1999 Chevrolet Tahoe complaints

DT*: THE CONSUMER STATED THE ABS ACTIVATED AT LOW SPEED AND THERE WAS AN INCREASED STOPPING DISTANCE. THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL, # 05V379000, REGARDING THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKES. THE CONSUMER EXPERIENCED THE SAME PROBLEM AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL; HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. *JB

THERE HAS BEEN A RECALL ISSUED FOR 2000-2002 TAHOE FOR FRONT WHEEL SPEED SENSOR CORROSION (PRODUCT SAFETY RECALL 05068) FROM GM. THIS SHOULD HAVE ALSO INCLUDED THE 1999 TAHOE. THIS ABS ISSUE IS CURRENTLY HAPPENING TO MY TAHOE. ITS BEEN OCCURRING SINCE THE MIDDLE OF 2005. I HEARD OF THE UPCOMING SAFETY RECALL BACK IN AUGUST 2005. BUT WHEN I TOOK MY 1999 TAHOE TO THE DEALERSHIP, THEY STATED MY VIN# WAS NOT ON THE LIST FOR RECALLS. WHEN I LOOKED DEEPER INTO THIS RECALL, IT ONLY INCLUDES 2000-2002 TAHOE. I KNOW OF THIS HAPPENING ON ANOTHER 1999 TAHOE SPORT. IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE GM EXPAND THE RECALL COVERAGE TO INCLUDE ALL 1999 TAHOE. *JB

ANTI-LOCK BRAKES ACTIVATE AT LOW SPEED AS NOTED IN CAMPAIGN ID 05V379000 OF NHTSA. I WAS TOLD MY VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL AND I AM WONDERING WHY IT ISN'T. *JB

CHEVROLET HAS RECALLED 1999 TAHOES FOR ABS SENSOR FAILURE DUE TO CORROSION. I DIDN'T RECEIVE A RECALL NOTICE, SO I CALLED CHEV. AT 1-800-630-2438. THEIR REPRESENTATIVE TOLD ME THAT MY VEHICLE'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DID NOT FALL WITHIN THE "BREAKPOINT", SO MY VEHICLE ISN'T COVERED IN THE RECALL, DESPITE THE FACT THAT I HAD TO HAVE THE ABS SENSORS REPLACED IN NOV, 2004 AT A COST OF $741. THE REP. COULDN'T EXPLAIN WHY MY VEHICLE DIDN'T FALL WITHIN THE SO-CALLED "BREAKPOINT". MY VEHICLE'S IDENT. # IS [XXX]. THE VEHICLE HAS ALWAYS BEEN USED IN MAINE, WHICH IS ONE OF THE "SALT BELT" STATES. *JB UPDATED 07/17/2012 *JS INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE ABS BRAKES PULSATED AT LOW SPEEDS, AND IT FELT AS IF THE VEHICLE WAS ON ICE. THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000 REGARDING THE ANTILOCK BRAKES. THE VEHICLE HAD THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL; HOWEVER, IT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR AN OIL CHANGE AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THIS WAS THE SAME PROBLEM AS IN THE RECALL. *AK UPDATED 2/7/2006 - *NM

DT*: THE CONTACT COMPLAINED ABOUT INCREASED STOPPING DISTANCE AND INAPPROPRIATE ACTIVATION OF THE ABS BRAKES AT LOW SPEEDS WHICH RESULTED IN THE VEHICLE STRIKING A GARAGE DOOR WITH MINOR DAMAGE TO THE VEHICLE. THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000 REGARDING THE ABS BRAKES. THE VEHICLE HAD THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL; HOWEVER IT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. THERE WERE NO INJURIES, AND POLICE REPORT WAS REQUIRED. THE DEALER REPAIRED THE VEHICLE AS INSTRUCTED IN THE RECALL. *AK UPDATED 01/25/06. *JB

DAD*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE HAS INCREASED STOPPING DISTANCE, AND THE ANTILOCK BRAKES ACTIVATED AT LOW SPEEDS. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN SEEN BY A DEALER. ANTILOCK BRAKES FAILED. THE VEHICLE HAS INCREASED STOPPING DISTANCE,ACTIVATED AT LOW SPEEDS. THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000, REGARDING THE ANTILOCK BRAKES. THE VEHICLE HAD THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL; HOWEVER, IT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. *AK

