Page 6 of 6 · complaints 251–269 of 269

2006 Cadillac CTS complaints

Owner reports filed with NHTSA about this vehicle, newest first and reproduced as filed. They are unverified accounts: one proves nothing, and a pattern across many is the thing worth reading. Back to the full 2006 record →

Steering › Column
Filed Nov 5, 2007VA

RUBBING NOISE IN STEERING COLUMN. SOUNDS LIKE PLASTIC BEING STRESSED WHEN TURNING STEERING WHEEL. VEHICLE HAS BEEN SERVICED ON 3 OCCASIONS (GROMMETS LUBRICATED) AT 2 DIFFERENT CADILLAC DEALERSHIPS AND NOISE HAS NOT BEEN ELIMINATED. WILL BE RETURNING CTS BACK TO DEALER AGAIN IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS. ALSO NOTED POPPING NOISE IN DASH PANEL. NOISE NOTED AS A FLAW IN DESIGN OF VEHICLE BE ONE DEALER UNREPAIRABLE. NOISE DETRACTS FROM PLEASURE OF OWNING A CADILLAC. *TR

Parking Brake
Filed Sep 4, 20079,030 milesPA

2006 CADILLAC CTS REAR DIFFERENTIAL FROZE UP- LOCKING REAR BRAKES WHILE DRIVING. *TR *UPDATED 12/12/07 *BF THE CONSUMER STATED HEARD SOME SQUEALING NOISE IN WHICH HE STATED MIGHT BE THE EMERGENCY BRAKE. THE CONSUMER STATED TOWED TO DEALER AND REAR DIFFERENTIAL ASSEMBLY REPLACED. THE CONSUMER STATED GM TRIED TO RECTIFY THE SITUATION BY OFFERING 12 MONTHS FREE OIL CHANGE AND TIRE ROTATION AND INSPECTION, HOWEVER THE CONSUMER DECLINED. UPDATED 12/12/07 *TR

Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Filed Aug 2, 200729,462 milesCA

MY 2006 CADILLAC MY BRAKE ALERT SYSTEM CAME ON. ON 07/09, I TOOK THE CADILLAC CTS (29,462 MILES) TO TRACY CADILLAC EXPLAINED TO TODD IN MAINTENANCE/SERV MY ALERT CAME ON & TO PLEASE LOOK INTO IT. ON JULY 10TH TODD CALLED ME AND STATED THAT IT NEEDS NEW BRAKES & POSSIBLE NEW ROTORS. AT SUCH LOW MILES ON A 18 MONTH OLD CAR I COULD NOT BELIEVE HE WAS TELLING ME THIS, HE SAID THIS THIS IS "NORMAL". AS A CONSUMER I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT NEW BRAKES/ROTORS ARE REQUIRED SO SOON & DON'T CONSIDER THIS "NORMAL WEAR & TEAR". WE PAID FOR A STURDY VEHICLE WITH A GOOD REPUTATION I E-MAILED CADILLAC CORP AND HERE IS A PARTIAL RESPONSE -LET ME KNOW IF YOU WANT THE FULL E-MAIL) (THEIR RESPONSE DATED JULY 24 FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP SPECIALIST: MEGHAN MACLENNAN) THE FRONT BRAKE PAD LINING USED IN TODAY'S CADILLAC IS FAR DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WAS USED IN THE PAST. BRAKE PADS MANUFACTURED TODAY CONTAIN NO ASBESTOS. MOST VEHICLES MANUFACTURED IN PAST YEARS USED A LINING CONTAINING ASBESTOS. THERE ARE MANY FACTORS BEHIND THE CHANGE IN THE DESIGN OF TODAY'S BRAKING SYSTEMS; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GUIDELINES, SERVICE LIFE, NOISE LEVEL, STOPPING ABILITY, FADE RESISTANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. THEREFORE, AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS HAVE MOVED INTO A NEW ERA IN BRAKE PAD COMPOSITION, BALANCING LONG LASTING METALLIC MATERIALS WITH SOFTER MATERIALS, WHICH OFFSET BRAKE "SQUEAL" INHERENT IN A MORE METALLIC PAD. THIS NEW MATERIAL IS MUCH SAFER TO THE ENVIRONMENT BECAUSE OF THE ELIMINATION OF ASBESTOS, BUT A TRADE

Power Train › Driveline › Differential UnitCrash
Filed Jul 25, 200710,530 milesWI

