2000 Kawasaki KLR650

Routine

Owners filed 8 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the engine and engine cooling › engine. No safety recall has been issued.

What fails
ComponentReportsCrashesFiresInjuries
Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine5
000
Steering › Linkages › Arm › Idler and Attachment1
000
Power Train › Manual Transmission1
000
Engine1
000

What owners reported

Newest filings
Engine
Filed Feb 3, 201416,067 milesME

THE TORSION SPRING ON MY KLR 650 FAILED. THIS IS A MAJOR PROBLEM AND HAPPENS TO ALOT OF KLR 650 OWNERS. LUCKY FOR ME IT DIDN'T CAUSE THE ENGINE TO SEIZE WHILE I WAS RIDING. *TR

Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine
Filed Mar 24, 20068,766 milesCA

I HAVE ONLY OWNED THIS 2000 KAWASAKI KLR650 FOR A FEW MONTHS NOW AND HAD 8766 MILES AT THE TIME! I HAD READ ON THE INTERNET THAT THE IDLER SHAFT LEVER(KAWASAKI PART NO. 13168-1436) AND SPRING(KAWASAKI PART NO. 92144-1860) PUT IN EVERY KLR650 SINCE 1996 WERE PRONE TO FAILURE. DUE TO POOR QUALITY STEEL AND POOR MANUFACTURING! WHICH CAN CAUSE THE TIMING CHAIN TO SEIZE, WHICH RESULTS IN THE ENGINE SEIZING, AND IF THIS WERE TO HAPPEN WHILE RIDING WOULD CAUSE THE REAR WHEEL TO SEIZE. WHICH WOULD CAUSE DAMAGE, INJURY, POSSIBLY AN ACCIDENT AND DEATH! SURE ENOUGH A FRIEND OF MINE WHO IS A MOTORCYCLE MECHANIC HELPED ME CHECK INTO THIS AND WE DID FIND THAT MY IDLER SHAFT LEVER WAS INDEED BROKEN, MY SPRING WAS MISSING AND MY TIMING CHAIN WAS BARELY HANGING ON!!! LIKE I SAID MINE ONLY HAD 8766 MILES BUT THE PART HAD FAILED WAY BEFORE THAT AND I HAVE READ ON THE INTERNET THAT THEY HAVE FAILED WITH LESS THAN 2000 MILES. I AM STILL IN THE PROCESS OF TRYING TO FIND THE SPRING AND OTHER PIECES OF THE IDLER SHAFT LEVER IN SIDE THE ENGINE! TO FIX THIS I REPLACED THE BROKEN IDLER SHAFT LEVER WITH A PROFESSIONALS MACHINED 1 PIECE OUT OF STAINLESS STEEL MADE BY WWW.EAGLE-M-E.COM AND REPLACED THE SPRING WITH A NEW ONE ALSO FROM WWW.EAGLE-M-E.COM. *JB

Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine
Filed Dec 17, 200420,000 milesAZ

THE CLASSIC KAWASAKI KLR 650 BALANCE SHAFT TENSIONER FAILURE. 2000 MODEL YEAR MOTORCYCLE MAINTAINED AS PER FACTORY RECOMMENDATIONS BROKE A BALANCE SHAFT SYSTEM. OCCURRED AT LOW SPEED SO IT WAS NOT DANGEROUS AS IF IT HAPPENED AT SPEED. THAT WAS THE FIRST FAILURE. RECENTLY I FOUND IT WAS CRACKED DURING SERVICE OF THE WATER PUMP. INSTALLED THE 3RD ADJUSTER AT THAT POINT. RECENTLY I FOUND AFTERMARKET PARTS TO PREVENT FUTURE FAILURES AS THIS IS ACTUALLY A VERY COMMON PROBLEM ON THESE MOTORCYCLES AS THE GET HIGH IN MILES. AT THIS POINT I HAVE HAD 2 FAILURES OF A PART THAT IS A VERY WELL KNOWN ABOUT. JUST LOOK AT "KNOWN ISSUES" HERE HTTP://WWW.BIGCEE.COM/KLR650FAQ.HTML#INTAKE. *JB

Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine
Filed Dec 29, 20037,251 milesTX

BROKEN DOOHICKEY INSIDE MOTOR. *AK

Steering › Linkages › Arm › Idler and Attachment
Filed Aug 14, 20037,900 milesNC

I OWN A 2000 KAWASAKI KLR 650 DUAL SPORT MOTORCYCLE WHICH I PURCHASED NEW. I HAVE KEPT UP WITH SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE AS REQUIRED. THE IDLER SHAFT LEVER AND IDLER SHAFT SPRING WERE BOTH BROKEN. THERE WERE 3 BROKEN ENGINE PARTS INSIDE THE CRANKCASE WHICH CAN CAUSE THE ENGINE TO LOCK UP. THE DEALERSHIP WAS MADE AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM.*AK

Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine
Filed Jun 27, 200340,000 milesCA

I OWN A 2000 KAWASAKI 650 KLR DUAL SPORT MOTORCYCLE (I AM THE ORIGINAL OWNER), I HAVE KEPT UP WITH SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE...THE SAME PART(S) FAILED TWICE WITHIN THE ENGINE, CAUSING METAL PART FRAGMENTS TO GET CIRCULATED WITHIN ENGINE CASING DAMAGING ENGINE PARTS , WHICH COULD HAVE LED TO DANGEROUS FAILURE OF MOTOR WHILE RIDING... THE PARTS THAT FAILED WERE THE IDLER SHAFT LEVER AND IDLER SHAFT SPRING FIRST INCIDENT OCCURRED NOVEMBER/2002 SECOND INCIDENT OCCURRED JUNE/2003. *JB

Power Train › Manual Transmission
Filed Jan 13, 200315,000 milesAZ

TRANSMISSION LOCKED UP WHILE GOING 50 MPH DOWN A GRAVEL ROAD. REAR WHEEL LOCKED UP CAUSING AN UNCONTROLLED SLIDE TO A STOP. JUST GOT OFF THE FREEWAY DOING 75 MPH

Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine
Filed Jan 10, 2003CA

THIS INVOLVES ENGINE PART #13168-1436 (LEVER, IDLER SHAFT) IN THE ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM OF THE ENGINE'S BALANCER TENSIONER SYSTEM. I HAVE REMOVED A FAILED LEVER, IDLER SHAFT FROM MY KLR650 ENGINE. I HAVE ALSO ASSISTED IN THE INSPECTION OF THIS PART IN OTHER KLR650 ENGINES AND HAVE FOUND OTHER INSTANCES OF FAILURE. IN MY EXPERIENCE, THIS COMPONENT HAS TWO MODES OF FAILURE: WELD SEPARATION, AND BREAKAGE OF THE TOROIDAL-SHAPED SECTION THAT MATES WITH #39115-1077 (SHAFT-IDLER). KAWASAKI CUSTOMER SERVICE HAS PLACED THE BLAME FOR THE FAILURE OF THIS COMPONENT ONTO THEIR CUSTOMERS FOR NOT HAVING PERFORMED THEIR ENGINE MAINTENANCE IN A TIMELY FASHION. ON THE CONTRARY, THE VERY ACT OF ADJUSTING THIS MECHANISM MAY PRECIPITATE COMPONENT FAILURE. THE PROPER ADJUSTMENT OF THIS MECHANISM INVOLVES THE LOOSENING AND RE-TIGHTENING OF ADJUSTER BOLT #92150-1394 (BOLT,6X16). THE LOOSENING OF THIS BOLT ANY FURTHER THAN 2 TURNS OR SO PERMITS THE LEVER, IDLER SHAFT TO PARTIALLY/COMPLETELY DISENGAGE SHAFT-IDLER AND SLIDE DOWNWARD AND OUT OF ALIGNMENT WITH THE MATING SURFACES OF SHAFT-IDLER. THE RE-TIGHTENING OF BOLT,6X16 CAUSES THE LEVER, IDLER SHAFT TO BECOME WEDGED OR BREAK IF THE RECOMMENDED TORQUE IS APPLIED TO THIS BOLT. FAILURE NOT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURE HAS ALSO BEEN OBSERVED. LEVER, IDLER SHAFT MATES ONTO SHAFT-IDLER WITH A VERY LOOSE FIT. THE NORMAL CRANKSHAFT SPEED VARIATIONS PRESENT IN A SINGLE CYLINDER ENGINE ARE LIKELY TO PROMOTE COUNTERBALANCER DRIVE CHAIN WHIP WHIC

8 of 8 complaints, reproduced as filed.

Across model years

Worst on record: 2008
YearComplaintsRecallsFiresDeathsAssessment
20241000Routine
202316000Routine
20221000Routine
20171000Routine
20096000Routine
2008116110Routine
20073001Fatalities reported
20061000Routine
20051000Routine
20036000Routine
200211000Routine
200119000Routine
2000 — this page8000Routine
19997000Routine
19986000Routine
19971000Routine
19951000Routine
19932000Routine

Compare every KLR650 year →

Reading this record

No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.

Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.