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING THE ABS ACTIVATED, CAUSING THE CONTACT' TO LOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT APPLIED PRESSURE TO THE BRAKES TWICE BEFORE THE VEHICLE STOPPED. AFTER THE FIRST INCIDENT THERE WAS EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCE AT LOW SPEEDS. THE DEALERSHIP DETERMINED THERE WAS CORROSION ON THE ABS SENSORS. THE ABS SENSORS WERE CLEANED IN DECEMBER OF 2004. THE ABS PROBLEM RECURRED, AND OUTDOOR TEMPERATURES DECREASED. *AK THE SERPENTINE BELT WAS REPLACED. UPDATED 01/19/06. *JB

INTAKE MANIFOLD COOLING SYSTEM LEAK. *JB

DT*: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL, CAMPAIGN 05V379000 REGARDING THE ANTILOCK BRAKES. THE VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL; HOWEVER IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. ON THIS VEHICLE THE ABS ENGAGED AT LOW SPEEDS OF 10 MPH OR LESS.*AK UPDATED 1/19/2006 - *NM

DT*: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN #05V379000 CONCERNING THE ANTILOCK BRAKES. THIS VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. *AK

INTERMITTENT INOPERATIVE WINDSHIELD WIPERS. SAME AS RECALL 98V150001. HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A YEAR. I NOW KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM IS. *JB

SMELLS OF ANTIFREEZE IN CAB. TOOK TO MECHANIC, INTAKE MANIFOLD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED. THIS IS DUE TO BAD PART INSTALLED. THIS IS A KNOWN PROBLEM WITH GMC. *JB

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN #05V379000 CONCERNING THE ANTI LOCK BRAKES. THIS VEHICLE HAD THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN AND THE MODEL YEAR. THE CONTACT REPAIRED THE VEHICLE AT HIS OWN EXPENSE.*AK

DT: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING THE DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR DEVELOPED A SHORT CIRCUIT IN THE ELECTRIC REARVIEW MIRROR SWITCH AND CAUGHT ON FIRE. HE WAS ABLE TO PUT THE FIRE OUT WITH THE WATER HOSE. THE MANUFACTURER SENT AN INSPECTOR TO ESTIMATE THE DAMAGE, AND THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED.*AK UPDATED 1/11/2006 - RECALL 03V093000 WAS INITIATED BUT IT ONLY COVERED THE 1997 AND 1998 MODELS. *NM

DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000 CONCERNING THE ANTI LOCK BRAKES. THIS VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL BEFORE IT WAS SOLD, BUT IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. THE CONTACT REPAIRED THE VEHICLE AT HIS OWN EXPENSE AND WANTED REIMBURSEMENT. *AK

FIRE IN DRIVERS SIDR DOOR AREA-DEFECTIVE CIRCUITS NOT FUSED. *NM

DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000 CONCERNING THE ANTI LOCK BRAKES. THIS VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO V AND MODEL YEAR.*AK

DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN #05V379000 CONCERNING ANTI LOCK BRAKES. THIS VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN AND THE MODEL OF THE VEHICLE. *AK UPDATED 01/04/06. *JB

THE RECALL THAT CHEVY HAS FOR THE ANTILOCK BRAKES ONLY GOES BACK TO 2000. MINE HAD THE SAME ISSUE AND I HAD TO REPLACE THE ENTIRE HUB ASSEMBLY ON EACH SIDE BECAUSE IT GOT SO BAD THAT THEY WERE ACTIVATING ALL THE TIME. I DO NOT HAVE THE PARTS, BUT I GOT IT REPAIRED AT A SERVICE GARAGE AND HAVE THE RECEIPT. *NM

DT: THE CONTACT COMPLAINED ABOUT AN ANTI LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM PROBLEM. THERE WAS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000. THE ANTI LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM ACTIVATED AT LOW SPEEDS, LESS THAN 5 MPH. THE DEALERSHIP AND THE MANUFACTURER HAVE BEEN CONTACTED. THEY TOLD THE CONTACT THAT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL, AND SINCE THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT REGULARLY SERVICED AT THE DEALERSHIP, THEY WILL NOT CONSIDER ASSISTING HIM. THE REPAIRS HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE VEHICLE AT CONTACT'S EXPENSE. *AK

