MARK VIII LSC MODELS. THEY WERE DIRECT REPLACEMENT, HID ASSEMBLIES, ELEMENTS, AND BALLASTS. IT MUST BE QUESTIONED AS TO WHY, AS AT THE TIME, THE HID SOLUTIONS WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY COSTLY, IN COMPARISON. MY WEBSITE, HTTP://WEB.WT.NET/~HOUTEX/MARKLIGHTS.HTM, HAS A VERY DETAILED EXPLAINATION AND DIAGRAM CONCERING THIS POTENTIAL DEADLY SAFETY DEFECT. PLEASE, I URGE YOU TO RESPOND QUICKLY. A MR. [XXX] FROM YOUR ORGANIZATION WAS SUPPOSED TO BE INVOLVED IN AN INVESTIGATION, BUT I'VE NOT HAD A RESPONSE FROM HIM REGARDING MY EMAILS AT [XXX]. IF HE IS NOT THE CORRECT CONTACT, OR I HAVE INCORRECT INFORMATION, PLEASE, WOULD YOU INFORM

HEADLIGHTS ARE POOR QUALITY AND WERE UPGRADED IN 1996-1997 MODELS. *AK

THIS IS TO REGISTER A COMPLAINT ABOUT THE INADEQUATE LIGHTING SYSTEM OF THE GENERATION 1 MARK VIII, MINE IS YEAR 1995. THIS HEADLIGHT SYSTEM IS TOTALLY INADEQUATE AT NIGHT TIME, AND FREQUENTLY REQUIRES I USE MY "HIGH BEAMS" TO SEE APPROPRIATELY, EVEN WITH LAMP POSTS ON AND SHINING. I'VE OFTEN FOUND MYSELF SWERVING TO AVOID BADLY MARKED CURBS ON THE LEFT SIDE, FOR EXAMPLE, BECAUSE BY THE TIME I SEE THESE CURBS, I'M ALMOST ON TOP OF THEM. THIS IS NOT AN INDICATION OF BAD DRIVING, IT'S JUST PLAIN BAD LIGHTS. FORD FIXES THIS PROBLEM WITH THEIR HID LAMPS IN THE 1996 LSC, WHICH ACCORDING TO MANY, IS A "DIRECT FIT" REPLACEMENT FOR THESE GEN 1 MARK VIIIS. I AM UNSURE HOW MANY OF THESE BAD LIGHT SYSTEMS ARE OUT ON THE ROAD, BUT I AM ABSOLUTELY SURE THAT WITH ENOUGH OF A SAFETLY CONCERN, THESE SHOULD BE FIXED. IT IS IMPERATIVE THIS BE ADDRESSED. I DO NOT FEEL THAT I PAID FOR A LUXURY CAR TO HAVE TO SPEND AN EXTRA 1000 OR MORE TO BE ABLE TO BE SAFE AT NIGHT. IF FORD HAD PROPERLY TESTED THEIR SYSTEM, IT WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE TODAY. REPLACEMENT LENSES ALONE WILL NOT WORK, AS THEY WILL FAIL TO PROVIDE LIGHT AS QUICKLY AS THE CURRENT ONES DID, NEGATING THE BENEFITS. BRIGHTER BULBS ALSO DO NOT WORK, EITHER DUE TO THE BAD LENSES, OR FAILURE OF THE SOCKETS AND HOUSINGS DUE TO THE HIGHER HEAT. AND IF *THAT* ISN'T A SAFTEY ISSUE (ELECTRICAL FIRE DUE TO HIGHER WATTAGE BY AN ATTEMPT TO FIX A KNOWN PROBLEM) I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS. FORD NEEDS TO FIX THIS ISSUE, BOTTOM LINE, FOR THE SAFTEY OF NOT ONLY

