1996 Chevrolet Crew Cab

Routine

Owners filed 1 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the suspension › front › control arm › upper arm. No safety recall has been issued.

What fails
ComponentReportsCrashesFiresInjuries
Suspension › Front › Control Arm › Upper Arm1
000

What owners reported

Newest filings
Suspension › Front › Control Arm › Upper Arm
Filed Jun 27, 200566,000 milesID

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE ARM THAT HOLDS THE WHEEL ON THE VEHICLE BROKE OFF, IT RIPPED PART OF THE FRAME. THE SERVICE DEALER STATED IT WAS A DEFECT WITHIN THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER SAID THEY WOULD PROVIDE $500 TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF A NEW VEHICLE OR THEY WOULD PROVIDE THE WELDING OF THE WHEEL ARM WITHOUT WARRANTY. *AK THE UPPER CONTROL ARM BRACKETS WERE NOT WELDED WHEN MANUFACTURED. THE BRACKET AND THE TIRE PUSHED UP AGAINST THE ENGINE AND SHORTED THE WIRING HARNESS, BLEW FUSES AND THE PICKED UP WOULDN'T START. *SC *JB

1 of 1 complaints, reproduced as filed.

Reading this record

No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.

Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.