2001 Bounder Motorhome

Routine

Owners filed 7 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the tires › sidewall. No safety recall has been issued.

What fails
ComponentReportsCrashesFiresInjuries
Tires › Sidewall4
000
Suspension1
000
Structure1
000
Service Brakes, Hydraulic1
000

What owners reported

Newest filings
Structure
Filed Feb 25, 201128,000 milesCA

DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE DUAL PANE WINDOWS ARE FOGGING AND OBSTRUCTING VISION TO THE POINT I CAN NOT SEE REARVIEW MIRRORS. THIS WILL REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS. *TR

Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Filed Sep 6, 20083,789 milesCA

IN SEPTEMBER 2006 , DESPITE REPEATED DOWNSHIFTING ON HILLS, AS IS THE RECOMMENDED STANDARD DRIVING PRACTICE, I STILL EXPERIENCED A LACK OF BRAKING WHICH LED TO MECHANICAL FAILURE. THE ABS LIGHT CAME ON AND I EXPERIENCED A LACK OF BRAKING POWER WITH THE PEDAL HAVING TO BE COMPRESSED COMPLETELY TO THE FLOOR IN ORDER TO SLOW THE RV. THE ABS LIGHT REMAINED ON FOR THE DURATION OF MY SHORT TRIP. THE BRAKES FELT "MUSHY" AT THAT TIME. I TOOK THE RV TO A SERVICE CENTER WHO DIAGNOSED THAT THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SENSORS HAD "FRIED" AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. AT THE TIME OF THIS TRIP, THE RV HAD ONLY 3789 MILES ON IT. THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS ENGINEERING DEFECT ARE THAT WE WERE CHARGED $867.08 TO REPAIR THE REAR SENSOR SPEED SIGNAL AND THE ANTI LOCK BRAKE COMPUTER/SENSORS. THIS TRIP OCCURRED AFTER SERVICE BULLETIN 50401-C RELATED TO SAFETY CONCERNS ON BOSCH BRAKE CALIPERS HAD BEEN COMPLETED BY BEAUDRY RV SERVICE CENTER IN SAN MARCOS, CA. IT IS MY OPINION THAT THIS ENGINEERING DESIGN DEFECT COULD LEAD TO SERIOUS SAFETY CONCERNS INCLUDING FIRE, PROPERTY DAMAGE, INJURY OR DEATH TO THE OCCUPANTS OF THE RV AND THAT OWNERS OF THE SUSPECT VEHICLES SHOULD RECEIVE REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE MONEY THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN SPENT TO REPAIR THE PROBLEM AS WELL AS PAYMENT FOR FUTURE ENGINEERING UPGRADES TO PERMANENTLY RESOLVE THIS DEFECT AND THE ASSURANCE THAT THE MOTORHOME WILL BE RESTORED TO A SAFE AND MECHANICALLY SOUND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. *TR

Tires › Sidewall
Filed Jun 25, 200524,000 milesGA

TIRE BLOW OUT AT 60MPH ON I-75, GEORGIA @ EXIT 39 ALL TIRES CHECKED BEFORE LEAVING ON TRIP AND HAD 102PSI. TIRES HAD ALWAY HAD 102 PSI SINCE NEW. MOTORHOME RUNNING 4000LBS BELOW MAX WEIGHT. NO CORNER HEAVY. CORRECT TIRE SIZE IS: 255 R 80 22.5