THE FIRST PROBLEM I ENCOUNTERED WITH THE VEHICLE WAS A BROKEN CLUTCH PEDAL RETURN SPRING THAT HAD FALLEN OUT FROM UNDER THE DASHBOARD AT 8,850 MILES. THIS WAS REPAIRED UNDER WARRANTY. SECOND, I HAD A CADILLAC DEALERSHIP REPLACE THE REAR DIFFERENTIAL UNDER WARRANTY DUE TO A WHINING NOISE AND LEAK PRESENT AT 9,021 MILES. AT THIS TIME I HAD QUESTIONED A CLANK NOISE PRESENT IN THE DRIVELINE WHEN ENGAGING OR DISENGAGING THE CLUTCH. I WAS TOLD THIS IS NORMAL, AND NO PROBLEM WAS PRESENT AT THIS TIME. AT 10,530 MILES, I WAS MAKING A RIGHT TURN FROM A STOP IN FIRST GEAR. I HAD ACCELERATED TO 20MPH AND SHIFTED INTO SECOND GEAR. I BEGAN ACCELERATING IN SECOND GEAR WHEN THE DRIVELINE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE VEHICLE HAD SPUN 270 DEGREES TO THE RIGHT LOOSING CONTROL. THIS CAUSED THE THE VEHICLE TO HIT THE RIGHT SIDE CURB WITH EXTREME FORCE TO THE LEFT REAR WHEEL, DAMAGING THE REAR SUSPENSION AND DIFFERENTIAL. THE VEHICLE PROCEEDED OVER THE CURB WITH ALL FOUR WHEELS AND STOPPED ON A SIDEWALK. THIS ALSO CAUSED CHASSIS AND FRONT SUSPENSION DAMAGE. THE VEHICLE WAS UNABLE TO MOVE AFTER THE ACCIDENT DUE TO THE CLUTCH NOT ENGAGING. THE CLUTCH PEDAL TRAVEL IS NOW ABOUT 3 INCHES TOTAL OFF THE FLOOR, OPPOSED TO THE ORIGINAL 6 INCH TRAVEL EQUAL TO THE HEIGHT OF THE BRAKE PEDAL. AS A RESULT OF THE ACCIDENT THE VEHICLE WAS TOTALED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SOLD. AT THIS TIME NO ASSISTANCE HAS BEEN GIVEN BY GENERAL MOTORS. *TR

Electrical System › WiringFire
Filed Jun 25, 200712,000 milesTX

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 CADILLAC CTS. WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THE CONTACT HEARD A GRINDING NOISE COMING FROM THE VEHICLE. HE PULLED OVER AND THE VEHICLE CAUGHT FIRE. THE VEHICLE WAS DAMAGED. THE CAUSE OF THE FIRE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE VIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 12,000.

Power Train › Driveline › Differential Unit
Filed Apr 17, 200778 milesCA

REAR DIFFERENTIAL WHINE AND LEAKAGE - 2006 MODEL, BUILD DATE NOV 2005. THE CAR IS USED FOR FREEWAY COMMUTING ONLY (300 MILES/DAY) AND HAS NEVER BEEN DRIVEN HARD. THE DIFFERENTIAL HAS WHINED SINCE DELIVERY WITH 78 MILES ON THE CAR. THE DIFFERENTIAL FLUID WAS CHANGED AT 2847 MILES WITH REDLINE 75W-90 SYNTHETIC FLUID AND GM 1052358 ADDITIVE, AND SIGNIFICANT METAL POWDER WAS REMOVED FROM THE MAGNETIC DRAIN PLUG AT THE TIME OF CHANGE. ON APRIL 16, AT A LITTLE OVER TWO MONTHS AND 8413 MILES, I TOOK THE CAR BACK TO THE SELLING DEALERSHIP FOR REPAIR, AS THE DIFFERENTIAL HAD BEGUN LEAKING ABOUT APRIL 10 AND ~7200 MILES. THE SERVICE MANAGER, WYMAN ADCOCK, DROVE THE CAR AND REPORTED THAT WHILE HE COULD 'HEAR A SLIGHT WHINE', HE THOUGHT THAT IT WAS NORMAL AND I SHOULD CONTINUE TO DRIVE IT TO SEE IF IT GETS WORSE. I POINTED OUT TO HIM THAT GM HAS HAD PROBLEMS WITH THE DIFFERENTIAL ON THIS CAR SINCE IT'S INTRODUCTION AND THAT ANOTHER CADILLAC DEALER TOLD ME THAT THEY HAD REPLACED SO MANY DIFFERENTIALS IN THESE CARS THAT THEY NOW KEEP ONE IN STOCK. THE SERVICE MANAGER TOLD ME THAT HE HAD NEVER HEARD OF A PROBLEM WITH THESE CARS. I SUGGESTED THAT I SHOULD TAKE IT ANOTHER DEALERSHIP, AND LEFT. *JB