HEADLAMPS ARE DIM AND SEEM TO BE GETTING DIMMER AS THEY AGE. AFTER CHANGING THE BULBS IN THE LENS ASSEMBLIES AND NOTING THAT THE LIGHTS DID NOT IMPROVE, INSPECTION OF THE LENS UNIT REVEALED BURN MARKS AND PEELING OFF OF THE REFLECTIVE COATING INSIDE THE UNIT. IT IS SO BAD ON THE RIGHT SIDE THAT A CRACK HAS APPEARED AND MOISTURE IS ENTERING THE UNIT. MANY OWNERS WILL NOT THINK IT IS THEIR HEADLAMPS THAT ARE AT FAULT WHEN THEY HAVE DIFFICULTY SEEING AT NIGHT. I THOUGHT IT WAS MY EYESIGHT THAT WAS GOING BAD. I FEEL THIS IS A SAFETY HAZARD THAT SOULD BE CORRECTED BY THE MANUFACTURER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. I'VE SEEN SOME OTHER MARK 8'S WITH THIS SAME MOISTURE ON THE LENS SO I THINK THIS IS A VERY COMMON PROBLEM. WE NEED YOUR HELP. *AK

MAIN BEAMS ARE EXTREMELY DIM, AND HIGH BEAMS ARE ADEQUATE FOR NORMAL DRIVING, WHICH IS COMPLETELY WRONG, OF COURSE. FORD APPARENTLY HAS A "FIX" THAT WE CAN PURCHASE FOR ABOUT $900 IN PARTS, THEY ARE CALLED HID HEAD LAMP ASSEMBLIES. THIS PROBLEM IS VEHICLE DESIGN WIDE FOR GENERATION 1 MARK VIII YEARS 1993-1996. SOME LATE GEN 1 MARK VIIIS WERE LSC MODELS AND THEY CAME WITH THE HIDS. THERE IS A PROCEEDURE, AND MANY DOCUMENTS, REGARDING THIS ISSUE AT WWW.MARKVIII.ORG, THEIR FORUMS ARE LITTERED WITH THE ISSUE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. FIX THIS PROBLEM BEFORE PEOPLE CRASH BECAUSE THEY CANT SEE AT NIGHT AND DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*AK

MY COMPLAINT ON THESE HEADLIGHTS IS THE LACK OF GOOD LIGHTING. UNLIKE OTHER OWNERS, MY LIGHTS HAVE NOT YELLOWED NOR HAS ANY OF THE REFLECTIVE MATERIAL PEELED INSIDE THE HOUSING. THESE LIGHTS PLAIN SUCK. FORD/LINCOLN SAW FIT TO EQUIP THE LSC MODELS OF THE MARK VIII (1995-1996) WITH HID LIGHTING SYSTEMS, WHILE THE BASE MODEL MARK VIII FROM 1993-1996 USED STANDARD HALOGEN LIGHTING. THE HALOGEN LIGHTS ARE ABOUT AS EFFECTIVE AS A CANDEL IN A HURRICANE, AND IN MY OPINION AND THE OPINIONS OF OTHER OWNERS CREATES A VERY REAL HAZZARD FOR NIGHT TIME DRIVING. 1997-98 MARK VIII HAD HID LIGHTS ON ALL MODELS, AND THE HOUSINGS ARE A BIT LARGER, WHICH LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THAT THEY KNEW THE STANDARD HALOGEN LIGHTS WERE A BAD DESIGN FROM THE BEGINNING, AND WAITED 4 YEARS TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM. SYLVANIA, THE MANUFACTURER OF THE HEADLIGHT HOUSINGS IS JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME AS FORD/LINCOLN FOR THE FLAWS IN THESE UNITS. KNOWING THE HALOGEN UNITS ARE AS INNEFFECTIVE AS THEY ARE, THE HID LIGHTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN STANDAR EQUIPMENT ON ALL MODELS, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN A WARRANTY UPGRADE FOR ALL CARS NOT SO EQUIPPED FROM THE FACTORY INCLUDING THE 1993-94 MODELS AS WELL AS THE 1995-96 MODELS. THIS IS NOT FORD BASHING, I AM A FORD GUY ALL THE WAY, BUT THIS TYPE OF BAD DESIGN IS JUST WRONG, AND COULD LEAD TO SERIOUS INJURY.*AK

