1999 Mercedes Benz ML430

Routine

Owners filed 44 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the power train › automatic transmission. No safety recall has been issued.

When it fails
020k40k60k90k120k200k
78,000 milesMedian miles at failure

31 complaints record an odometer reading. Failures cluster around 60,00075,000 miles.

What fails
ComponentReportsCrashesFiresInjuries
Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine › Gasoline › Belts and Associated Pulleys5
000
Power Train › Automatic Transmission4
000
Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine4
000
Steering3
000
Engine and Engine Cooling3
000
Unknown or Other2
000
Fuel System, Gasoline2
000
Engine and Engine Cooling › Exhaust System › Emission Control › Catalytic Convertor2
000
Electrical System › Ignition2
100
Visibility › Rearview Mirrors/Devices1
000

What owners reported

Newest filings
Electrical System
Filed Dec 31, 201365,000 milesTN

DECEMBER 11, 2013 I WAS DRIVING HOME FROM WORK MY BENZ QUIT ON ME IN THE ROAD WOULD NOT START BACK (MY HOME IS WITHIN 2 MILES OF MY WORK) THE DAY BEFORE IT HAD QUIT AS I WAS MAKING A TURN BUT RESTARTED A COUPLE OF DAYS PRIOR I HAD THE CAR WARMING AND IT SHUT OFF WHILE WARMING UP BUT RESTARTED. THERE WAS NO LIGHTS ON THE INSTRUMENT DASH PANEL LIT OR STAYING LIT. AFTER SOME INTERNET INVESTIGATING I ASSUME IT WAS THE CRANKSHAFT POSITION SENSOR AS IT HAD ALL THE SIGNS THAT OTHERS HAVE HAD I PURCHASED ONE FOR THE REPAIR SHOP TO INSTALL. THEY HAVE INSTALLED IT BUT BELIEVE THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE CRANKSHAFT SO I AM NOT CURRENTLY DRIVING IT. I AM AFRAID TO DRIVE IT WITH IT QUITTING WITHOUT ANY TYPE OF WARNING. MY BENZ HAS LESS THAN 65K I DON'T HAVE THE CURRENT MILEAGE WITH ME AT THIS TIME BUT IF IT IS NEEDED PLEASE LET ME KNOW. *TR

Engine
Filed Apr 24, 2013120,000 milesCA

AFTER EXITING THE FREEWAY I NOTICED A LOUD EXHAUST SOUND COMING FROM UNDERNEATH THE CAR. AFTER PULLING OVER IOOKED UNDERNEATH THE CAR ANT THE FRONT DRIVER'S SIDE CATALYTIC CONVERTER SPLIT IN HALF ALONG THE WELDS. *TR BASICALLY, THE EXHAUST IS VENTING DIRECTLY TO THE OPEN AIR WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THE EMISSION SYSTEM. THE LEFT SIDE EXHAUST NOT HOLDING TOGETHER CORRECTLY. I THEN FOUND THAT MY CAR HAS A MANUFACTURER DEFECT: MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC AND DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG SETTLEMENT (EPA) AFFECTED VEHICLES: THE FOLLOWING VEHICLES HAVE BEEN RECALLED TO INSPECT AND REPLACE, IF NECESSARY, THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER: 1999-2001 MERCEDES BENZ ML 320 (VIN RANGE A036519-A260405) 1999 -2001 MERCEDES BENZ ML 430 ( VIN RANGE A057639-A260575) THERE IS NO MILEAGE LIMIT OR TIME LIMIT FOR THIS REPAIR/REPLACEMENT. I AM AN OWNER OF THE AFFECTED VEHICLE BUT THE DEALER WILL NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. HOW DO I PROCEED TO GET THIS VIOLATION REPAIRED? CAN YOU PLEASE POINT ME IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION? THIS IS A HEALTH/SAFETY ISSUE. THANK YOU, SCOTT

Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Filed Nov 2, 201171,000 milesNJ

THE BRAKELINES RUSTED THROUGH CAUSING A COMPLETE LOSS OF FLUID AND THE ABILITY TO STOP THE CAR. *TR

Engine and Engine Cooling › Exhaust System › Emission Control › Catalytic Convertor
Filed Sep 22, 201098,000 milesCT

TL* THE OWNS A 1999 MERCEDES-BENZ ML 430. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 25 MPH THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER STARTING MAKING A NOISE AND LEAKING. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO A LOCAL MECHANIC AND THE MECHANIC NOTICE THE WELDING WAS CRACKING. THE MECHANIC PULLED UP A RECALL AND SUGGESTED THE CONTACT TAKE THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR THE RECALL REMEDY REPAIR AND THE DEALER STATED DUE TO THE VIN NUMBER, THE VEHICLE IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE DEALER SUGGESTED TO THE CONTACT THAT HE CALL MANUFACTURER. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND THEY INFORMED THE CONTACT THEIR IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO AND THE RECALL CAMPAIGN IS CLOSED. THE CONTACT STATED THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RECALL. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 98,000.

Engine and Engine Cooling › Exhaust System › Emission Control › Catalytic Convertor
Filed Jul 28, 2010131,700 milesCO

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCEDES BENZ ML430. WHILE DRIVING AT 25 MPH, THE CONTACT HEARD A LOUD, UNUSUAL POP. THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE SOUNDED SIMILAR TO A LOUD MOTORCYCLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE CONTACT WAS ADVISED THAT THE TWO FRONT CATALYTIC CONVERTERS WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. THERE WAS NOT A RECALL FOR THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 131,700 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 132,000.

Visibility › Rearview Mirrors/Devices
Filed Apr 9, 201057,000 milesFL

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS 1999 MERCEDES ML-430. THE CONTACT STATED THERE WAS OIL LEAKING FROM THE LED REAR VIEW MIRROR, FILTERING THROUGH THE MIRROR AND CAUSING VISIBILITY DIFFICULTIES. IN ADDITION, THE OIL WAS LEAKING INTO THE VEHICLE INTERIOR CORRODING THE STEERING WHEEL AND DASHBOARD. THE CONTACT FELT THE FAILURE WAS A SAFETY ISSUE BECAUSE IT WAS AFFECTING HER LINE OF SIGHT. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 57,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 57,000.

Fuel System, Gasoline
Filed Oct 3, 2009106,000 milesIL

THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON AND I TOOK IT TO THE MERCEDES DEALER. I WAS TOLD THAT MY FUEL TANK SENSOR IS BROKEN AND IT NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. MERCEDES DEALERS SELL THE FUEL TANK SENSOR WITH THE FUEL TANK AS ONE UNIT. THEREFORE THE COST OF REPLACEMENT IS ENORMOUS. IN ADDITION AFTER RESEARCHING THIS ISSUE. I HAVE FOUND THAT COMPLAINTS FOR THE ML MODELS AND THE FUEL TANK IS NUMEROUS AND WORTH NOTICING. THIS DEFECT HAS OCCURRED IN THE MAJORITY OF MERCEDES ML MODELS AND THE DEALER ACTUALLY HAS A HUGE INVENTORY OF FUEL TANKS IN ORDER TO PROFIT FROM THIS DEFECT. NOT ONLY IS IT DANGER BUT IT CAUSES A HEADACHE FOR CONSUMERS FOR FAIL THE EMISSIONS TEST BECAUSE OF THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT AND THE SHEER COST OF REPAIR. *TR

