TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 CEDAR CREEK SILVERBACK. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE NOTICED THAT THE FRONT END WAS NOT ALIGNED PROPERLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR DIAGNOSIS. THE MECHANIC STATED THE FRAME WOULD HAVE TO BE REWELDED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE. *TR
2009 Cedar Creek CRF36RLTS
Owners filed 3 complaints about this vehicle with federal regulators, most often about the tires. No safety recall has been issued.
| Component | Reports | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tires | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Structure › Body | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What owners reported
Newest filingsWHILE TRAVELING WITH MY 5TH WHEEL -2009 39' CEDAR CREEK I HAD ALL FOUR OF THE ORIGINAL TIRES FAIL CATASTROPHICALLY IN A PERIOD OF TWO DAYS AND APPROX 600 MILES. THE TIRES WERE 3 YEARS OLD WITH APPROXIMATELY 7000 MILES ON THEM. THESE WERE G LOAD TIRES ON A DUAL AXLE TRAILER WEIGHING AROUND 13,500 LBS. 12,500 TARE WEIGHT. YOUR FORM DOES NOT CONTAIN "LOAD BOSS" CHINESE MANUFACTURE TIRES. THE TIRES WERE PROPERLY INFLATED, AND THE TEMPERATURE DID NOT EXCEED 95 DEGREES. THE TIRES WERE SL285R/16 THE INFORMATION ENTERED FOR TIRES IS INCORRECT AS IT IS THE ONLY THING AVAILABLE TO CONTINUE. ALSO THE MODEL NO IF THE CEDAR CREEK RV IS INCORRECT AS IT IS THE ONLY ONE AVAILABLE ON YOU FORM. IT SHOULD BE THE 39'5SRD. *TR
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 FOREST RIVER CARDINAL RV EQUIPPED WITH IRONMAN HLT ELECTRO TIRES, SIZE LT235/85/R16, DOT NUMBER:OUHNHER. WHILE TRAVELING AT SPEEDS OF 40 MPH, THE REAR PASSENGERS TIRE EXPLODED WITHOUT WARNING. THE DEALER ADVISED THE FAILURE WAS CAUSED BY DEFECTIVE RUBBER IN THE TIRE. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 8,000. UPDATED 07/30/10. *LJ THE CONSUMER STATED THE TIRES SHOWED TREAD AND CASING PROBLEMS. UPDATED 09/30/10
3 of 3 complaints, reproduced as filed.
Other Cedar Creek models
All Cedar Creek models →Reading this record
No unusual pattern of severe incidents in the complaint record.
Complaint counts track how many cars were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as they track quality. A common model from 2013 has had a decade to accumulate reports; a rare one from last year has not. The signal worth weighing is in the severity columns, in whether the same component keeps appearing, and in whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.
Most recent recall on file: none. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.