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS VEHICLES ARE VERY DIM. YEARS '1993-1995 THE LIGHTS ARE SO BAD AND IT IS A SAFETY ISSUE. YOU CANNOT SEE ANYTHING AND FORD KNOWS ABOUT THE PROBLEM AND WANTS $1600 TO FIX IT.*AK

I HATE THE POOR LIGHTING THESE HEADLIGHTS PROVIDE. MANT MARK VIII OWNERS RUN THE HIGH BEAMS ALL THE TIME WITH THE ADJUSTMENTS SET SO THEY DON'T AIM INTO UNCOMING DRIVERS EYES. I BELIEVE THE MANUFACTURER NEEDS TO RECTIFY THIS, AND THEY ALREADY HAVE THE "HID'' LIGHTS AVAILABLE AS THESE UNITS WERE INSTALLED ON MID-YEAR 1995S AND 1996S THAT WERE CALLED LSCS. HID LIGHTING ON THESE CARS IS GREAT!'*AK

ALL 1995 MARKVIII CARS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH THE HID HEADLIGHTS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN SOME OF THE LSC MODELS OF THESE CARS ARE A DANGER TO THE PUBLIC AND THE DRIVERS OF THESE CARS. THE LIGHTING IS INADEQUATE FOR SAFE NIGHT TIME DRIVING. THE LIGHTS ARE VERY DIM AND I HAVE HAD CLOSE CALLS BECAUSE OF THIS. I AM ALWAYS HAVING TO DRIVE THE CAR WITH THE HIGH BEAMS ON JUST SO I CAN SAFELY SEE THE ROAD. THE HIGH BEAMS BEING ON CAN CAUSE DANGEROUS CONDITIONS FOR ONCOMING VEHICLES SO I AM CONSTANTLY HAVING TO SWITCH FROM LOW TO HIGH BEAMS. THIS PROBLEM AFFECTS EVERY NON HID EQUIPPED MARKVIII VEHICLES AND I AM HOPING THAT SOMETHING CAN BE DONE TO CORRECT THIS. *AK

MAIN BEAMS ARE EXTREMELY DIM, AND HIGH BEAMS ARE ADEQUATE FOR NORMAL DRIVING, WHICH IS COMPLETELY WRONG, OF COURSE. FORD APPARENTLY HAS A "FIX" THAT WE CAN PURCHASE FOR ABOUT $900 IN PARTS, THEY ARE CALLED HID HEAD LAMP ASSEMBLIES. THIS PROBLEM IS VEHICLE DESIGN WIDE FOR GENERATION 1 MARK VIII YEARS 1993-1996. SOME LATE GEN 1 MARK VIIIS WERE LSC MODELS AND THEY CAME WITH THE HIDS. THERE IS A PROCEEDURE, AND MANY DOCUMENTS, REGARDING THIS ISSUE AT WWW.MARKVIII.ORG, THEIR FORUMS ARE LITTERED WITH THE ISSUE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. *AK