I WAS IN AN ACCIDENT TODAY. THE REASON FOR THE ACCIDENT IS THAT MY ANTI-LOCK BRAKES ENGAGED AT LESS THAN 15 MPH THEREFORE NOT ALLOWING ME TO STOP IN TIME. THE BRAKE ACTUALLY FELT AS IF THEY WERE NOT WORKING AT ALL. I WAS INFORMED THAT NEWER MODELS WERE INCLUDED IN A RECALL IN THE SALT BELT, BUT NOT IN MN. WHAT CAN WE DO TO FIX THE PROBLEM? IT HAPPENED IN MN AND IN A 1999 TAHOE. THANKS, JOAN GODFREY. *NM

1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE - UNWANTED ANITLOCK BRAKE SYSTEM (ABS) ACTIVATION GM FAILURE TO RESOLVE/RECALL DEFECTIVE 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE. GM CAMPAIGN 05068 NHTSA 05V-379000 IN A LETTER DATED AUGUST 29, 2005 TO RONALD MEDFORD (NHTSA), GM REPORTS A PROBLEM WITH THE ABS SENSORS ON VEHICLES INCLUDING THE 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE. ON THE SAME DATE, NHTSA ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT AND CONFIRMS 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE TO BE PART OF THIS RECALL AND FOR RELEASE TO THE PUBLIC. ON AUGUST 30, 2005, GM NOTIFIES DEALERS OF UPCOMING SAFETY RECALL 05068 TO INCLUDE 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE. ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2005 GM SENDS PRODUCT SAFETY RECALL NOTES TO DEALERS OMITTING 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE AND OTHER MODELS AND STATES CUSTOMER NOTIFICATIONS TO BEGIN OCTOBER 14, 2005. ON OCTOBER 04, 2005 GM REVISES FORM 573 REMOVING 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE AND OTHERS. THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT NHTSA HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE REMOVAL OF THIS MODEL YEAR, NOR IF THIS WOULD STILL SATISFY PE05-020 / GM679 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THIS SAFETY RECALL AS ORIGINALLY IDENTIFIED BY GM AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY NHTSA. *NM

DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS A NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000 CONCERNING THE ANTI LOCK BRAKES. THIS VEHICLE HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN AND MODEL YEAR. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED DUE TO EXCESSIVE COST. *AK

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THE ABS BRAKES ACTIVATED AT LOW SPEEDS. THE MECHANIC SAID THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE ABS. REPAIRS HAVE NOT BEEN DONE AT THIS TIME. THE CONTACT FOUND NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000 CONCERNING ANTI LOCK BRAKES. HOWEVER, THIS RECALL COVERED ONLY THE 2000-2002 MODELS. WHEN SHE CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER, THEY SAID THIS VEHICLE'S YEAR WAS NOT INCLUDED. IN THE RECALL. *AK UPDATED 12/27/2005 - *NM

DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN ID 05V379000 CONCERNING ANTI LOCK BRAKES. THIS VEHICLE MANIFESTS THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. NO REPAIRS HAVE BEEN MADE AT THIS TIME.*AK

I HAVE A 1999 CHEVY TAHOE. THERE HAVE BEEN A FEW INSTANCES WHEN I HAVE APPLIED THE BRAKES AT LOW SPEEDS; THE BRAKES LOCK CAUSING THE TRUCK TO SKIP AND SKID. THIS IS TERRIFYING, AS I DO NOT KNOW WHEN THE TRUCK WILL STOP. SOMETIMES THE SKIP AND SKID WILL GO FOR 10-15 FEET BEFORE FINALLY STOPPING. TWICE I HAVE ALMOST HIT ANOTHER VEHICLE. A THIRD TIME I HAD TO DRIVE OFF THE ROAD TO AVOID A COLLISION BECAUSE THE TRUCK WOULD NOT STOP. THERE IS A CURRENT RECALL ISSUED BY NHTSA #05V379000 BUT DOES NOT EXTEND TO CALIFORNIA. I RESIDE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. THIS VEHICLE IS USED IN THE SNOW/SLEET/RAIN. THE CONDITION (SUMMARY OF RECALL) IS IN OCCURRING IN MY VEHICLE HERE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE RECALL. THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS OCCURRENCE WITH THE BRAKES THAT COULD RESULT IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT. *JB

DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000 CONCERNING THE ANTI LOCK BRAKES. THIS VEHICLE IS EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE MODEL YEAR OF VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE HAS BEEN PARTIALLY REPAIRED AT CONTACT'S EXPENSE. *AK