Air BagsCrash1 injured
Filed Dec 17, 200615,500 milesTX

MY NEW CADILLAC CTS (PURCHASED IN 3/06) WAS T-BONED. NO AIR BAGS DEPLOYED...I HAVE BEEN EXPERIENCING MAJOR BACK AND LEG PAINS OF WHICH THE DOCTOR SAID COULD BE RELATED TO FAILURE OF AIR BAG TO DEPLOY. MY CAR WAS FIXED BY A LOCAL CADILLAC DEALERSHIP AND THEY HAVE FAILED REPEATEDLY TO ANSWER OUR CONCERNS. WE CONTACTED CADILLAC AND HAVE HAD NO ONES ATTENTION. *JB

Vehicle Speed ControlCrash
Filed Dec 11, 2006CA

2006 CTS ENGINE RACED AT HIGH SPEEDS WHEN BACKING UP WITHOUT ANY PRESSURE TO THE GAS PEDAL. *TS THE FIRST TIME THE INCIDENT HAPPENED, THERE WAS DAMAGE DONE TO THE DRIVERS SIDE TIRE, HOWEVER THE SECOND INCIDENT RESULTED IN THE VEHICLE RACING DOWN THE DRIVEWAY, ACROSS THE STREET AND INTO A NEIGHBORS HOUSE, WHICH CAUSED CONSIDERABLE DAMAGE TO THE HOUSE AND THE CAR. THE VEHICLE WAS TOTALED. *JB

Power Train › Axle Assembly
Filed Dec 8, 20065,900 milesNJ

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH UNDER NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS, THE REAR TIRES LOCKED. THERE WERE NO WARNINGS PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE SERVICE DEALER, WHO DETERMINED THAT THE REAR AXLE FRACTURED.*AK THE REAR PINION SEALS LEAKED WHICH CAUSED THE AXLE TO SEIZE. UPDATED 01/19/07. *JB

Service Brakes, Hydraulic
Filed Nov 28, 20069,000 milesAZ

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE APPLYING SLIGHT BRAKE PRESSURE AT 55 MPH IN STOP AND GO TRAFFIC ON THE HIGHWAY, ALL FOUR WHEELS LOCKED, AND THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOORBOARD WITHOUT WARNING. THE CONTACT ATTEMPTED TO DISENGAGE THE BRAKES BY PUMPING THE PEDAL UP AND DOWN. AFTERWARDS, THE VEHICLE OPERATED AT A REDUCED SPEED, AND HESITATED TO ACCELERATE AS THOUGH BRAKE PRESSURE WAS BEING APPLIED. THE DEALER WAS ALERTED.

Power Train › Driveline › Differential Unit
Filed Nov 27, 20065,438 milesVA

NEW (4 MONTH OLD) CTS WOULD NOT ACCELERATE WHEN I ATTEMPTED TO PASS ANOTHER CAR, CTS SEEMED TO SLOW DOWN. THE CAR BACKFIRED AND BLEW WHITE SMOKE. THE REAR OF THE CAR MADE A LOUD NOISE AS IF GRINDING AND LOUD RUMBLES. COMPUTER DID NOT DID NOT DETECT MALFUNCTION. DEALER DETERMINED REAR END DIFFERENTIAL UNIT MALFUNCTION. *JB

Power Train › Driveline › Differential Unit
Filed Oct 16, 200620,000 milesWI

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH ON THE INTERSTATE, BOTH REAR WHEELS LOCKED WITHOUT WARNING RESULTING IN A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL. THE CONTACT MANAGED TO MANEUVER THE VEHICLE TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD WITHOUT INCIDENT, BUT ALL THE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER PANEL LIGHTS ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A DEALER WHO DETERMINED THE REAR DIFFERENTIAL NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. AFTER THE DIFFERENTIAL UNIT REPLACEMENT, THE PROBLEM PERSISTED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT ALERTED.

Exterior Lighting
Filed Oct 6, 20064,800 milesNY

AUTOMATIC LIGHT SENSOR DOES NOT SENSE DAYLIGHT FOR 5 MINS AND 23 SECS AT THE LAST TIMING. IN A DAYLIGHT DRIVE OF 12 MILES, THE CAR TURNED NIGHT-TIME LAMPS ON AND OFF 6 TIMES. DEALER SAYS IT IS WORKING AS DESIGNED. THIS HAS JUST STARTED TO HAPPEN THE LAST 12 DAYS. NO LIGHT SETTINGS HAVE BEEN CHANGED SINCE THEY WERE SET WHEN I PURCHASED THE CAR. I WAS TOLD BY SHOLZ CADILLAC REPAIR TO WAIT FOR THE LIGHTS TO SENSE THE CHANGE BEFORE DRIVING. HOWEVER, WHAT DO I DO WHEN ENTERING AND EXITING A TUNNEL? WHEN PLACED SIDE BY SIDE WITH A GMC XUV WITH AN AUTOMATIC SENSOR, THE GMC SENSES THE DIFFERENCE IN LIGHT IN 3 SECONDS. THIS DELAY IN MY CADILLAC IS CERTAINLY A SAFETY HAZARD. *NM