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS CAR DO NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH LIGHTING TO SAFELY DRIVE ON UNLIGHTED ROADS. EVEN THE HIGH BEAMS ARE INADEQUATE. MY 4 BATTERY FLASHLIGHT PUTS OUT MORE LIGHT THAN THESE HEADLIGHTS. WHEN COMPAIRED TO MY SECOND CAR THE HIGH BEAMS ON THE MARK VIII WEREN'T EVEN CLOSE TO THE LIGHTS IN NORMAL ON MY 97 TBIRD. WHEN I GET IN TO DARK AREAS I HAVE TO HOLD THE HIGH BEAM SWITCH PAST IT'S DETENT TO FORCE BOTH HIGH AND LOW BEAMS TO COME ON JUST TO SEE THE ROAD. I CURRENTLY DRIVE WITH THE HIGH BEAMS ON ALL THE TIME BECAUSE IT GIVES ALMOST THE SAME LIGHTING AS MOST CARS WITH LOW BEAMS ON. NO ONE HAS EVER BLINKED THEIR LIGHTS TO INFORM ME THEY ARE ON, MOSTLY BECAUSE THEY AREN'T BRIGHT ENOUGH TO BOTHER ANYONE. I HAVE DRIVEN THE NEW MARK VIIIS (96 LSC - 98) WITH THE UPDATED LIGHTING AND IT'S LIKE NIGHT AND DAY. THE FACTORY SHOULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING ABOUT THE OLDER CARS WHEN THEY UPDATED TO THE NEWER LIGHTS. THEY HAD TO KNOW SOMETHING WAS WRONG WITH THE OLDER OR THEY WOULDN'T HAVE IMPROVED THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE. THIS IS DEFENETLY A SAFTEY PROBLEM SINCE I HAVE ALMOST HIT AND GONE OFF THE ROAD SEVERAL TIMES NOW. I WON'T DRIVE THE CAR AT NIGHT UNLESS I HAVE TO BECAUSE OF THIS AND I REALLY LIKE THIS CAR.*AK

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS VEHICLE ARE EXTREMELY POOR. THEY ARE VERY DANGEROUS AS THEY DO NOT LIGHT UP THE ROAD THOROUGHLY ENOUGH, CAUSING ME TO CONSTANTLY DRIVE AROUND WITH THE HIGH BEAMS ON CREATING A DANGEROUS CONDITION FOR ONCOMING TRAFFIC. *AK

FACTORY HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMLY DIM AT NIGHT IN THEIR ABILITY TO PROJECT LIGHT IN FRONT OF VEHICLE AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. *AK

HEADLIGHTS ON THE 1993-1995 LINCOLN MARK VIII'S ARE INADEQUATE AND ARE DANGEROUS TO USE AT NIGHT, THE LIGHTS ARE SO BAD THAT THE HEADLIGHTS FROM THE CAR BEHIND ME MAKE A BIG BLACK SHADOW THAT I HAVE TO DRIVE THROUGH. I'VE ALMOST HIT DEBRIS IN THE ROAD MANY TIMES THAT I SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SEE IF THESE HEADLIGHTS EVEN MARGINALLY WORKED. LINCOLN ADDRESSED THIS ISSUE IN THE 1996 MODEL YEAR AND UPGRADED ALL THE MARKS TO HID LIGHTS... THESE SYSTEMS ARE READILY AVAILABLE AND SHOULD BE RETROFITTED INTO ALL 93-95 CARS....SAFETY SHOULD NOT BE A OPTION!!!!*AK

HEADLIGHTS ON THESE CARS, 1993 TO 1995 MARK VIII'S ARE VERY POOR. NIGHT DRIVING IS A HAZARD AS IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SEE OBJECTS IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD THAT ARE MORE THAN 50 FEET AWAY.*AK

THE ORIGINAL HEADLIGHTS ON THE FIRST GENERATION LINCOLN MARK VIII ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR NIGHT VISABILITY. THEY DO NOT ILLUMINATE THE ROAD AHEAD AND ARE NOT SUFFICAINT TO SEE ROAD OBSTACLES. THIS IS A KNOWN ISSUE WITH FIRST GENERATION MARK VIII'S AND THE HEADLIGHTS WERE UPDATED IN 1996 WITH AN HID XENON ASSEMBLY AND ALL TOGETHER AGAIN IN 1997 WITH A TOTAL REDESIGN. I CONSIDER THIS A VERY LARGE SAFTEY HAZARD AND SHOULD BE LOOKED INTO AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.*AK

HEADLIGHTS DO NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE LIGHT FOR DRIVING AT NIGHT. THE LACK OF APPROPRIATE LIGHT MAKES NIGHT DRIVING VERY HAZARDOUS.*AK