DT: THE CONTACT STATES THERE IS NHTSA RECALL 05V379000 CONCERNING THE SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC: ANTI LOCK. THIS VEHICLE IS EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEMS AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN. HE HAS NOT REPAIRED THE VEHICLE AT THIS TIME. *AK

DT: THE CONTACT STATED ABS BRAKES FAILED. HE APPLIED THE BRAKES WHILE PULLING INTO A PARKING LOT AND THE VEHICLE KEPT GOING. HE MANAGED TO AVOID THE VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SPACE IN FRONT OF HIM. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER , AND THEY REPLACED THE ABS SENSOR, WHICH RUSTED. THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATING NORMALLY NOW. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED. THEY OFFERED NO FREE REMEDY. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE NHTSA RECALL 05V379000 CONCERNING THE HYDRAULIC ANTILOCK BRAKES. *AK UPDATED 12/7/2005. *NM

IN REFERENCE TO THE CURRENT INVESTIGATION OF GM TRUCKS AND SUVS FOR BRAKE PROBLEMS AT LOW SPEED. AS I SLOW DOWN OR HAVE TO STOP ON CLEAR/DRY ROADWAYS, I HAVE BEEN FORTUNATE NOT TO SMASH INTO THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME OR TO CAUSE AN ACCIDENT BY GOING PAST THE STOP SIGN. I HAVE HAD THIS PROBLEM WITH MY 1999 CHEVY TAHOE SINCE DECEMBER, 2004 AND IT'S GETTING WORSE. IT USED TO HAPPEN JUST ONCE IN AWHILE, NOW IT HAPPENS 99% OF THE TIME WHEN I SLOW DOWN OR NEED TO STOP(AT A SPEED OF UNDER 10). I'M HAVING TO DOUBLE PUMP THE BRAKES AND STILL PRAY IT WILL STOP IN TIME. MOST REPAIR PLACES WANT TO REPLACE THE HUBS FOR A VERY HIGH PRICE OF $500 PER WHEEL OR MORE. I AM A MICHIGAN RESIDENT LIVING IN A "SALT BELT" STATE AND I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY THE 1999 YEAR CHEVY TAHOE ISN'T COVERED UNDER THE RECALL FOR REPAIRING THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKES. I WOULD LIKE TO CHALLENGE THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT TO DRIVE MY VEHICLE AND THEN DETERMINE IF IT SHOULDN'T BE COVERED. *NM

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THIS VEHICLE WAS HAVING THE SAME PROBLEM AS MENTIONED RECALL 05V379000, BUTT HIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. THIS OCCURRED FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR. THE BRAKES CONTINUALLY PULSATED WHETHER THE VEHICLE WAS MOVING OR PARKED. THE VEHICLE HAS BEEN TO THE DEALERSHIP TWICE FOR BRAKE FAILURE. THE LAST TIME THEY FOUND THAT BOTH ABS HUBS WERE BAD. DUE TO THE EXPENSE NO REPAIRS WERE PERFORMED. *AK UDATED 12/27/05. *JB

DT: THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS HAVING THE SAME PROBLEMS AS RECALL CAMPAIGN # 05V379000. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED GM BUT FOUND THAT HIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL DUE TO THE VIN NUMBER. THE PROBLEM STARTED APPROXIMATELY 18 MONTHS AGO. THERE HAD BEEN NO REPAIRS MADE AT THIS TIME. *AK (12/08/05) WHEN BRAKING AT LOW SPEEDS, THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKES WOULD ACTIVATE AND THE VEHICLE WOULD REQUIRE MORE DISTANCE TO STOP CAUSING SEVERAL NEAR MISSED ACCIDENTS. *SC

DT: THE CONSUMER STATED IN JANUARY 2004 WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES THEY ALMOST WENT TO THE FLOOR AND THEY MADE A RATTLING SOUND. ON 01-27-2005 HE HAD THE FRONT WHEEL SENSORS REPLACED BECAUSE THEY WERE DEFORMED DUE TO THE ACCUMULATION OF RUST ON THEM. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED GM AND THEY TOLD HIM THAT THERE WAS NO RECALL ON THIS VEHICLE. *AK (12/08/05) THE CONSUMER REQUESTED REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE REPAIR. THE VEHICLE ALSO EXPERIENCED NEAR MISSES DUE TO THE BRAKES GOING ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR BECAUSE OF CORROSION UNDER THE WHEEL SENSORS. *SC UPDATED 11/29/2005. THE CONSUMER REQUESTS REIMBURSEMENT BECAUSE THE VEHICLE HAS SUCH LOW MILEAGE. *NM

