1996 Mercedes Benz 280

Routine

Owners filed 13 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the service brakes, hydraulic › foundation components. No safety recall has been issued.

What fails
ComponentReportsCrashesFiresInjuries
Visibility › Windshield Wiper/Washer1
000
Vehicle Speed Control1
000
Unknown or Other1
000
Tires1
000
Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Foundation Components1
000
Power Train › Automatic Transmission › Park/Neutral Start Interlock Switch1
100
Equipment › Appliance › Air Conditioner1
000
Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine › Gasoline › Belts and Associated Pulleys1
000
Electrical System › Wiring › Front Underhood1
000
Electrical System › Wiring1
000

What owners reported

Newest filings
Electrical System › Wiring
Filed Sep 19, 2007IL

EVER SINCE I BOUGHT THIS MERCEDES C280 1996 THREE YEARS AGO (2004) IT HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE WIRING HARNESS AND IT IS JUST TOO EXPENSIVE TO REPLACE IT. *JB

Electrical System › Wiring › Front Underhood
Filed Jul 1, 200790,000 milesNY

DURING A RECENT SERVICE OF MY VEHICLE AT AN AUTHORIZED MERCEDES BENZ SERVICE CENTER, I WAS INFORMED THAT THE INSULATION COVERING MY WIRES WERE DECOMPOSING AND THE WIRES WERE EXPOSED TO THE ENGINE, HENCE CREATING A SAFETY HAZARD FOR ME AND MY FAMILY. DUE TO THE SEVERITY OF THE PROBLEM, AND THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES IF THE WIRES CAUGHT ON FIRE. THE MECHANIC SAID IT WAS A MATERIAL DEFECT. HE REVEALED THAT THIS WAS NOT THE FIRST TIME HE HAD OBSERVED THIS PROBLEM WITH 1996 280C- CLASS. SINCE THIS APPEARED TO BE A HABITUAL DEFECT WITH THIS MAKE AND MODEL; I ASKED IF A RECALL HAD BEEN ISSUED TO REPLACE THIS DECOMPOSING WIRE HARNESS. HE REPLIED "NO." I DON'T THINK I SHOULD HAVE TO PAY TO HAVE THE HARNESS REPLACED. IT IS A DEFECT AND SHOULD BE PAID BY THE MANUFACTURER. I HAVE SEARCHED ONLINE AND FOUND MANY OTHER OWNERS, @ MERCEDESHOP.COM SITE, HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM WITH THEIR 280C CLASS. CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME? *TR

Vehicle Speed Control
Filed Mar 12, 1998CA

AFTER PARKING THE VEHICLE AND TURN OFF THE IGNITION, THE VEHICLE LURCHES FORWARD OR ROCKS BACKWARD, PROBLEM STILL EXIST.

Power Train › Automatic Transmission › Park/Neutral Start Interlock SwitchCrash
Filed Oct 28, 1997MO

ON SLIGHT INCLINE, AFTER GEAR SHIFT WAS PUT INTO PARK, KEY REMOVED AND SHUT DOOR WHILE WALKING TOWARD HOUSE, THE VEHICLE ROLLED BACKWARDS DOWN THE HILL, HITTING TWO TREES. PLEASE DESCRIBE DETAILS. *AK *NLM

Visibility › Windshield Wiper/Washer
Filed Oct 27, 1997CA

WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID SENSOR FAILED.

Electrical System
Filed Sep 18, 1997CA

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM HAS HAS NUMEROUS FAILURES SINCE OWNER PURCHASED VEHICLE.

Unknown or Other
Filed Jul 17, 1997CA

WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE ENGINE LIGHT COMES ON AND THE VEHICLE WILL START TO VIBRATE. CAUSE UNKNOWN. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. *AK

Air Bags › Frontal
Filed May 16, 1997HI

DRIVING VEHICLE; AIR BAG LIGHT KEEPS COMING ON. HAD THE SEAT BELTS AND AIR BAGS REPLACED; TOOK TO DEALER WHO HAD REPAIRED PROBLEM TEMPORARILY, BUT PROBLEM STILL EXISTS. *AK

Equipment › Appliance › Air Conditioner
Filed Apr 28, 1997CA

AIR CONDITIONER FAILED.

Tires
Filed Apr 10, 1997CA

MICHELIN TIRE FAILED. (SIZE P195/65R15)

Air BagsCrash1 injured
Filed Feb 28, 1997CA

NO DEPLOYMENT OF DRIVER'S SIDE AIR BAG IN ACCIDENT.

Engine and Engine Cooling › Engine › Gasoline › Belts and Associated Pulleys
Filed Feb 12, 1997CA

FAN BELT FAILED.

Service Brakes, Hydraulic › Foundation Components
Filed Mar 25, 1996TX

WHEN BRAKES ARE APPLIED, THEY MAKE A LOUD NOISE AND CAR CONTINUES TO MOVE. *AK

13 of 13 complaints, reproduced as filed.

Across model years

Worst on record: 1995
YearComplaintsRecallsFiresDeathsAssessment
20006000Routine
19993000Routine
19983000Routine
19975000Routine
1996 — this page13000Routine
199547040Routine
199418040Routine

Compare every 280 year →

Reading this record

No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.

Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.