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS CAR ARE DANGEROUSLY HORRIBLE. THE REVERSE LIGHTS ARE BRIGHTER, SERIOUSLY! THE PROBLEM WAS CORRECTED IN 1996 WHEN FORD PUT THE HID SETUP ON THE LSC MARK VIII'S. THE REST OF THE GEN 1 OWNERS ARE LEFT WITH BIRTHDAY CANDLES AS HEADLIGHTS. I HAVE HAD MORE THAN MANY CLOSE CALLS AS A RESULT OF POOR NIGHT VISION WITH THESE SO CALLED LIGHTS. FORD SHOULD ADDRESS THIS ISSUE BEFORE IT BECOMES ANOTHER FIRESTONE DISASTER FOR THEM. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. *AK

FORD HAS KNOWN FROM DAY ONE THAT THESE HEADLIGHTS WERE NEVER EFFICIENT. THEY ARE VERY DULL & I HATE TO THINK WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN AS A RESULT TO THIS.*AK

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THESE VEHICLES ARE HORRIBLY UNDERPOWERED. AT ANY RATE OF SPEED OVER 40 MPH IT POSES A RISK AT NIGHT NOT ONLY TO MYSELF, BUT ALL THE OTHER THINGS I DO NOT SEE PROPERLY. TREES, ANIMALS, PEDESTRIANS, PARKED CARS. THESE LIGHTS DESPERATELY NEED TO BE STRENGTHENED TO AID IN NIGHT VISION.

THE LIGHTS TURN YELLOW AND GLAZE OVER AND YOU CAN HARDLY SEE ANY LIGHT FROM THEM AT NIGHT. I TEMPORARILY SANDED THEM TO GET THE YELLOW OFF, BUT SOON I WILL HAVE TO REPLACE THE WHOLE ASSEMBLY. THE CAR IS MARGINALLY SAFE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT AND IT SCARES ME TO DO SO. *AK

HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY WEAK, TO THE POINT OF BEING UNSAFE IN MANY DRIVING CONDITIONS. DRIVING IN THE RAIN AT NIGHT IS A SCARY EXPERIENCE TO SAY THE LEAST. THE BROCHURES FOR MY CAR PROMISED HID LIGHTING BUT IT DIDN'T MATERIALIZE FOR THE 1995 MODEL YEAR.*AK

THE HEADLIGHTS WORK LIKE THEY ARE MENT TO. BUT THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE FACTORY LIGHTS ARE SO DIM THAT IS EXTREMELY UNSAFE TO DRIVE IN DARK AREAS. I HAVE ALMOST RAN OFF THE ROAD MANY TIMES, HIT ANIMALS, AND OTHER OBJECTS. THIS COULD CAUSE SERIOUS INJOURY. THE HEADLIGHTS ARE EXTREMELY UNSAFE, THEY ARE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH. THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH ALL LINCOLN MARK VIII'S FROM 1993-1996. THEY ALL NEED TO HAVE A HEADLIGHT RECALL. PLEASE TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY, SOMBODY COULD BE SERIOUSLY HURT OR KILLED BECUASE OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE WHAT IS IN FRONT OF THEM. A RECALL IS NEEDED!! *AK

YOU CAN NOT SEE AT NIGHT WITH THE LOW BEAMS. ****DIMS 11 IVOQ ENTRY POSTED AFTER 12/12/02 CUT-OVER TO ARTEMIS******776798.*AK *JB

THE HEADLIGHTS HAVE VERY POOR OUTPUT, MAKING IT NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO DRIVE AT NIGHT. FORD REFUSES TO BUDGE ON THIS ISSUE AND WILL ACCEPT NOTHING SHORT OF $700 PER SIDE FOR REPLACEMENT. THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS AND UNFAIR SITUATION.*AK

THE REFLEVTIVE COATING HAS WORN OFF OF THE HEADLAMP ASSEMBLY MAKING DRIVING AT NIGHT VERY DANGEROUS, I WAS TOLD I WOULD HAVE TO REPLACE THE RIGHT AND LEFT HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY AT WELL OVER $200 EACH. THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. THE HEADLAMPS HARDLY LIGHT UP THE STREET SIGNS WHEN ON DIM SETTING - WHEN USING HIGH BEAM THE LIGHTING IS WHAT WOULD BE EXPECTED ON A LOW BEAM SETTING. *AK