Tires › Sidewall
Filed Nov 17, 200427,000 milesFL

I HAVE A 2001 BOUNDER DIESEL MOTORHOME WITH MICHELIN XRV 255/80R22.5 TIRES. WITHIN A SIX MONTH PERIOD FROM APRIL TO OCTOBER 2004, FOUR OF THE ORIGINAL SIX TIRES ON THE MOTORHOME HAD BLOWOUTS BETWEEN 27,000 AND 33,000 MILES. ALL FOUR BLOWOUTS WERE SIDEWALL FAILURES CHARACTERIZED BY A "ZIPPER-RIP" ON THE SIDE OF THE TIRE. ALL BLOWOUTS WERE ON REAR TIRES OCCURRING AT SPEEDS BETWEEN 55 AND 70 MPH. AIR PRESSURE IS CHECKED REGULARLY AT THE BEGINNING OF THE DAY. WEIGHT OF MOTORHOME IS WELL WITHIN TIRE SPECIFICATIONS (I HAD EACH CORNER OF THE MOTORHOME WEIGHED SEPARATELY). SINCE ALL TIRES HAD A SIMILAR TYPE OF BLOWOUT WITHIN A RELATIVELY SHORT PERIOD, I'M QUESTIONING THE SAFETY AND SUITABILITY OF THE MICHELIN XRV TIRES FOR MOTORHOME USAGE. DOT NUMBERS OF TIRES THAT HAD BLOWOUTS NOT RECORDER BUT DOT NUMBERS OF THE REMAINING TWO ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT TIRES ARE B6H6AK3X1700 AND B6H6AK3X2000.

Tires › Sidewall
Filed Oct 6, 200435,292 milesTX

WHILE DRIVING MY 2001 BOUNDER DIESEL THROUGH CRESTLINE, OH, I STOPPED AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT AND THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE'S SIDEWALL BLEW OUT. NO ADDITIONAL DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE MOTORHOME. I CALLED A ROADSIDE SERVICE COMPANY AND HAD THE TIRE REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE. THE STEEL IN THE SIDEWALL AT THE BLOWOUT SIGHT WAS RUSTED AWAY. THE TIRE WAS A MICHELIN 255/80R22.5 XRV, DOT B6H6 AK3X2300 WITH 35,292 MILES ON IT. AFTER ARRIVING HOME FROM THE TRIP, I CALLED MICHELIN TO INQUIRE ABOUT WARRANTY COVERAGE. THEY REFERRED ME TO ONE OF SEVERAL DEALERS IN THE AREA. UPON INSPECTION OF THE TIRE, I WAS TOLD MICHELIN WOULD NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE FAILURE, AND THIS IS A FAIRLY COMMON FAILURE FOR THIS TIRE. THE FAILURE WAS ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER UNDER INFLATION, OVER INFLATION OR OVERLOADING (TAKE YOUR CHOICE). THESE ARE NOT VALID ASSERTIONS AS THE TIRE PRESSURE HAS BEEN MAINTAINED WITHIN 5 POUNDS OF MICHELIN'S RECOMMENDED PRESSURES, NOR HAVE THEY BEEN OVERLOADED. I HAVE KEPT THE TIRE FOR INSPECTION BY ANYONE WHO IS INTERESTED. THIS TIRE IS ADVERTISED AS BEING DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR RV USEAGE. AFTER NOTICING THE INORDINATE NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS BOTH ON THREADS ON THE INTERNET AND ON YOUR SITE, IT IS OBVIOUS THEY UTTERLY FAILED IN ACCOUMPLISHING A SAFE DESIGN. THIS TIRE IS DANGEROUS AND SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE HIGHWAYS FOR EVERYONE'S SAFETY. MICHELINS DENIAL OF POSSIBLE DEFECT PROBLEMS HAS CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT WHETHER I SHOULD SUPPORT THEIR CORPORATION BY BUYING ANY OF THEIR PRODUCTS IN THE FUT

Tires › Sidewall
Filed Jan 5, 2004FL

ON 9/12/03 A RIGHT REAR MITCHELIN TIRE - 255/80R22.5XRV BLEW OUT WHILE TRAVELING. ON 01/04/04 A LEFT REAR MITCHELIN TIRE - 255/80R22.5XRV BLEW OUT WHILE TRAVELING IN THE VERY SAME FASHION. WE ARE TOLD THESE TIRES SHOULD NOT HAVE DONE THAT AND ARE DEFECTIVE. *AK

Suspension
Filed Sep 19, 2001IL

THE HEIGHT CONTROL VALVE WAS INOPERABLE DUE TO AIR LEAK. *YH

7 of 7 complaints, reproduced as filed.

Across model years

Worst on record: 1996
YearComplaintsRecallsFiresDeathsAssessment
2001 — this page7000Routine
20004000Routine
19995000Routine
19986000Routine
19976000Routine
19968010Routine
19955000Routine
19944000Routine

Compare every Motorhome year →

Reading this record

No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.

Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.