Power Train › Driveline › Driveshaft
Filed Apr 2, 200985,000 milesCA

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCEDES BENZ ML430. WHILE DRIVING IN REVERSE AND FORWARD AT 25 MPH, THE CONTACT HEARD A CLICKING SOUND UNDERNEATH THE CENTER OF THE VEHICLE. HE ASSUMED SOMETHING WAS LOOSE UNDER THE VEHICLE AND DROVE TO THE DEALER. THE DEALER NOTICED THAT THE FRONT DRIVESHAFT BEARING WAS LOOSE. AFTER REPAIRING THE SHAFT, THE DEALER DISCOVERED THAT THE TRANSFER CASE WAS ALSO CAUSING THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT FEELS THAT THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD REPAIR THE VEHICLE BECAUSE THE OWNER'S MANUAL DOES NOT STATE ANYTHING ABOUT REPAIRING THE TRANSFER CASE. THE VEHICLE IS CURRENTLY BEING REPAIRED. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 115,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 85,000. UPDATED 04/13/09.*JB THE CONSUMER HAD TO PAY$ 3850 FOR A NEW TRANSFER CASE. UPDATED 06/15/09.*JB

Steering
Filed Jan 6, 200993,000 milesIL

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCEDES BENZ ML430. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FOR NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 08V465000 (STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST:HOSE, PIPING, AND CONNECTIONS). THE DEALER STATED THAT THE POWER STEERING PUMP WAS PREVIOUSLY DAMAGED TO A LOSS OF POWER STEERING FLUID OVER TIME. THE POWER STEERING PUMP WOULD COST $1,050 TO REPAIR. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER DID NOT ASSIST. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 93,000.

Unknown or Other
Filed Dec 22, 2008139,212 milesIL

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCEDES BENZ ML430. AFTER HAVING THE VEHICLE REPAIRED ACCORDING TO NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 2003040005, THE FAILURE OCCURRED WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH ON THE HIGHWAY. THE CONTACT WAS UNABLE TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER BECAUSE IT WAS 60 MILES AWAY. AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC REPAIRED THE VEHICLE ACCORDING TO THE RECALL AGAIN. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO RECEIVE REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE REPAIRS, THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NEVER REPAIRED AT AN AUTHORIZED DEALER FOR THE REPAIRS. THE CONTACT HAS ALL THE DOCUMENTS STATING THAT THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED BY THE DEALER. THE RECALL NUMBER WAS INACCURATE AND THE EXACT FAILURE WAS UNKNOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 139,212.

Steering
Filed Dec 10, 2008186,000 milesFL

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 MERCEDES BENZ ML430. IMMEDIATELY AFTER STARTING THE VEHICLE, THE CONTACT NOTICED A LOUD NOISE COMING FROM THE HOOD WHILE DRIVING 5 MPH. THE STEERING COLUMN BECAME DIFFICULT TO TURN. APPROXIMATELY TEN MINUTES LATER, THE STEERING BEGAN WORKING AGAIN HOWEVER, HE STILL FELT RESISTANCE WHEN TURNING. IN ADDITION, THE NOISE PERSISTED. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 08V465000 (STEERING:HYDRAULIC POWER ASSIST:HOSE, PIPING, AND CONNECTIONS) AND WAS ADVISED TO WAIT FOR THE RECALL NOTICE. THE DEALER PERFORMED THE RECALL REPAIR AND STATED THAT THE HYDRAULIC PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. AFTER THE REPAIR, THE FAILURE PERSISTED. THE CONTACT HAS INVOICES TO SUPPORT HIS COMPLAINT. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 188,200 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 186,000.