CONSUMER IS CONCERNED WITH THE LIGHT OUTPUT OF THE HEADLAMPS, THE REFLECTIVE COATING ON THE REAR OF THE LAMP IS DISCOLORED AND FLAKING OFF THE LIGHT OUTPUT, CAUSING POOR VISIBILITY ESPECIALLY AT NIGHT. *TT JG

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS VEHICLE PRESENT A DANGEROUSLY SEVERE HANDICAP WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT, ESPECIALLY IN INCLEMENT WEATHER. THE LENSES HAVE SEVERELY DISCOLORED CREATING A TRANSLUCENT LENS THROUGH WHICH THE LIGHT HAS TO PASS. DISCUSSIONS WITH OTHER MARK VIII OWNERS HAS REVEALED THEIR DISATISFACTION WITH THE HEADLAMP ASSEMBLIES. FORD DEALERS ANSWER TO THE APPARENTLY WIDESPREAD PROBLEM IS AN OFFER TO SELL NEW SETS AT UPWARDS OF $800. I BELIEVE FORD HAS AN OBLIGATION IN THIS MATTER TO REPLACE OR OFFSET THE REPLACEMENT OF THE AFFECTED HEADLAMP ASSEMBLIES.*AK

NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK

THE PROBLEM HAS TO DO WITH MOISTURE BUILDUP ON THE INSIDE OF THE HEADLIGHTS. THIS HAS BECOME AN EXTREME HAZARD AND A SAFTEY ISSUE. CAR CANNOT BE DRIVEN AT NIGHT DUE THIS HAZARD. THE MOISTURE BUILDUP HAS BEEN AN ISSUE WITH THESE CARS AND FORD HAS REFUSED TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. NEW PARTS ARE VERY EXPENSIVE AND SHOULD BE RECALLED. THIS IS A SAFTEY HAZARD AND THE CAR CAN NOT BE DRIVEN AT NIGHT. THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED ASAP. THANK YOU. *AK, DOMINIQUE LAMA

DIM HEADLIGHTS (POOR LIGHTING). *AK

HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM ON ALL THESE VEHICLES EXCEPT FOR THOSE WITH THE OPTIONAL HEADLIGHT SYSTEM. THE POOR REFLECTOR DESIGN AND THE SHORT LIFETIME OF THE REFLECTIVE COATING MAKE IT AS IF THE VECHICLE HAS NO HEADLIGHTS. I DRIVE WITHE THE HIGHBEAMS ON ALL THE TIME AND THEY ARE STILL SO DIM THAT ONCOMING TRAFFIC DOESN'T NOTICE. EVEN WITH HIGH BEAM ILLUMINATION ON THE LUMEN LEVEL IS LOWER THAN THE AVEAGE LOW BEAM OF OTHER VECHICLES. APPARENTLY THE MANUFACTURER KNEW THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM AND MADE "OPTIONAL" EFFECTIVE LIGHTING AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE OF MY VECHICLE. I HAVE TALKED TO OTHERS WITH THE SAME VEHICLES AND THEY ALSO HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM. THE REPLACEMENT HEADLIGHTS ARE VERY EXPENSIVE AND STILL DO NOT CORRECT THE PROBLEM.*AK

HEADLIGHT OUTPUT ON 93-95 MARK VIII'S IS EXTREMELY WEAK TO THE POINT THAT DRIVER CANNOT TELL IF LOW BEAMS ARE ACTUALLY LIT. LIGHT OUTPUT IS LESS THAN THAT OF TURN SIGNAL LAMPS.*AK