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE EXPERIENCES EXTENDED STOPPING DISTANCES. THE PROBLEM WAS INTERMITTENT AT FIRST AND HAS CONTINUALLY GOTTEN WORSE. SHE REPLACED THE ENTIRE BRAKING SYSTEM , TRYING TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM, AND DISCOVERED A RECALL RECALL 05V379000 FOR A DIFFERENT YEAR. THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED THE ABS SENSORS DUE TO CORROSION. *AK 11/29/2005 - *NM

DT: THE CONTACT COMPLAINED ABOUT ABS PROBLEM. NHTSA RECALL 05V379000 CONCERNING ABS BRAKES WAS ISSUED. THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE EXPERIENCED THE SAME PROBLEM AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL HOWEVER, THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED. IN THE RECALL DUE TO VIN. NO REPAIRS HAVE BEEN MADE AT THIS TIME. *AK

I HAVE 1999 CHEV TAHOE THAT APPEARS TO BE COVERED BY NHTSA CAMPAIGN # 05V-379. I SPOKE TO CHEVY CUSTOMER SERVICE AND WAS TOLD THAT EVEN THOUGH I WAS EXPERIENCING ABS BRAKING PROBLEMS, MY CAR WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE VIN IS [XXX]. *JB UPDATED 07/18/2012 *JS INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

DT: THE CONTACT STATED WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES THE ABS WILL ACTIVATE AT SPEEDS HIGHER THAN 3 MPH, BUT LESS THAN 10 MPH. THERE WAS PULSATION IN THE BRAKE PEDAL WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED. THERE WERE NO WARNING LIGHTS INDICATING A PROBLEM WITH THE ABS. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN INSPECTED TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM. HE BELIEVED IT WAS THE SAME PROBLEM AS INDICATED IN THE RECALL FOR THE ABS SYSTEM.*AK

DT: ON APRIL 23,05 SOUTHBOUND 1-95 IN FLORIDA CALLER WAS TRAVELING 55 MPH IN CENTER LANE AND THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE BLEW OUT, CAUSING PROPERTY DAMAGE TO THE CAR. BRAND NEW TIRES. *AK *JB

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE ABS SENSORS. THE ABS WAS ACTIVATING AT LOW SPEEDS. SHE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO DEALER FOR REPAIRS. THEY REPLACED THE ABS SENSORS. ALSO, THE ROTORS AND HUBS WERE REPLACED, ALLOWING THEM TO ACCESS THE SENSORS. THE PROBLEM OCCURRED AGAIN IN OCTOBER 2005. SHE WAS HAVING THE PROBLEM DIAGNOSED TODAY. *AK

WHEN DRIVING SLOWLY, LIKE AROUND A PARKING LOT, THE BRAKES MAKE NOISE AND WHEN THE PEDAL IS ENGAGED IT FEELS SPONGY AND THE BRAKES GRAB. *TS ***NAR RECEIVED 10-20-05*** THE CONSUME HEARD THAT GM HAS RECALL BRAKES IN OTHER STATES BUT NOT IN WISCONSIN. *NM

CONTINUAL ACTIVATION OF ABS WHEN COMING TO A STOP; ALSO ACTIVATES WHILE DRIVE MY 1999 CHEVY TAHOE; THIS HAS BEEN HAPPENING FOR MONTHS. *NM

WHEN DRIVING VEHICLE, THE STEERING JERKS TO THE RIGHT AND THEN IS OK FOR AWHILE AND THEN JERKS AGAIN TO THE RIGHT. IT IS LIKE SOMEONE JERKS ON THE STEERING WHEEL. *JB