Power Train › Automatic Transmission
Filed Nov 29, 2008PA

THE CAR STARTED FROM FREQUENTLY POWER CUT-OFF WHEN DRIVING, AFTER PULL OFF THE ROAD BY POLICE AND THE ENGINE COOL DOWN FOR ABOUT 45 MINUTES TO 1 HOUR, IT WOULD START AND RUN FOR ABOUT 3 TO 5 MILES AND STOPPED AGAIN. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER ABOUT TWO MONTHS AGO WAS FIXED FOR OVER $500.00 FOR CRANKSHAFT PULLEY POWER FAILURE. PRIOR TO THAT, I REPLACED WATER-PUMP COST ABOUT $700.00. ABOUT 3 WEEKS AGO, I WAS DIVING TO WORK WHICH IS ABOUT 9 MILES FROM MY HOUSE; I DROVE FOR ABOUT 6 MILES AND THE CAR JACKED-UP 3 TIMES ON THE HIGHWAY AND STOPPED, I WAS LUCKY NOT HAVING ACCIDENT WITH ANOTHER CAR. AFTER PULLED ASIDE FROM THE TRAFFIC BY POLICE, I CALLED TOW-TRUCK TO TAKE IT TO THE SAME DEALER (MERCEDES-BENZ OF FORT WASHINGTON 1401 DRESHER TOWN ROAD DRESHER, PA 19025, PHONE: 215-646-7700). THREE DAYS LATER, I CALLED THE DEALER WHEN I DID NOT HEAR FROM THEM, AND THEY TOLD ME THAT THE TRANSMISSION NEEDS REPLACEMENT, AND WILL COST ME $6,800.00. I BELIEVE THERE IS A DEFECT; WHILE THE CAR IS STILL WITH THE DEALER, I RECEIVED SAFETY RECALL LETTER #2003-040005 FROM ANOTHER BRANCH OF MERCEDES-BENZ FOR THIS SAME CAR. THE CAR IS STILL WITH THE DEALER THEY DO NOT WANT TO REPAIR IT AND I DO NOT HAVE $6,800.00 TO REPAIR IT. *TR

Electrical System › Wiring
Filed Feb 18, 2008200,000 milesWI

MY VEHICLE SOMETIMES WON'T START AGAIN AFTER IF HAS BEEN RUNNING AND SHUT OFF. FOR EXAMPLE IT FREQUENTLY HAPPENS AT THE GAS STATION. I CAN'T GET MY CAR STARTED AGAIN AFTER I FILL UP FOR SOMETIMES 45 MINUTES. *TR

Power Train › Automatic Transmission
Filed Jun 5, 2007100,000 milesMD

COMPLAINT WARRANTS AN INVESTIGATION ON THE SUDDEN ONSET OF 1999 ML 430 MERCEDES BENZ SUV FAILURE OF TRANSMISSION WITHOUT ANY PRIOR WARNING. THIS VEHICLE MAKE AND MODEL DID HAVE A RECALL ON THE ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING SPECIFIC TO THE HARMONIC PULLEY WHICH WAS REPLACED. UPON DRIVING VEHICLE TO WORK ON 6/1/07 THE CAR SUDDEN BEGAN TO STALL SEVERAL TIMES. I HAD THE CAR TOWED IMMEDIATELY TO THE DEALERSHIP TO FIND THE TRANSMISSION NEEDS TO BE REPLACED (NO PRIOR WARNING OR SYMPTOMS WERE PRESENT.) *TR

Latches/Locks/Linkages › Hood › Latch
Filed May 27, 2007GA

DRIVING MY 1999 ML430 MERCEDES BENZ ON I-85 IN HOGANSVILLE, GA AT A SPEED OF 80 MPH WHEN THE CAR'S HOOD OPENED UP AND SLAMMED AGAINST THE WINDSHIELD. WAS ABLE TO SAFELY PULL TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. UPON REVIEW OF WHAT HAPPENED I DISCOVERED THAT THE HOOD HAD COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM THE HOOD LATCH. THE LATCH WAS STILL FIRMLY CONNECTED TO THE CAR. CONSIDERABLE DAMAGE TO THE CAR WAS CAUSED BY THIS INCIDENT. *TR