LOW BEAM HEADLAMPS ARE INADEQUATE FOR SAFE NIGHT HIGHWAY DRIVING. *AK

THE CAR SEEMS TO LOSE GEAR WHILE GOING SLOWAT HIGHER RATES OF SPEED IT SEEMS TO SHIFT OKAY.IT APPEARS LIKE IT IS 3RD. GEAR THAT SEEMS TO SLIP. .REGARDING WINDSHIELD WIPERS THEY STAY UP WHEN YOU STOP THEM AS OPPOSE TO SETTLING DOWN UNDERNEATH THE HOOD. FINALLY THE DOOR AJAR SENSOR STAYS ON EVEN THOUGH BOTH DOORS ARE CLOSED,IF I PLAY WITH THE PASSENGER SEAT SOMETIMES THE SENSOR WILL STOP SHOWING DOOR AJAR SIGNAL.*AK

THE STOCK HEADLIGHTS ARE INADEQUATE AND UNSAFE. WE HIT A DEER. LINCOLN SHOULD REPLACE STOCK LIGHTS WITH THE HID VERSION. MY DAUGHTER AND I WERE ALMOST KILLED HITTING A DEER. THE STANDARD LIGHTS ARE SO BAD WE DIDN'T STAND A CHANCE.

THE HEADLIGHTS ON THIS VEHICLE PERFORM EXTREMELY POOR AND DUE TO BAD DESIGN, THE LIGHT OUTPUT BECOMES EXTREMELY LOW WITH TIME DUE TO MELTING OF THE REFLECTIVE HOUSING AND BAD WIRING. THIS MAKES THE VEHICLE DANGEROUS TO DRIVE ON THE FREEWAY AT NIGHT OR IN POOR WEATHER(RAIN). I HAVE NEARLY GOTTEN INTO SEVERAL ACCIDENTS ON THE FREEWAYS SINCE PURCHASING THIS CAR DUE TO THE LIGHTS NOT GIVING GOOD VISIBILITY. ALSO, FORD IS PRICE GAUGING CUSTOMERS FOR REPLACING THE HEADLIGHTS ON THESE VEHICLES(CHARGING UPWARDS OF $600 TO REPAIR THESE LIGHTS), ONLY TO HAVE THE LIGHTS BREAK IN A SHORT TIME PERIOD AGAIN. THERE ARE NUMEROUS ACCOUNTS OF THIS PROBLEM FROM OTHER LINCOLN MARK VIII OWNERS. THE STRUTS ON THIS VEHICLE ARE AIR INFLATED AND THEY BECOME EXTREMELY BOUNCY ON THE FREEWAY MAKING THE VEHICLE HARD TO CONTROL. THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS FOR AVERAGE DRIVERS. *AK

FACTORY HEADLIGHTS (NON HID) INSUFFICIENT FOR NIGHT USE. DOES NOT DISPERSE ENOUGH LIGHT ON THE ROAD SURFACE TO BE SAFE. HEADLIGHTS NEED TO BE AUGMENTED WITH EITHER FOGLIGHTS/DRIVING LIGHTS TO BE SUFFICIENT FOR DRIVING AT NIGHT, ESPECIALLY IN THE RAIN. HEADLIGHTS CREATE A SAFETY HAZARD AND SHOULD BE RECALLED.*AK

THE CURRENT HEADLIGHTS OF THE CAR DO NOT LIGHT THE ROAD ADEQUATELY AT NIGHT, ESPECIALLY IN THE RAIN! FORD HAS UPGRADED THE LIGHTS ON THE 96 VERSION AND UP TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. BUT DRIVING MY 95 LINCOLN MARKVIII AT NIGHT PROVES DIFFICULT AND DANGEROUS. YOU CAN HARDLY EVEN TELL THE LIGHTS ARE ON AT NIGHT AND IN THE RAIN THEY ARE USELESS. I HAVE THE VIN NUMBER IF YOU NEED ME TO SUPPLY IT, PLEASE CONTACT ME AND I WILL GLADLY GIVE IT TO YOU. I HAVE ALSO HEARD RUMORS OF FORD FIXING THIS PROBLEM ONCE IN A WHILE FOR CUSTOMERS SO THEY MUST KNOW IT IS A SERIOUS ISSUE! THANK YOU. *AK