Power Train › Driveline › Differential Unit
Filed Sep 10, 20065,000 milesNC

(1) NORMAL DRIVING (2) REAR DIFFERENTIAL LEAK AND WHINE; COOLANT LEAK FROM THE RADIATOR (3) GOING TO THE DEALER TOMORROW. *NM

Electrical System
Filed Jul 24, 20063,100 milesCA

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE STALLED SUDDENLY AT VARIOUS SPEEDS. THE DEALERSHIP REPLACED EITHER ONE OR TWO UNKNOWN PARTS TO THE COMPUTER OF THE VEHICLE OR THE ENTIRE COMPUTER. THE CONTACT WAS UNSURE OF THE DETAILS OF THE REPAIR. WITHIN 50 MILES FROM THE DEALER, THE VEHICLE STALLED AGAIN. THE REDUCED ENGINE POWER LIGHT ILLUMINATED ON THE DASH PRIOR TO EACH INCIDENT. AFTER SITTING FOR A WHILE, THE VEHICLE RESTARTED. HOWEVER, THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALERSHIP AFTER BOTH INCIDENTS BECAUSE THE CONTACT WAS UNSURE OF THE SAFETY OF THE VEHICLE. *AK UPDATED 8/7/2006 - *NM

Power Train
Filed May 6, 20061,487 milesCA

1. WAS DRIVING MY BLACK 2006 CTS V WITH 1,486 MILES ON IT HOME FROM GETTING FOOD WHEN IT STOPPED WORKING. I TURNED THE CAR OFF AND TRIED TO MAKE IT GO. IT WOULDN'T GO. HAD THE CAR TOWED TO CRESTVIEW CADILLAC. 2. THE DEALER SAID THAT MY REAR DIFFERENTIAL FAILED. THEY CLAIM THAT I MUST HAVE BEEN DRAG RACING THE CAR WHICH I HAVE NEVER DONE EVEN ONCE. THEY CLAIM TO HAVE FOUND TRACTION COMPOUND AND THEY ARE TELLING ME THAT MY TIRES ARE NEAR BALD. 3. DEALER WOULD NOT WARRANTY THE CAR. THEY HAD TO REPLACE THE REAR DIFFERENTIAL AND THE RIGHT AXLE. *NM

Exterior Lighting › Tail Lights
Filed Apr 3, 2006CA

IN CASE YOU ARE NOT ALREADY AWARE OF THIS, THE TAIL LIGHTS OF SOME NEWER MODEL PASSENGER AUTOMOBILES ARE VISUALLY DISTRACTING BECAUSE THE LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) ARRAY THAT IS USED FOR THE TAIL LIGHTS IS BEING STROBED ON AND OFF, INSTEAD OF BEING ON CONTINUOUSLY. I HAVE NOTICED THIS ON THE LATEST MODEL CADILLAC AND JAGUAR VEHICLES, TO NAME TWO. THE RATE OF STROBING IS HIGH ENOUGH SO THAT YOU DON'T SEE THE FLASHING WHEN LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE TAILLIGHT. HOWEVER, AS MY EYES MOVE TO SCAN MULTIPLE LANES OF HIGHWAY TRAFFIC AHEAD, I CAN SEE THE STROBING IN MY PERIPHERAL VISION AND MY FIRST REACTION TO THE SUDDEN FLASH IS THAT THE BRAKE LIGHTS HAVE COME ON. IT CATCHES MY ATTENTION AND TRICKS MY EYES TO LOOK BACK AT THAT PARTICULAR VEHICLE TO CONFIRM WHETHER OR NOT IT IS INDEED BRAKING. THIS IS DISTRACTING. THE NEWER LED VEHICLE TAIL LIGHTS SHOULD BE ILLUMINATED CONTINUOUSLY (JUST LIKE A GOOD OLD FASHION LIGHT BULB), NOT STROBED ON AND OFF AT A HIGH RATE. *JB

Power Train › Driveline › Differential Unit
Filed Mar 27, 20062,000 milesTX

NEW CTS CADILLAC 2200 MILES. LEAKING OIL FROM THE REAR DIFFERENTIAL ON TO THE EXHAUST PIPE. NOISE (CLANKING) WHEN PUTTING THE CAR INTO GEAR. *JB

Power Train › Driveline › Differential Unit
Filed Feb 25, 2006NV

2006 CADILLAC CTS-V: 1. REAR END LEAKAGE @ 200 MILES 2. REAR END CLUNK WHEN SHIFTING @ 1000 MILES *JB

Reading these

NHTSA publishes every complaint as the owner wrote it and investigates only a fraction. Spelling, capitalisation and judgement are the filer’s own. What carries weight is repetition: the same component failing the same way across many filings, and whether the manufacturer eventually opened a recall for it.

Full record for the 2006 Cadillac CTS → · Every CTS year → · How the figures are calculated →