DT: THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE. WHEN PRESSING THE BRAKES AT LOW SPEEDS THE VEHICLE WILL NOT STOP, IT WILL GO ON FOR A COUPLE OF FEET UNTIL IT STOPS. THE DEALER GAVE THE CONTACT AN ESTIMATE OF $4000 TO REPLACE BRAKES. THIS BEGAN TO OCCUR AT 37,000 MILES AFTER THE WARRANTY EXPIRED. THE CONTACT HAS BEEN HAVING THIS PROBLEM FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS, AND HAS 56,000 MILES ON THE VEHICLE NOW. HE FEELS THAT THIS IS A MANUFACTURER DEFECT, AND HE DOES NOT WANT TO REPLACE IT AT HIS EXPENSE. HE IS FILING THIS COMPLAINT IN REFERENCE TO THE NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN 05V379000. *AK (11/09/05) THERE WERE TIMES WHERE THE VEHICLE WOULD ALMOST REAR-END ANOTHER VEHICLE IN FRONT OF HIS. *SC

1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE [XXX] HAS BEEN EXPERIENCING INCREASINGLY SEVERE BRAKE SHUDDER AND ACTIVATION OF ABS SYSTEM AT LOW SPEEDS FOR THE PAST 6 WEEKS. HAPPENS NEARLY EVERY TIME I COME TO A SLOW STOP AND HAS CAUSED DOZENS OF NEAR MISS CRASHES IN CITY TRAFFIC. BROUGHT VEHICLE INTO DEALERSHIP ON OCTOBER 14, 2005 AND WAS INFORMED THAT ITEM WAS A CORROSION PROBLEM AND PART OF A RECALL. GMC WAS CONTACTED DIRECTLY AND INFORMED ME (AND THE DEALERSHIP) THAT MY VEHICLE VIN WAS NOT PART OF THE AUGUST 2005 RECALL NOTICE AND THAT PROBLEM WAS MY OWN PROBLEM. INSPECTION OF BRAKES BY LOCAL DEALERSHIP CONFIRMED THAT DEFECT WAS CONSISTENT WITH OTHER RECALL ITEMS AND INVOLVED A COMPONENT THAT WAS ACTUALLY OPERATING DEFECTIVELY (AS OPPOSED TO PREVENTATIVE REPLACEMENT OF THE PART). RECALL SHOULD BE RE-EXAMINED AND EXPANDED. *NM UPDATED 07/18/2012 *JS INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NEWSPAPER SAYS "GM RECALLS 800,000 PICKUPS, SUV'S" BUT WHEN I CALL GM ABOUT MY 1999 CHEVY TAHOE BRAKES LETTING OFF AT 4 MPH ( THE ABS SENSORS KICK IN) I AM TOLD MY VEHICLE IS NOT IN THE RECALL. *NM

MY 1999 CHEVY TAHOE LS 4 DOOR, 4 WD WAGON IS HAVING INCREASED STOPPING DISTANCE DUE TO THE ABS ENGAGING WHEN THEY SHOULDN'T. THIS HAS CAUSED 1 ACCIDENT (MINOR) AND 2 NEAR MISSES. THERE IS A RECALL FOR THIS PROBLEM FOR THIS MODEL BUT THE DEALER SAID THERE WAS NO RECALL. GM CUSTOMER SERVICE ACKNOWLEDGED THE RECALL BUT SAID IT SOMEHOW DID NOT COVER MY VEHICLE. *NM

DT: CONTACT OWNS A 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE. WHILE APPLYING THE BRAKES AS HE WAS ENTERING THE GARAGE THE BRAKES WOULD NOT WORK. THE PEDAL WENT ALMOST TO THE FLOOR BUT WOULD NOT STOP THE VEHICLE SO HE PUT THE VEHICLE INTO PARK. HE DID NOT HAVE TIME TO APPLY THE EMERGENCY BRAKE. THERE WERE NO WARNINGS INDICATING THAT THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE BRAKES. THISWAS THE FIRST TIME THAT THERE HAVE BEEN PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKES. RECALL 05V379000 FOR THE 2000-2002 MODELS WAS ISSUED, BUT NOT ON THE 1999 MODEL. THE DEALERSHIP AND THE MANUFACTURER SAID THAT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THE 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE, AND THIS VEHICLE WAS IDENTICAL TO THE 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE.*AK

ANTI-LOCK BRAKES ON 1999 CHEVROLET TAHOE HAVE FAILED CAUSING BRAKING PROBLEMS WHEN COMING TO A STOP. GM DID NOT INCLUDE THE 1999 YEAR TAHOE IN THEIR RECALL LEAVING THE COST OF REPAIR UP TO ME. *JB

ANTI-LOCK BRAKES ACTIVATE AT LIGHT PEDAL AND VERY LOW SPEEDS. EXTENDS STOPPING DISTANCE. *NM