Electrical System › IgnitionCrash
Filed Nov 29, 200466,000 milesNY

LN LATE AUGUST, THE "CHECK ENGINE" LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED ON THE DASHBOARD OF A 1999 MERCEDES BENZML430. CAR WAS DELIVERED TO THE DEALER TO REMEDY THIS PROBLEM. AFTER SEVERAL WEEKS AND TESTS, MERCEDES BENZ DECIDED TO REPLACE TRANSMISSION. OWNER INCURRED COST OF LABOR. IN NOVEMBER, DRIVER WAS PARKING CAR AND REMOVED KEY FROM IGNITION WHILE TRANSMISSION WAS IN DRIVE. KEY RELEASED IN ERROR CAUSING CAR TO ROLL INTO A RAVINE AND HIT A TREE. MERCEDES HAS DONE NOTHING TO CORRECT THE FAILURE OF THIS IMPORTANT SAFETY FEATURE. IN FACT, THEY STATE THAT THE KEYS(3)ARE WORN DOWN AND NO LONGER PROVIDE THE SAFETY BY LIMITING THE RELEASE OF THE KEY UNLESS THE CAR IS IN PARK MODE. CAR WAS DELIVERED TO MERCEDES BENZ FOR INVESTIGATION. AFTER A TWO WEEK INVESTIGATION, MERCEDES CLAIMS THE KEYS(3) WERE WORN OUT AND THAT IS WHY THIS IMPORTANT SAFETY FEATURE FAILED. MERCEDES IS TAKING NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTING THE PROBLEM OR FIXING THE CAR. THE RESULT OF THIS "DEFECT" COULD INVOLVE SEVERAL FATALITIES. IF A DRIVER CAN REMOVE THE KEY FROM THE IGNITION WHEN THE TRANSMISSION IS NOT IN PARK, THIS FEATURE CAN NOT BE CLAIMED AS SAFE. IF MERCEDES CLAIMS THIS IS A KEY ISSUE, THEN ADDITIONAL SAFETY FEATURES SHOULD BE IN PLACE TO ALERT THE CONSUMER TO THIS PROBLEM. WHILE SUBMITTING THIS COMPLAINT, IT WAS NECESSARY TO FILL IN THE FIELD OF "HEADLIGHT LENSES." WRITER WAS NOT GIVEN ANY OPTIONS AND SO INPUTTED THIS INFORMATION IN ORDER TO PROCEED. AS YOU CAN SEE THE HEADLIGHT LENS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE

Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine › Gasoline › Belts and Associated Pulleys
Filed Sep 24, 200482,663 milesGA

CRANKSHAFT HARMONIC BALANCER FAILURE! (1999 MERCEDES BENZ ML430)... MILEAGE: 82000 REF: NHTSA ACTION # 03058..HE PULLEY FAILURE JUST OCCURRED WHILE DRIVING DOWN I85 IN ATL. UPON HEARING A KNOCKING NOISE AND SMELLING WHAT SEEMED LIKE RUBBER BURNING, I IMMEDIATELY STOPPED THE ENGINE. IT TOOK NO TIME TO FIND THE SOURCE OF THE SMELL, IT WAS THE V-BELT (NO LONGER CENTERED ON ALL PULLEYS) RUBBING AGAINST THE ENGINE. BEING REASONABLY MECHANIC SAVVY, I KNEW THIS WAS A LITTLE MORE SERIOUS THAN JUST A WATER PUMP OUTAGE AND PROCEEDED CALLED A TOW TRUCK. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO MY LOCAL MB DEALERSHIP (MB OF S.ATL) AT A COST OF $52.00& APROX DROP TIME: 8:00 PM. THE FOLLOWING MORNING I CONTACTED THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT TO FURTHER EXPLAIN MY SITUATION AND WAS ADVISED THAT THIS IS A KNOWN AND VERY COMMON ISSUE WITH THE V6 AND V8 ENGINES OF WHICH MINE IS THE LATTER (113942). HAVING NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE MULTITUDE OF CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS AND LAW SUITES, I WAS FLOORED WHEN THE QUOTE OF APPROXIMATELY $3500.00 WAS DROPPED IN MY LAP. THE DEALER HAS AGREED TO COMP THE PARTS.. APROX COST: $1300.. THE LABOR (14.85 HRS TOTALED $1510.00) I GET TO EAT! LAW SUITE TO FOLLOW IN AN ATTEMPT TO RECOVER MY OUT OF POCKET COST! WHY IS THIS NOT A RECALL ITEM!!!!!*AK

Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine
Filed Sep 5, 200472,000 milesMO

I'M AN OWNER OF A 1999 MERCEDES BENZ ML430 WHICH IN MY BELIEF HAS A DEFECTIVE PART NAMED A HARMONIC BALANCER OR A CRANK SHAFT PULLEY. THE REASON IM FILING MY COMPLAINT IS BECAUSE I WAS TOLD BY A MERCEDES BENZ SERVICE REP(CHRIS) OF TRI-STAR MERCEDES BENZ IN THE ST LOUIS MO,AREA THAT HE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF A MALFUNCTION OR A DEFECTIVE PART CALLED THE HARMONIC BALANCER THE INQUIRY WAS MADE AS I BROUGHT MY VEHICLE TO THE SAID ESTABLISHMENT AFTER HAVING A PROBLEM WITH A LOUD NOISE LIKE GRINDING IN THE ENGINE DEPARTMENT THE BATTERY LIGHT CAME ON THE ENGINE STARTED TO DIE OUT THE POWER STEERING BEGAN TO FAIL JUST THINK IF MY WIFE HAD BEEN DRIVING THE CAR SHE COULD HAVE CAUSED SERIOUS DAMAGE TO OTHERS AND HERSELF BUT GOD.... ON WEDNESDAY AUG 1,04 I HAD THE CAR TOWED TO TRI-STAR MERCEDES BENZ ON THE FOLLOWING DAY I RECEIVED A CALL FROM SERVICE REP CHRIS AND I TOLD HIM WHAT HAPPENED, HE SAID HE WOULD HAVE HIS TECH'S LOOK AT IT HE CALLED BACK ON THE SAME DAY AND STATED WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS I ASKED HIM DOES THIS HAPPEN OFTEN TO THE ML HE STATED NO. I WAS THEN QUOTED A PRICE OF 1700 DOLLARS TO FIX THE PROBLEM IF THE OIL PANS WERE DAMAGED AND 1450 IF IT WAS NOT. AFTER RECEIVING MY CAR BACK I AM HAVING PROBLEMS OF SHAKING IN MY STEERING WHEEL LIKE THERE'S SOMETHING WRONG WITH MY TIRES BUT THERE IS NOT. I BELIEVE ITS GOT SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE COSTLY REPAIRS OF THE HARMONIC BALANCER. A COUPLE OF WEB SITES WERE FOUND WERE I DISCOVERED ACCORDING TO OTHER MB OWNERS WERE HAVING THE SAME PROBLE

Suspension › Front › Control Arm › Lower Ball Joint
Filed Jun 3, 20044,300 milesMI

DURING ROUTINE INSPECTION THE DEALERSHIPS MECHANIC INFORM THE CONSUMER THAT THEIR FRONT BALL JOINTS WERE WARPED. THE PROBLEM WAS NOT RESOLVED. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION. *NM

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Foundation Components › Disc › Pads
Filed May 19, 200451,000 milesMD

WHILE DRIVING AT 65 MPH BRAKE SYSTEM SEIZED. CONSUMER EXAMINED THE VEHICLE AND FOUND THAT THE BRAKE PADS MELTED. ALSO, ABS PUMP UNIT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED.*AK

20 of 44 complaints, reproduced as filed.

Across model years

Worst on record: 2000
YearComplaintsRecallsFiresDeathsAssessment
200144000Routine
200047020Routine
1999 — this page44000Routine
19901000Routine

Compare every ML430 year →

Reading this record

No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.

Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.